Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:50:23 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message - Isn't it nice that the corporate representative worked so hard to shift the blame or guilt from overselling the flight from his company onto the passengers in the terminal? Even with this touching story, poor Harry can't even find something decent to say about humanity. What a louse. Trouble is, though, he's right. When I buy a hunting or fishing license, I know the score. I might get lucky, I might not. It is a risk I understand and accept. When I buy a ticket, I have a reasonable expectation of *using* that ticket to claim *my* seat, NOT as a receipt for a hunting license. And definitely not becoming an unwilling participant in a lottery for the seat I paid for.... with doe-eyed passengers looking on to see how hard-hearted I am.... and by proxy, passing the blame for lack of surrender on to anybody else with a greater conscience. Harry is clearly correct, the unpatriotic and un-American persons involved were the sellers of tickets that they *knew* were not good and would not be honored. Suppose they told these service men and women up front? In another thread we discussed the morality of paying for goods and services received. Do you think a no-show will receive a refund? Even if that flight was overbooked and people were turned away. This is a crappy way to do business. My point (and I hope Harry's) is that these people did the right thing and performed a greater good for these service men and women to show their appreciation for their sacrifices to our country and *right the wrong* done to them by a transportation system driven by corporate greed and paid to stay in business by the Federal Government. My $.02. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:50:23 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message - Isn't it nice that the corporate representative worked so hard to shift the blame or guilt from overselling the flight from his company onto the passengers in the terminal? Even with this touching story, poor Harry can't even find something decent to say about humanity. What a louse. Trouble is, though, he's right. When I buy a hunting or fishing license, I know the score. I might get lucky, I might not. It is a risk I understand and accept. When I buy a ticket, I have a reasonable expectation of *using* that ticket to claim *my* seat, NOT as a receipt for a hunting license. And definitely not becoming an unwilling participant in a lottery for the seat I paid for.... with doe-eyed passengers looking on to see how hard-hearted I am.... and by proxy, passing the blame for lack of surrender on to anybody else with a greater conscience. Harry is clearly correct, the unpatriotic and un-American persons involved were the sellers of tickets that they *knew* were not good and would not be honored. Suppose they told these service men and women up front? In another thread we discussed the morality of paying for goods and services received. Do you think a no-show will receive a refund? Even if that flight was overbooked and people were turned away. This is a crappy way to do business. My point (and I hope Harry's) is that these people did the right thing and performed a greater good for these service men and women to show their appreciation for their sacrifices to our country and *right the wrong* done to them by a transportation system driven by corporate greed and paid to stay in business by the Federal Government. My $.02. Indeed, the passengers who agreed to be "bumped" to allow the service personnel to board were gracious and generous. The corporation behaved like - your typical corporation. Further, it really annoys me that the service personnel have to pay for their own tickets to get home on leave from a war zone. It's one thing to pay for your ticket home from a billet in Germany; it's quite another to have to pay to get home for two weeks from a frippin' war. Why isn't Bush stepping up to the plate to do something for these warriors? Why? Because he's a detached pile of crap. -- Email sent to is never read. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Kearns" wrote in message Very well put Gene. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The airlines oversell, figuring on no shows. One of the only business
entities that sell a product that is not stock piled. The no shows except for the very restricted tickets get to use that ticket for another flight with no, or vetty little, penalty. Bill "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:50:23 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message - Isn't it nice that the corporate representative worked so hard to shift the blame or guilt from overselling the flight from his company onto the passengers in the terminal? Even with this touching story, poor Harry can't even find something decent to say about humanity. What a louse. Trouble is, though, he's right. When I buy a hunting or fishing license, I know the score. I might get lucky, I might not. It is a risk I understand and accept. When I buy a ticket, I have a reasonable expectation of *using* that ticket to claim *my* seat, NOT as a receipt for a hunting license. And definitely not becoming an unwilling participant in a lottery for the seat I paid for.... with doe-eyed passengers looking on to see how hard-hearted I am.... and by proxy, passing the blame for lack of surrender on to anybody else with a greater conscience. Harry is clearly correct, the unpatriotic and un-American persons involved were the sellers of tickets that they *knew* were not good and would not be honored. Suppose they told these service men and women up front? In another thread we discussed the morality of paying for goods and services received. Do you think a no-show will receive a refund? Even if that flight was overbooked and people were turned away. This is a crappy way to do business. My point (and I hope Harry's) is that these people did the right thing and performed a greater good for these service men and women to show their appreciation for their sacrifices to our country and *right the wrong* done to them by a transportation system driven by corporate greed and paid to stay in business by the Federal Government. My $.02. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calif Bill wrote:
The airlines oversell, figuring on no shows. One of the only business entities that sell a product that is not stock piled. The no shows except for the very restricted tickets get to use that ticket for another flight with no, or vetty little, penalty. Bill Yeah, we all know how it works, Bill. Interesting that the airlines are not subject to legal penalties for selling a product they don't have abd can't claim is out of stock. But, then, the rules are different for corporations. -- Email sent to is never read. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: The airlines oversell, figuring on no shows. One of the only business entities that sell a product that is not stock piled. The no shows except for the very restricted tickets get to use that ticket for another flight with no, or vetty little, penalty. Bill Yeah, we all know how it works, Bill. Interesting that the airlines are not subject to legal penalties for selling a product they don't have abd can't claim is out of stock. But, then, the rules are different for corporations. They do get penalized. They pay bump fees to the bumpies. Who you go for the case where you buy a ticket and that ticket is good on only the flight it is sold for? You go on a business trip and have to change the itinerary. You willing to write off 50% of the ticket? Seems as if the Unions are even more crooked than the corporations. What union investment fund had insider trading? Even the spokes person got enough money to buy a $300k+ Lobsta boat. What about all those AFL /CIO pension fund scandals? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calif Bill wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: The airlines oversell, figuring on no shows. One of the only business entities that sell a product that is not stock piled. The no shows except for the very restricted tickets get to use that ticket for another flight with no, or vetty little, penalty. Bill Yeah, we all know how it works, Bill. Interesting that the airlines are not subject to legal penalties for selling a product they don't have abd can't claim is out of stock. But, then, the rules are different for corporations. They do get penalized. They pay bump fees to the bumpies. Well, that's a wonderful way to do business, eh? Who you go for the case where you buy a ticket and that ticket is good on only the flight it is sold for? Huh? Try that again in English, please. -- Email sent to is never read. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: Who you go for the case where you buy a ticket and that ticket is good on only the flight it is sold for? Huh? Try that again in English, please. I guess you really are very anal. make the "Who" "Would" Buy a ticket and you use it or lose it. Would |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|