Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#131
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... More often than you may realize, cops have to deal with situations which involve no violation of the law. But, smart cops show up anyway because they know that if they don't, they'll have a REAL problem on their hands otherwise. You may want to ask a cop about this next thing, but I know you're not too keen on getting involved with your local public servants. Forget hostage situations. Forget armed robbers. Forget bomb scares. What is the most dangerous and unpredictable situation for which cops are called regularly? Hint: 99% of the time, it initially involves no laws being broken. "Disturbance" calls. -- -= swatcop =- "If it wasn't for stupid people I'd be unemployed." |
#132
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Backyard Renegade" wrote in message om... "swatcop" wrote in message news:9RMCb.12536 Thank you for your input. Seems the jetskis are a common topic, and will be dealt with more severely. I have been pretty impressed with what you have had to say, until now. Hating jet skies as much as any other sane boater it is still my opinion that if you go into this new assignment with that attitude, and acting on that prejudice as you state you will, than you are just another pain in the ass, bad cop. As for the waterway, I'll be on the west coast in the Gulf of Mexico. Thank you for the welcome and for the information, I plan on making a POSITIVE change out there and not just becoming another pain in the ass. The way to make a positive change is to make your compadres see things more from the user point of view and bring your practical experience as a boater and a human to the job, not by going out with a "piggish" attitude, looking for jetskiers and other (mostly law abiding) folks who don't fall in line with your personal boating or even lifestyle, preferences and treating them "more severely". Scott Ingersoll, who has seen to many good cops fall into this trap... I'm glad someone "pro-jetski" finally responded so I can get an even view of the situation. As I stated in other replies, I am a fair guy. I won't headhunt jetskis and hand out fistfulls of citations, but if all of the boaters are complaining about the "water etiquette" usually displayed by PWCs, then there's got to be a problem somewhere. I believe that I can get the message out in my area that inconsiderate operation of PWCs will not be acceptable without breaking out the ticket book. Once I warn someone, though, I WILL issue a citation for subsequent offenses. That goes for PWCs, boats, cars, skateboards, or whatever. Thanks for your input, yours will be noted along with the rest of them. -- -= swatcop =- "If it wasn't for stupid people I'd be unemployed." |
#133
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
swatcop wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... If you want to talk about extremes, consider a situation where there's NO enforcement. Then, citizens will take matters into their own hands. Not a good idea. Better yet, how about life in other less civilized countries? You steal, they cut off your hand. You hit someone with your car and kill them, they shoot you right there on the spot. And these crybabies are complaining about having to wear a seatbelt, and a seatbelt's only purpose or function in life is to save lives. Unreal. You know, the crime rate is a lot lower in those other countries. Maybe we should adopt some of their methods. We're getting closer and closer... -- Email sent to is never read. |
#134
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, you're not. The jet skiers' I see aren't rude. I
accidentally ran across a nice little lake her in NC where most all of the folks boating aren't complete morons. The topic started with watching for 'wreckless jet skiers' but somehow got perverted to watch out for 'all jet skiers'. -JimL WaIIy wrote: Am I the only boater here with no bad jet ski stories to tell? The ones I see are just having fun and not bothering anyone. |
#135
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Up on lake Conroe, the fishermen found that treble hooks cast just right
will keep the jetskiers away. Or hook 'em. "JimL" wrote in message ... Actually, you're not. The jet skiers' I see aren't rude. I accidentally ran across a nice little lake her in NC where most all of the folks boating aren't complete morons. The topic started with watching for 'wreckless jet skiers' but somehow got perverted to watch out for 'all jet skiers'. -JimL WaIIy wrote: Am I the only boater here with no bad jet ski stories to tell? The ones I see are just having fun and not bothering anyone. |
#136
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good for you. You're the exception, that's for sure!
