What I can't figure out is how does the discussion about a weather forecast
have anything to do with thinking or reasoning. The only thing that showed
a lack of thinking or reasoning is when he said he would get 5' waves in 2 -
3' of water.


"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
only hoary would differeniate between "thinking" and "reasoning".

... incapable of abstract thinking or reasoning.

It was small compared to the Great Lakes, but the lake had a fetch of a few
miles.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
I have been on small lakes in a storm with 20 knot winds, that had 3 to 5
ft. waves,

no you haven't. 20 knots winds take a long time and long fetch to get to
be 3
to 5 foot waves, and even then you need water most usually deeper than is
found
in a "small lake".

Poor Harry, forced to begging for attention in rec.boats.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:
only hoary would differeniate between "thinking" and "reasoning".

... incapable of abstract thinking or reasoning.





Thinking is thought, cogitation, meditation, mental action or activity,
while reasoning is the process by which one judgement is deduced from
another or others which are given. One can think abstractly or reason
abstractly, separately or simultaneously. One can also think or reason
without involving the abstract, as it were.

How's your narrative thinking? Better than your abstract thinking?





--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

Harry tell us about the 4' waves breaking through the streets of Baltimore.
There might have been a storm surge that flooded part of the town in 4' of
water, you might have had waves breaking at the shore line that were 4'
high, but there were no breaking waves running through the streets.

You have lost your ability to think or reason, abstractly or otherwise.


"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:2GzTc.124281$8_6.41293@attbi_s04...
Poor Harry, forced to begging for attention in rec.boats.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:
only hoary would differeniate between "thinking" and "reasoning".

... incapable of abstract thinking or reasoning.





Thinking is thought, cogitation, meditation, mental action or activity,
while reasoning is the process by which one judgement is deduced from
another or others which are given. One can think abstractly or reason
abstractly, separately or simultaneously. One can also think or reason
without involving the abstract, as it were.

How's your narrative thinking? Better than your abstract thinking?





--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

hoary ain't normal.

What I can't figure out is how does the discussion about a weather forecast
have anything to do with thinking or reasoning. The only thing that showed
a lack of thinking or reasoning is when he said he would get 5' waves in 2 -
3' of water.


"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
only hoary would differeniate between "thinking" and "reasoning".

... incapable of abstract thinking or reasoning.

a "few miles" ain't nuthin in the context of five foot waves in 20 knot winds.
nuthin.

zero. zip. nada. squat.


It was small compared to the Great Lakes, but the lake had a fetch of a few
miles.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
I have been on small lakes in a storm with 20 knot winds, that had 3 to 5
ft. waves,

no you haven't. 20 knots winds take a long time and long fetch to get to
be 3
to 5 foot waves, and even then you need water most usually deeper than is
found
in a "small lake".

THAT is incredibly interesting. Thanks for sharing with us.

From:
Date: 8/14/2004 10:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: een automatically sent by Micromus

"Anonymous Poster" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:03:56 -0400 "jim--" wrote..


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
The latest forecast for Chesapeake Bay:

Tonight
NE wind increasing to 25 to 30 kt with gusts up to 40 kt...then N 35
to
40 kt with gusts up to 50 kt after midnight. Waves 2 ft...building to
5
ft after midnight. Widespread heavy rain and scattered tstms in the
evening tapering to scattered showers overnight.


Gusts up to 50 mph? On the Bay...

Too bad it'll be dark...watching five footers or more on the Bay would
be a sight to see.






Really? 5 footers in Sandusky Bay off Lake Erie are not uncommon. Why
are
you so excited about 5 footers in the Chesapeake? I would guess the
Bay
has
some pretty nasty seas at times...5 footers are certainly not nasty
although
the winds forecasted certainly are.

Have you ever been out in anything other than 1-2 footers Harry?




The Bay is relatively shallow, Dennis, and where we are, not very wide.

As is Lake Erie and Sandusky Bay. 5 footers on either of them are not
uncommon.


There are significant portions of the shoreline barely above sea level.
With any kind of wind, five foot waves riding on top of a storm surge on
top of water that may only be three to four feet deep out a half mile to
nearly a mile in some places leads to an interesting visual.

What sort of storm surge is expected on the Bay? I do not recall any talk
about storm surges on the Chesapeake Bay resulting from Charley. Got a
link?


I finally figured you out Jim. Krause pays to to post.


Yes, you got me. Krause pays *to to post*.

He-he-he. Another Krause sock puppet bites the dust.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:




You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today.



Whatever you say Harry Krause, Harry Hope (I forgot the rest of your
sock
puppet names) or whatever your name is today.

You are just too easy Krause.

I suppose it makes you feel better to repeat yourself like that, Dennis,
but the fact remands that you are about as dumb as a post. Your ability
to comprehend is limited, and you simply aren't worth much effort when
an explanation is needed. What grade of school were you able to
complete? Did you get through high school? Were you the subject of
social promotion?




BTW: How does it feel to know I am always in your mind and eating away
at
you? He-he-he.


You're delusional.


Then why the need to reply. LMAO!!!

jim--
He is obsessed with you and Bush. I guess he is upset when someone is
successful, and he has nothing to be proud of.

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:




You're not very bright, Bennis. Or whatever your name is today.



Whatever you say Harry Krause, Harry Hope (I forgot the rest of your
sock
puppet names) or whatever your name is today.

You are just too easy Krause.

I suppose it makes you feel better to repeat yourself like that,
Dennis,
but the fact remands that you are about as dumb as a post. Your
ability
to comprehend is limited, and you simply aren't worth much effort when
an explanation is needed. What grade of school were you able to
complete? Did you get through high school? Were you the subject of
social promotion?




BTW: How does it feel to know I am always in your mind and eating away
at
you? He-he-he.


You're delusional.


Then why the need to reply. LMAO!!!