![]() |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:43:27 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:33:05 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: PS. Now I'm waiting for Harry to tell us how and why he turned down the Air Force and Naval Academies! John H That should be easy, even for a d.f. like you, Herring. I didn't want to waste my life as a soldier-boy. Such high praise from the mouth of a liar, Harry. You wouldn't have made a pimple on a soldier's ass, liar. John H I'll bet you've played with lots of pimples on lots of soldiers' asses, eh, John? Bet on your lying abilities, Krause. You'll win then. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:13:12 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Tuuuk wrote: yet you have lost 2 wives,,, lost them now that is more a fitting word for your situation,,, the matrimonial nest,,, lol,,, krause,, were you tossed out of the nest or did you toss the ex-wives out of the nest,,, ? Your two ex-wives we are talking about One more time, crap-for-brains. I have been married twice. I am still married and living with my second wife. I have one ex-wife. Not two. You have fixated yourself, as it were, on incorrect information you have internalized. No wonder you will never amount to dog**** in this world. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. Dog **** is a big step up from your level. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:18:29 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:43:27 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:33:05 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: PS. Now I'm waiting for Harry to tell us how and why he turned down the Air Force and Naval Academies! John H That should be easy, even for a d.f. like you, Herring. I didn't want to waste my life as a soldier-boy. Such high praise from the mouth of a liar, Harry. You wouldn't have made a pimple on a soldier's ass, liar. John H I'll bet you've played with lots of pimples on lots of soldiers' asses, eh, John? Bet on your lying abilities, Krause. You'll win then. John H I'll bet you loved barracks life, eh, Johhny...all those showers with the boys...all those butt pimples to squeeze. What joy. No wonder you decided to stay in the Army. Keep digging, Harry. You may yet reach a level lower than dog ****. What a pathetic liar, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:33:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: JohnH wrote: Bet on your lying abilities, Krause. You'll win then. John H I'll bet you loved barracks life, eh, Johhny...all those showers with the boys...all those butt pimples to squeeze. What joy. No wonder you decided to stay in the Army. Keep digging, Harry. You may yet reach a level lower than dog ****. What a pathetic liar, Krause. Why, Johhnyboy, I'm just playing with you at the level you set. Tell me, when you attend those military reunions, do you hop in the shower with the boys? Try more name-calling and innuendos, Krause. You're just a ****ing liar. For you, nothing more is necessary. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:47:26 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:33:51 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Bet on your lying abilities, Krause. You'll win then. John H I'll bet you loved barracks life, eh, Johhny...all those showers with the boys...all those butt pimples to squeeze. What joy. No wonder you decided to stay in the Army. Keep digging, Harry. You may yet reach a level lower than dog ****. What a pathetic liar, Krause. Why, Johhnyboy, I'm just playing with you at the level you set. Tell me, when you attend those military reunions, do you hop in the shower with the boys? Try more name-calling and innuendos, Krause. You're just a ****ing liar. For you, nothing more is necessary. John H Why, Johnnyboy, I'm just tossing the balls you're trying to serve back at you...are you so dumb you haven't figured that out? No intelligence needed to know you're a liar, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not. Who made the error? John H John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an error. |
P. Fritz wrote: Of course asslicker will jump in ad make some wild and unfounded accusations.......not wanting to be "cow downed" LMAO Paul, I see that you are particularly childish acting today. Have a bad weekend? No one from usenet around to help you raise your kid, or deal with your wife leaving you? |
On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not. Who made the error? John H John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an error. Where? John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not. Who made the error? John H John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an error. Where? Asslicker is just demonstrating his parrot harry routine.......it is a symptom of his FAS. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
P.Fritz wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not. Who made the error? John H John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an error. Where? Asslicker is just demonstrating his parrot harry routine.......it is a symptom of his FAS. Please show what evidence you have that I have FAS. Be specific. On the contrary, Paul, if you knew anything about FAS, you'd know that one of the symptoms of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, is childish behavior. Is that why you continue to call childish names? Or is it just because you need to bolster your pathetic ego since you don't have the fortitude to raise a child, or keep a wife? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com