Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Default ****ed off women

On 3/7/20 3:16 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:42:10 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process
the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters
calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again.

Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected
POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn.

Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win
because it was *her* turn.

I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda
and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing
are in the best interests of the country and her
positions were fully supported with realistic objectives.

But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply
because she's a woman.

Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree.


===

Personally I find Warren's tone shrill and over emoted, a bit like
Hillary in some respects. However, the real deal breaker for me was
trying to pass herself off as a native American all those years. What
an insult to real native Americans, and what an insight into her true
character.


You boyz are hilarious. You support Donald Pig Vomit, a man whose
behavior and statements are a continuous insult, and you don't like
Warren because you find her shrill and over-emoted. No one in politics
is more shrill and over-emoted than Trump.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,650
Default ****ed off women

On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 15:40:25 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 3/7/20 3:16 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:42:10 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process
the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters
calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again.

Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected
POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn.

Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win
because it was *her* turn.

I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda
and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing
are in the best interests of the country and her
positions were fully supported with realistic objectives.

But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply
because she's a woman.

Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree.


===

Personally I find Warren's tone shrill and over emoted, a bit like
Hillary in some respects. However, the real deal breaker for me was
trying to pass herself off as a native American all those years. What
an insult to real native Americans, and what an insight into her true
character.


You boyz are hilarious. You support Donald Pig Vomit, a man whose
behavior and statements are a continuous insult, and you don't like
Warren because you find her shrill and over-emoted. No one in politics
is more shrill and over-emoted than Trump.


===

Stop me if I'm wrong but I believe we were talking about Warren, not
Trump. Try to pay attention and stay on topic.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Default ****ed off women

On 3/7/20 3:56 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 15:40:25 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 3/7/20 3:16 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:42:10 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process
the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters
calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again.

Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected
POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn.

Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win
because it was *her* turn.

I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda
and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing
are in the best interests of the country and her
positions were fully supported with realistic objectives.

But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply
because she's a woman.

Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree.

===

Personally I find Warren's tone shrill and over emoted, a bit like
Hillary in some respects. However, the real deal breaker for me was
trying to pass herself off as a native American all those years. What
an insult to real native Americans, and what an insight into her true
character.


You boyz are hilarious. You support Donald Pig Vomit, a man whose
behavior and statements are a continuous insult, and you don't like
Warren because you find her shrill and over-emoted. No one in politics
is more shrill and over-emoted than Trump.


===

Stop me if I'm wrong but I believe we were talking about Warren, not
Trump. Try to pay attention and stay on topic.


Just pointing out your political hypocrisy. You dislike behavior in a
woman you find acceptable in a man. And Trump is worse in both regards.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2018
Posts: 587
Default ****ed off women

Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 3/7/20 3:56 PM, wrote: On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 15:40:25 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/7/20 3:16 PM, wrote: On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:42:10 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again. Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn. Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win because it was *her* turn. I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing are in the best interests of the country and her positions were fully supported with realistic objectives. But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply because she's a woman. Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree. === Personally I find Warren's tone shrill and over emoted, a bit like Hillary in some respects. However, the real deal breaker for me was trying to pass herself off as a native American all those years. What an insult to real native Americans, and what an insight into her true character. You boyz are hilarious. You support Donald Pig Vomit, a man whose behavior and statements are a continuous insult, and you don't like Warren because you find her shrill and over-emoted. No one in politics is more shrill and over-emoted than Trump. === Stop me if I'm wrong but I believe we were talking about Warren, not Trump. Try to pay attention and stay on topic. Just pointing out your political hypocrisy. You dislike behavior in a woman you find acceptable in a man. And Trump is worse in both regards.


And Biden is pimping the lgbt vote in Orlando today. Go Joey.
--
..


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,961
Default ****ed off women

On 3/7/2020 3:58 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/7/20 3:56 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 15:40:25 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 3/7/20 3:16 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:42:10 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process
the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters
calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again.

Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected
POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn.

Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win
because it was *her* turn.

I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda
and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing
are in the best interests of the country and her
positions were fully supported with realistic objectives.

But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply
because she's a woman.

Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree.

===

Personally I find Warren's tone shrill and over emoted, a bit like
Hillary in some respects.Â* However, the real deal breaker for me was
trying to pass herself off as a native American all those years.Â* What
an insult to real native Americans, and what an insight into her true
character.


You boyz are hilarious. You support Donald Pig Vomit, a man whose
behavior and statements are a continuous insult, and you don't like
Warren because you find her shrill and over-emoted. No one in politics
is more shrill and over-emoted than Trump.


===

Stop me if I'm wrong but I believe we were talking about Warren, not
Trump.Â* Try to pay attention and stay on topic.


Just pointing out your political hypocrisy. You dislike behavior in a
woman you find acceptable in a man. And Trump is worse in both regards.




Harry, you really *are* losing it.

The subject was about women who think a woman should be elected simply
because she's a woman .... because it's a woman's turn.

Trump isn't part of that equation nor was he even mentioned in the
previous posts.



--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com



  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default ****ed off women

On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 15:40:25 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 3/7/20 3:16 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:42:10 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process
the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters
calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again.

Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected
POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn.

Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win
because it was *her* turn.

I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda
and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing
are in the best interests of the country and her
positions were fully supported with realistic objectives.

But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply
because she's a woman.

Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree.


===

Personally I find Warren's tone shrill and over emoted, a bit like
Hillary in some respects. However, the real deal breaker for me was
trying to pass herself off as a native American all those years. What
an insult to real native Americans, and what an insight into her true
character.


You boyz are hilarious. You support Donald Pig Vomit, a man whose
behavior and statements are a continuous insult, and you don't like
Warren because you find her shrill and over-emoted. No one in politics
is more shrill and over-emoted than Trump.


But what about?

Isn't that what you used to always say?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Now I am pissed ... Mr. Luddite[_4_] General 142 January 26th 18 10:15 PM
Nancy is pissed ... [email protected] General 8 October 17th 17 05:55 PM
Nancy is pissed ... [email protected] General 3 October 16th 17 12:19 PM
Nancy is pissed ... Bill[_12_] General 0 October 16th 17 12:57 AM
Boy, I'm I pissed today!!! Thom Stewart ASA 4 February 10th 04 06:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017