"swatcop" wrote in message om... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Keith" wrote in message ... Most traffic laws and enforcement are only revenue generation techniques, having little to do with safety. For instance, why do you see so many cops out with radar guns on highways, when most accidents occur at intersections? Easier to bring in the $$ that way. I'd agree. Each year, before the high-traffic holidays, a NY State Police spokesperson issues a little recording for radio stations who'd like to use it. It mentions the most dangerous things drivers can do. Frequently, they mention tailgating at highway speeds as something which causes more pileups than anything else, and I'm sure that's true. In 35 years of driving, I've never spoken to ANYONE who's gotten a ticket for tailgating on a highway. Give me an unmarked car, and I could easily write tickets all day long for that offense. But, it can't be measured with a radar or laser gun, so the cops never do it. Never say never - I drive an unmarked Crown Vic, and I generally don't have a radar unit in my car. Most of my citations are for "Failure to observe a traffic control device," meaning that the person ran a stop sign, red light, or whatever. I write speeding tickets as well, but usually only on special traffic details that I get somehow assigned to. I'd rather be pulling over the people who drive around town blatantly violating a plethora of traffic laws than a speeder. You know the ones - dog in their lap while talking on the cell phone and eating a Big Mac driving a 1970 station wagon that smells like a burnt oil refinery and could easily replace the mosquito control vehicle. No turn signals, one working brake light (if any), cracked windshield, broken antenna, with all of his hospital paperwork strewn from one side of the dashboard to the other. Then you pull them over and their license is suspended (which of course they had no idea it was suspended). They root through the pile of empty Natural Ice cans to get their expired registration out of the glove compartment. Of course when he opens the glove compartment a bag of weed falls out onto the pile of beer cans, but it isn't his - nope. His FRIEND must have left it in there. You know, those type of people - THOSE are the ones that I like. -- -= swatcop =- "If it wasn't for stupid people I'd be unemployed." |
#137
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe it's time we re-examined this "it's a priviledge, not a right" line. I
guess when horses were the prevalent mode of transportation, driving an auto was a "priviledge" of the rich, who could afford them. Nowadays, how would one survive without a car, at least in most parts of the U.S.? You'd get killed trying to ride a bike to work in a lot of big cities, run over by those "Priviledged" auto drivers. Driver's licenses are still just another revenue generation tool, since obviously there are plenty of accidents by all those "trained and approved" drivers. It reminds me of those parents who get their kid something like a bike or horse, just to have something to take away to punish them later. "swatcop" wrote in message news ![]() "WaIIy" wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:46:03 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: The seatbelts are the only thing that keep you behind the wheel in such instances. If you're on the median at 50+ mph and you're still driving, you've probably avoided hitting other cars. You have a much better chance of finishing the episode alive if you're behind the wheel snugly so you can drive. Only an idiot would want to be bouncing around the car. Doug, these laws that take away personal choice are just that. Although I agree with you on the child protection issues, I strongly disagree with seatbelt and helmet laws for adults. No, I don't want to hear about how much it's costing us in medical bills, blah, blah, blah. It's erosion of personal freedom, plain and simple. I disagree - it saves lives, plain and simple. Driving is a priveledge, not a constitutional right, therefore there are rules. Personal freedom purtains to freedom of religion, etc., not risking other people's lives or your own. -- -= swatcop =- "If it wasn't for stupid people I'd be unemployed." |
#138
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"swatcop" wrote in message
om... I like the way you think. -- So do my cop friends. I'd never be able to function that job, though. I have no patience for procedures and paperwork. :-) |
#139
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"swatcop" wrote in message
om... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... If you want to talk about extremes, consider a situation where there's NO enforcement. Then, citizens will take matters into their own hands. Not a good idea. Better yet, how about life in other less civilized countries? You steal, they cut off your hand. You hit someone with your car and kill them, they shoot you right there on the spot. And these crybabies are complaining about having to wear a seatbelt, and a seatbelt's only purpose or function in life is to save lives. Unreal. You know, the crime rate is a lot lower in those other countries. Maybe we should adopt some of their methods. I've been reading a pretty scary book about what life is like in Colombia. Scary stuff. Paramilitary (works for someone, but nobody's sure who - maybe sugar plantation or factory owners) comes to a town and puts lists of names in a town square. The list contains people who the pares believe are guilty of crimes like theft or drug-running. Within a few days, everyone on the list is gunned down in the street. Sometimes, they pith them, instead. Remember pithing frogs in biology class? A needle through the base of the skull? It apparently works with people as well. Next the guerillas come to town and track down the paras they believe were responsible for the executions, and administer their own justice. Sometimes, the police, who are powerless, are blamed, so they are murdered. The townspeople *know* the cops were innocent because nobody in town tipped them off about which bad guys needed to be "handled". The cops are actually a liability because they're prime targets of the guerillas. Innocent bystanders are often hurt when guerillas drive by firing machine guns at a group of cops. The locals get nervous when the police decide to build a new police station right in the middle of town. Very confusing. Very weird. Happening right now. By the way, the cops aren't powerless for lack of weaponry. We send them sophisticated stuff. They're powerless because the populace is afraid to communicate with the cops. Too dangerous. |
#140
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith" wrote in message
... Maybe it's time we re-examined this "it's a priviledge, not a right" line. I guess when horses were the prevalent mode of transportation, driving an auto was a "priviledge" of the rich, who could afford them. Nowadays, how would one survive without a car, at least in most parts of the U.S.? You'd get killed trying to ride a bike to work in a lot of big cities, run over by those "Priviledged" auto drivers. Driver's licenses are still just another revenue generation tool, since obviously there are plenty of accidents by all those "trained and approved" drivers. You have a right to travel anyplace you want in this country without some goon asking to see "ze paperz, pleaze". How you travel is in no way guaranteed, mentioned, suggested or alluded to in the bill of rights or the constitution. I'll tell ya what, though - if you'll do this, I'll forget the previous paragraph and agree with you. Ready? Stand in a busy airport. Have yourself chained to an immovable object. Distribute rotten fruit to the first 200 people who walk by. Distribute baseball size stones to perhaps 50 of those people, and loaded pistols to perhaps a dozen people. Using a bullhorn, announce that training and testing for airline pilots is a violation of some imaginary rights and should be ended immediately. Continue making this announcement until you lose consciousness. Let me know which airport. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Marine stereos | General | |||
Coastie Tales | General | |||
marine trader light bulb wanted. | General | |||
Marine Insurance for older boats | General | |||
Marine Goop glue = how to remove? | General |