"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Chuck you are the most abusive person here!!! Anyone who doesn't kowtow
to you &/or your non boating lying mate Krause is attacked.

Bull****.

Look back in the thread. Did I "attack" Jimmie Me Too, or did he just come
charging in making comments about underwear, etc, without any provocation?

Check that out, and express an opinion.

I don't chase people around the NG trying to pick a fight, but I am
getting a
bit less
tolerant of a small group of mental midgets
with no other apparent purpose here. When they come looking for me, they
may
not much like what ther're going to find in the future.

You can often be too plain spoken and abusive for your own good. Even
though
you are often wrong, (or at least controversial) in some of your opinions
and
you often become insulting without provocation, you are at least a boater.
That
puts you ahead of some here who are not.

Honestly Chuck I know you come from the "sell, sell, sell" side of life
but you should know about basic safety stuff. Even for your own good:-)

In the US, we more routinely use the term "screen" rather than "gauze" for
the
same material. You can talk about a flame arresting "screen" on a carb, an
alternator, or what not and everybody will know what you mean. "Gauze" is
really cryptic. If that was a US survey, the surveyor should have
done the customer a favor and expressed his recommendations in
commonspeak.

And yeah, I come from the sell, sell, sell side of the business. You ought
to
be darn grateful for guys like me. If we didn't sell, sell, sell all this
stuff, stuff, stuff, there wouldn't be much for you to fix, fix, fix,
would
there? :-)



Time for some chill pills Chuckie. It is ok to be wrong. But it is not ok
not to see that you are.

Time for another break from the NG Chuck like you did last year. You are
about to explode once again.

'Tis only a NG. Relax and take a deep breath.

Time for some chill pills Chuckie. It is ok to be wrong. But it is not ok
not to see that you are.

Is that more or less OK than never participating unless jumping into a
discussion with a schidtload of negative personal comments? Is that OK to do,
but not OK to fail to see that is all one is doing?

Time for another break from the NG Chuck like you did last year. You are
about to explode once again.

Naw, I'm not going to explode. As always, I will refrain from picking a fight
with you- but if you or somebody like yourself wants to start a crap fight (as
you did in this thread, there can be no denial) don't act all hurt and wounded
if your puny little salvo is returned rather amplified. I think some people
would be willing to go up against a Sherman tank with a sharp stick.

You're a conservative, Jim. You like rules.
Here they are, twixt you and I, as far as I'm
concerned: you leave me alone and I won't waste moment's time reading your
posts attacking others. I have better things to do than try to goad you into a
flame war- even if I enjoyed a flame war, you are in, shall we say, a
"different" league than persons I would care to trade barbs with?

If you insist on shifting a discussion of an obscure technical term to a
discussion of personalities, (as you tried to do in this thread), and if you
attempt to make that shift with your sewer pipe quality insulting remarks,
don't be surprised if I respond.

(knowing full well I shouldn't respond. It's the response that's the payoff for
you trolls, isn't it?)

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Time for some chill pills Chuckie. It is ok to be wrong. But it is not
ok
not to see that you are.

Is that more or less OK than never participating unless jumping into a
discussion with a schidtload of negative personal comments? Is that OK to
do,
but not OK to fail to see that is all one is doing?

Time for another break from the NG Chuck like you did last year. You are
about to explode once again.

Naw, I'm not going to explode. As always, I will refrain from picking a
fight
with you- but if you or somebody like yourself wants to start a crap fight
(as
you did in this thread, there can be no denial) don't act all hurt and
wounded
if your puny little salvo is returned rather amplified. I think some
people
would be willing to go up against a Sherman tank with a sharp stick.

You're a conservative, Jim. You like rules.
Here they are, twixt you and I, as far as I'm
concerned: you leave me alone and I won't waste moment's time reading your
posts attacking others. I have better things to do than try to goad you
into a
flame war- even if I enjoyed a flame war, you are in, shall we say, a
"different" league than persons I would care to trade barbs with?

If you insist on shifting a discussion of an obscure technical term to a
discussion of personalities, (as you tried to do in this thread), and if
you
attempt to make that shift with your sewer pipe quality insulting remarks,
don't be surprised if I respond.

(knowing full well I shouldn't respond. It's the response that's the
payoff for
you trolls, isn't it?)


I can see the spit coming out of the corners of your mouth while you typed
that Chuckie.

On 04 Dec 2004 02:00:18 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Time for some chill pills Chuckie. It is ok to be wrong. But it is not ok
not to see that you are.

Is that more or less OK than never participating unless jumping into a
discussion with a schidtload of negative personal comments? Is that OK to do,
but not OK to fail to see that is all one is doing?

