|
JohnH wrote: On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not. Who made the error? John H John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an error. Where? John H Right here, John. You stated that you WEREN'T a liar, then said this: There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar h=ADere. His name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just br=ADazenly lies. John H=20 So, which is it, you are either a liar, or made an error. |
On 31 Jan 2005 09:49:03 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: JohnH wrote: On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not. Who made the error? John H John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an error. Where? John H Right here, John. You stated that you WEREN'T a liar, then said this: There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar h*ere. His name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just br*azenly lies. John H So, which is it, you are either a liar, or made an error. Nothing erroneous there, except punctuation. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
JohnH wrote: On 31 Jan 2005 09:49:03 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not. Who made the error? John H John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an error. Where? John H Right here, John. You stated that you WEREN'T a liar, then said this: There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar h=ADere. His name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just br=ADazenly lies. John H So, which is it, you are either a liar, or made an error. Nothing erroneous there, except punctuation. Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have stated. |
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have stated. Did he not say that? John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have stated. Did he not say that? Looks like asslicker is trying to 'cow down' you LMAO John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
P.Fritz wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have stated. Did he not say that? Looks like asslicker is trying to 'cow down' you LMAO Paul, again, I'm sorry that you've never been to northern PA to hear that particular expression. And, I see that you are still not adult enough to post anything without childish name calling. Maybe, seeing how you need a support group for every other aspect of your pathetic life, you can get support for that. Try it. You may actually get someone beside Tuuuk to befriend you. |
JohnH wrote: On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have stated. Did he not say that? John H Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After all, you are the one who stated that he said so. |
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: JohnH wrote: On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have stated. Did he not say that? John H Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After all, you are the one who stated that he said so. How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his Vietnam activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you read it and forgot. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
JohnH wrote: On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have stated. Did he not say that? John H Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After all, you are the one who stated that he said so. How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his Vietnam activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you read it and forgot. John H The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made the allegation. Prove it. You can't, John. That's NOT what he said. |
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:
JohnH wrote: On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have stated. Did he not say that? John H Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After all, you are the one who stated that he said so. How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his Vietnam activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you read it and forgot. John H The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made the allegation. Prove it. You can't, John. That's NOT what he said. Well, what do you think he said? John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com