Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,257
Default 4 stroke compared to the high thrust 4 stroke

On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:52:00 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/15/20 12:44 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/20 8:44 AM, Justan O. wrote:
On 11/14/20 9:53 PM, gary hess wrote:
can anyone tell me the difference?

Thrust

Ahh, yes...the very quality all the women in your life said you lacked.


You seem to still be stuck in angst of your teen years.



Bilious, I don't give the uninformed opinions of Trumpsters any mind. I
had a pretty angst-free teenagehood, to coin a word.


Yet you respond to them all. Maybe it's just your narcissism acting up.
--

Freedom Isn't Free!
  #22   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,257
Default 4 stroke compared to the high thrust 4 stroke

On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:31:29 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/15/20 9:03 AM, Justan O. wrote:
On 11/15/20 7:38 AM, True North wrote:
On Sunday, 15 November 2020 at 00:07:04 UTC-4, Alex wrote:
True North wrote: On Saturday, 14 November 2020 at 23:10:58 UTC-4,
Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/14/20 9:53 PM, gary hess wrote: can
anyone tell me the difference? The "high thrust" motors
typically have larger lower units, higher gear ratios, and
different props than "standard" outboards , but I believe the
powerheads are the same in both types. -- *Lock Trump Up!*
Yes, that was the case with the Mercury 60 Big Foot that came with
the 16 and a half foot Legend bow rider I owned a few years ago. They
claimed it had the same lower end as the 90 and had a special larger
high thrust propeller. I believe it was originally popular for
pontoon boats.
"They claimed"? That's hilarious! Only you buy boats on a salesman's
word and look what that got you. The reason they are popular for
pontoon boats is that they can move a heavier load, at slow speed,
more efficiently. They were never designed for the hull style, and
weight, of the POS Legend you wasted your money on. They probably had
a Bigfoot laying around at the dealership and sold it to the first
dip**** to walk in. That salesman probably got a nice commission for
unloading that from their inventory.
"Jorge"


Boy...y'all are getting more ditzy by the day.
The boat manufacturer offered the 60 Big foot as an upgrade from the
base 40 hp outboard.
Y'all should keep your pie hole shut unless you know what you're
blathering about.


Jorge does know what he is talking about. You probably got an unbelievable
deal to take that mistake off Legends hands.


Alex is the dweeb who allegedly pays full price or more for
non-collectible, run of the mill firearms, and usually not even the best
of their kind.


Unlike you, he doesn't make up bull**** stories about them!
--

Freedom Isn't Free!
  #23   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2020
Posts: 492
Default 4 stroke compared to the high thrust 4 stroke

On 11/15/20 1:50 PM, John wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 14:15:02 -0000 (UTC), "Justan O." wrote:

On 11/15/20 8:48 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/20 8:44 AM, Justan O. wrote:
On 11/14/20 9:53 PM, gary hess wrote:
can anyone tell me the difference?

Thrust

Ahh, yes...the very quality all the women in your life said you lacked.

--
*Lock Trump Up!*


I'm surprised your little woman hasn't lopped off your thruster. I'm sure
she tired early of a 350 pound gorilla thrusting at her delicate little
****.


LOL!
--

Freedom Isn't Free!


A bit gross, I admit but he's gotten so dense that its hard to insult him
anymore.
  #24   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default 4 stroke compared to the high thrust 4 stroke

On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 19:44:03 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

On Saturday, 14 November 2020 at 23:10:58 UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/14/20 9:53 PM, gary hess wrote:
can anyone tell me the difference?

The "high thrust" motors typically have larger lower units, higher gear
ratios, and different props than "standard" outboards , but I believe
the powerheads are the same in both types.

--
*Lock Trump Up!*



Yes, that was the case with the Mercury 60 Big Foot that came with the 16 and a half foot Legend bow rider I owned a few years ago. They claimed it had the same lower end as the 90 and had a special larger high thrust propeller. I believe it was originally popular for pontoon boats.


The big foot(Merc) high thrust (Yamaha) allows a larger diameter prop.
The bigger L/U on a light mono hull is probably not a good idea. The
standard model will get you a little more speed because of less drag.
If you look at the L/U on racing hulls the first thing you see is a
very thin gear case. The advantage of a big foot on a work boat might
be useful but not a speed boat.
If you have a pontoon or other displacement hull, swinging that bigger
wheel will give you much better low speed performance, like docking in
the wind and have minimal WOT impact since you are basically pushing a
brick through the water anyway. If you have a ski boat, that extra
thrust will help you yank skiers out of the water faster but people
don't typically have the 40-70 HP motors on ski boats.
  #25   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2020
Posts: 307
Default 4 stroke compared to the high thrust 4 stroke

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/20 8:44 AM, Justan O. wrote:
On 11/14/20 9:53 PM, gary hess wrote:
can anyone tell me the difference?