Time for another break from the NG Chuck like you did last year. You are
about to explode once again.

Naw, I'm not going to explode. As always, I will refrain from picking a fight
with you- but if you or somebody like yourself wants to start a crap fight (as
you did in this thread, there can be no denial) don't act all hurt and wounded
if your puny little salvo is returned rather amplified. I think some people
would be willing to go up against a Sherman tank with a sharp stick.

You're a conservative, Jim. You like rules.
Here they are, twixt you and I, as far as I'm
concerned: you leave me alone and I won't waste moment's time reading your
posts attacking others. I have better things to do than try to goad you into a
flame war- even if I enjoyed a flame war, you are in, shall we say, a
"different" league than persons I would care to trade barbs with?

If you insist on shifting a discussion of an obscure technical term to a
discussion of personalities, (as you tried to do in this thread), and if you
attempt to make that shift with your sewer pipe quality insulting remarks,
don't be surprised if I respond.

(knowing full well I shouldn't respond. It's the response that's the payoff for
you trolls, isn't it?)

Filter him, like I did Krause. Better for your serenity.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"JimH" wrote in message
...




Time for some chill pills Chuckie. It is ok to be wrong. But it is not
ok
not to see that you are.

Time for another break from the NG Chuck like you did last year. You are
about to explode once again.

'Tis only a NG. Relax and take a deep breath.



Chuck maybe a very leftist Liberal, which I do not really think he is. Just
a little further left that most here. But he was not wrong. He gave an
educated guess as to the term gauze used in the British Version of English.
Gauze here in the states, is normally a lot of layers of stuff, not a
screen. And Karen maliciously attacked him, and which just like most of the
USA does when attacked Chuck fired back.

Calif Bill wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...


Time for some chill pills Chuckie. It is ok to be wrong. But it is not

ok

not to see that you are.

Time for another break from the NG Chuck like you did last year. You are
about to explode once again.

'Tis only a NG. Relax and take a deep breath.




Chuck maybe a very leftist Liberal, which I do not really think he is. Just
a little further left that most here. But he was not wrong. He gave an
educated guess as to the term gauze used in the British Version of English.
Gauze here in the states, is normally a lot of layers of stuff, not a
screen. And Karen maliciously attacked him, and which just like most of the
USA does when attacked Chuck fired back.



I'd like to claim provocation & he did "pretend" to be seeking an
answer, however I confess I attacked him just for the fun of it, it's
dead easy & he's an OT NG spamming menace:-)

& fired blanks back at me as the lying loony left always does:-)

K

"K. Smith" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...


Time for some chill pills Chuckie. It is ok to be wrong. But it is not

ok

not to see that you are.

Time for another break from the NG Chuck like you did last year. You
are
about to explode once again.

'Tis only a NG. Relax and take a deep breath.




Chuck maybe a very leftist Liberal, which I do not really think he is.
Just
a little further left that most here. But he was not wrong. He gave an
educated guess as to the term gauze used in the British Version of
English.
Gauze here in the states, is normally a lot of layers of stuff, not a
screen. And Karen maliciously attacked him, and which just like most of
the
USA does when attacked Chuck fired back.



I'd like to claim provocation & he did "pretend" to be seeking an
answer, however I confess I attacked him just for the fun of it, it's
dead easy & he's an OT NG spamming menace:-)

& fired blanks back at me as the lying loony left always does:-)

K

You over estimate your firepower and underestimate Chucks.

Calif Bill wrote:
"K. Smith" wrote in message
...

Calif Bill wrote:

"JimH" wrote in message
...


Time for some chill pills Chuckie. It is ok to be wrong. But it is not

ok


not to see that you are.

Time for another break from the NG Chuck like you did last year. You

are

about to explode once again.

'Tis only a NG. Relax and take a deep breath.




Chuck maybe a very leftist Liberal, which I do not really think he is.

Just

a little further left that most here. But he was not wrong. He gave an
educated guess as to the term gauze used in the British Version of

English.

Gauze here in the states, is normally a lot of layers of stuff, not a
screen. And Karen maliciously attacked him, and which just like most of

the

USA does when attacked Chuck fired back.



I'd like to claim provocation & he did "pretend" to be seeking an
answer, however I confess I attacked him just for the fun of it, it's
dead easy & he's an OT NG spamming menace:-)

& fired blanks back at me as the lying loony left always does:-)

K


You over estimate your firepower and underestimate Chucks.



:-) Thanks Bill & that's your estimation of my estimation, which is
clearly an in-estimate, because it's not possible given the rules of
this universe to underestimate Chuckles, unless of course you estimated
him in knots per hour:-).

K