JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
snip...
Tuuk, by the way, isn't the only fool who almost always gets everything
wrong. But he's probably the best example.


Tuuk couldn't care less about the truth. His only concern is how to best
jab and poke at you...probing for any perceived weakness.

On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably around
somewhere.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Well, he tries, but he's not equipped to do battle with me, verbally or
otherwise. He's a real mommy's boy, in ways I hadn't imagined. Have you
noticed that he's so typical of the right-wing buttwipe cowards around
here...eager to attack on anything, but very, very reluctant to let you
know anything about him.

I've got my watch cat on the alert for anyone pulling a pedicab down our
street.

Or delivering sushi...or whatever. He admitted that's one of his jobs.
You're right...he hasn't mentioned what town he lives in...and I can't blame
him. If the local hard line separatists in Quebec read what he says about
the French here........he'd be sushi himself.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

BTW, have you ever had Thai food? I tried it a few times at supposedly
good Thai restaurants. Smelled awful and tasted worse, and I really like
Asian food. Blech.

No, I've been reluctant to try Asian food since I heard dogs were a
delicacy. This doesn't apply to the 'Western' version of Chinese food.

Subject: Good god, you posting about dinners!
From: Harry Krause

BTW, have you ever had Thai food? I tried it a few times at supposedly
good Thai restaurants. Smelled awful and tasted worse, and I really like
Asian food. Blech.


Not sure how you can like Asian food and not like Thai food?
But to each his own.

Capt. Bill

krause,,,

have you ever tried german food?? OOps,,, o ya,, I forgot,, you said you a
german but then later reversed that statement and said that krause wasn't
german.

Kinda like when you put your own mother on the east coast only to move her
to the west coast.
Kinda like when you claimed you had a loaded hand gun in your home only to
claim a day later that you do not.
Kinda like the time you reported that you are on your third wife, this time
20 years your junior,,lol,, only to report that you lied.
Kinda like the time you reported the sheriff up the road watches your lane
for you, and land only to report that now you are watching it.
Kinda like the time you reported you were not leaving your home all day
because of the miserable conditions outside only to report an hour later
that you had been to the upscale alcohol store.
Kinda like the time ,,,, gees,,, krause it is every time,,,


You are a liar,,,very bad one but still a liar,,,










"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

BTW, have you ever had Thai food? I tried it a few times at supposedly
good Thai restaurants. Smelled awful and tasted worse, and I really like
Asian food. Blech.


No, I've been reluctant to try Asian food since I heard dogs were a
delicacy. This doesn't apply to the 'Western' version of Chinese food.



Woof!

JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were erroneous.
Which is it?

On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,
then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",
as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?
After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?
Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one
who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably
around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that
he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were
erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he "identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that subject.