Thrust


Ahh, yes...the very quality all the women in your life said you lacked.

Interesting that some newbie asks a reasonable question here and a
couple of the reigning assholes, of which "Harry" is a ranking member,
immediately turn it into trash.


  #26   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2020
Posts: 307
Default 4 stroke compared to the high thrust 4 stroke

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/20 9:03 AM, Justan O. wrote:
On 11/15/20 7:38 AM, True North wrote:
On Sunday, 15 November 2020 at 00:07:04 UTC-4, Alex wrote:
True North wrote: On Saturday, 14 November 2020 at 23:10:58
UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/14/20 9:53 PM, gary hess wrote:
can anyone tell me the difference? The "high thrust"
motors typically have larger lower units, higher gear ratios,
and different props than "standard" outboards , but I believe
the powerheads are the same in both types. -- *Lock Trump
Up!* Yes, that was the case with the Mercury 60 Big Foot that
came with the 16 and a half foot Legend bow rider I owned a few
years ago. They claimed it had the same lower end as the 90 and had
a special larger high thrust propeller. I believe it was originally
popular for pontoon boats.
"They claimed"? That's hilarious! Only you buy boats on a
salesman's word and look what that got you. The reason they are
popular for pontoon boats is that they can move a heavier load, at
slow speed, more efficiently. They were never designed for the hull
style, and weight, of the POS Legend you wasted your money on. They
probably had a Bigfoot laying around at the dealership and sold it
to the first dip**** to walk in. That salesman probably got a nice
commission for unloading that from their inventory.
"Jorge"


Boy...y'all are getting more ditzy by the day.
The boat manufacturer offered the 60 Big foot as an upgrade from the
base 40 hp outboard.
Y'all should keep your pie hole shut unless you know what you're
blathering about.


Jorge does know what he is talking about. You probably got an
unbelievable
deal to take that mistake off Legends hands.


Alex is the dweeb who allegedly pays full price or more for
non-collectible, run of the mill firearms, and usually not even the
best of their kind.


You have no idea what the value is.Â* Some are prototypes that can't be
valued.Â* Also, these are charity auctions that offer a small tax
deduction.Â* You wouldn't understand taxes so I won't bore you with the
details.
  #27   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2020
Posts: 307
Default 4 stroke compared to the high thrust 4 stroke

wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 19:44:03 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

On Saturday, 14 November 2020 at 23:10:58 UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/14/20 9:53 PM, gary hess wrote:
can anyone tell me the difference?

The "high thrust" motors typically have larger lower units, higher gear
ratios, and different props than "standard" outboards , but I believe
the powerheads are the same in both types.

--
*Lock Trump Up!*


Yes, that was the case with the Mercury 60 Big Foot that came with the 16 and a half foot Legend bow rider I owned a few years ago. They claimed it had the same lower end as the 90 and had a special larger high thrust propeller. I believe it was originally popular for pontoon boats.

The big foot(Merc) high thrust (Yamaha) allows a larger diameter prop.
The bigger L/U on a light mono hull is probably not a good idea. The
standard model will get you a little more speed because of less drag.
If you look at the L/U on racing hulls the first thing you see is a
very thin gear case. The advantage of a big foot on a work boat might
be useful but not a speed boat.
If you have a pontoon or other displacement hull, swinging that bigger
wheel will give you much better low speed performance, like docking in
the wind and have minimal WOT impact since you are basically pushing a
brick through the water anyway. If you have a ski boat, that extra
thrust will help you yank skiers out of the water faster but people
don't typically have the 40-70 HP motors on ski boats.


That's not what the salesman told him.Â* He said it was a free upgrade!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I have a 1973 Johnson 135 I just bought it in the guy told me it'sfor stroke is there any possible way that it is cuz I sure as heck don'tthink it is I think it's two stroke [email protected] General 2 June 21st 18 03:31 AM
4 stroke outboard for 2 stroke design - 14 ft skiff ceuthophilus Boat Building 1 September 12th 08 05:00 AM
2004 9.9 Mercury - 2 stroke or 4 stroke? Donald MacQueen General 6 July 27th 04 04:28 AM
4 stroke produces more "thrust"???? RG General 24 December 10th 03 03:14 AM
Outboard HP - 2-Stroke vs. 4-Stroke - no such thing as FINAL Courtney Thomas Cruising 1 August 25th 03 02:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017