On 3/7/20 3:48 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/7/20 2:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process
the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters
calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again.

Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected
POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn.

Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win
because it was *her* turn.

I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda
and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing
are in the best interests of the country and her
positions were fully supported with realistic objectives.

But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply
because she's a woman.

Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree.


You support a POTUS whose interests are in the interest of his buddies
and family and not in the best interests of this country.


He seems to be doing better for the country than the last bunch of
Presidents. Getting us out of wars the others started or expanded.
Economy actually doing well. Seems as if he best interests of his family
and buddies is great for the country.


Hahahah. Nitwit.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/7/20 3:48 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/7/20 2:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process
the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters
calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again.

Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected
POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn.

Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win
because it was *her* turn.

I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda
and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing
are in the best interests of the country and her
positions were fully supported with realistic objectives.

But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply
because she's a woman.

Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree.


You support a POTUS whose interests are in the interest of his buddies
and family and not in the best interests of this country.


He seems to be doing better for the country than the last bunch of
Presidents. Getting us out of wars the others started or expanded.
Economy actually doing well. Seems as if he best interests of his family
and buddies is great for the country.


Hahahah. Nitwit.


What is wrong about the statements, terrorist?

On 3/7/2020 3:50 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/7/20 3:48 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/7/20 2:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process
the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters
calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again.

Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected
POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn.

Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win
because it was *her* turn.

I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda
and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing
are in the best interests of the country and her
positions were fully supported with realistic objectives.

But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply
because she's a woman.

Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree.


You support a POTUS whose interests are in the interest of his buddies
and family and not in the best interests of this country.


He seems to be doing better for the country than the last bunch of
Presidents.Â*Â* Getting us out of wars the others started or expanded.
Economy actually doing well.Â*Â* Seems as if he best interests of his
family
and buddies is great for the country.




Hahahah. Nitwit.

ha. When all else fails .... insult!


--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com