Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
****ed off women
On 3/7/20 3:48 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/7/20 2:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again. Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn. Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win because it was *her* turn. I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing are in the best interests of the country and her positions were fully supported with realistic objectives. But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply because she's a woman. Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree. You support a POTUS whose interests are in the interest of his buddies and family and not in the best interests of this country. He seems to be doing better for the country than the last bunch of Presidents. Getting us out of wars the others started or expanded. Economy actually doing well. Seems as if he best interests of his family and buddies is great for the country. Hahahah. Nitwit. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
****ed off women
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/7/20 3:48 PM, Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/7/20 2:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again. Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn. Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win because it was *her* turn. I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing are in the best interests of the country and her positions were fully supported with realistic objectives. But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply because she's a woman. Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree. You support a POTUS whose interests are in the interest of his buddies and family and not in the best interests of this country. He seems to be doing better for the country than the last bunch of Presidents. Getting us out of wars the others started or expanded. Economy actually doing well. Seems as if he best interests of his family and buddies is great for the country. Hahahah. Nitwit. What is wrong about the statements, terrorist? |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
****ed off women
On 3/7/2020 3:50 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/7/20 3:48 PM, Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/7/20 2:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again. Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn. Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win because it was *her* turn. I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing are in the best interests of the country and her positions were fully supported with realistic objectives. But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply because she's a woman. Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree. You support a POTUS whose interests are in the interest of his buddies and family and not in the best interests of this country. He seems to be doing better for the country than the last bunch of Presidents.Â*Â* Getting us out of wars the others started or expanded. Economy actually doing well.Â*Â* Seems as if he best interests of his family and buddies is great for the country. Hahahah. Nitwit. ha. When all else fails .... insult! -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
****ed off women
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 3/7/20 2:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again. Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn. Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win because it was *her* turn. I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing are in the best interests of the country and her positions were fully supported with realistic objectives. But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply because she's a woman. Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree. You support a POTUS whose interests are in the interest of his buddies and family and not in the best interests of this country. Try to focus Fat Harry. It ought to be easy. There ain't much cluttering your head. -- .. ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
****ed off women
On 3/7/2020 3:41 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/7/20 2:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again. Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn. Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win because it was *her* turn. I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing are in the best interests of the country and her positions were fully supported with realistic objectives. But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply because she's a woman. Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree. You support a POTUS whose interests are in the interest of his buddies and family and not in the best interests of this country. Let me make this simple for you: 1. Trump is often a jackass. 2. Trump has done many good things to benefit the county and it's population. I realize the neurons in the ol' noggin aren't firing like they used to but hopefully this will help clear up your confusion. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
****ed off women
On Saturday, March 7, 2020 at 2:41:40 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/7/20 2:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again. Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn. Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win because it was *her* turn. I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing are in the best interests of the country and her positions were fully supported with realistic objectives. But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply because she's a woman. Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree. You support a POTUS whose interests are in the interest of his buddies and family and not in the best interests of this country. That's why you need to run, Harry. I'd vote for you... "GO HARRY, GO!!!" |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
****ed off women
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:42:10 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: With Lizzy Warren's departure from the nomination process the lefty cable networks are full of her female supporters calling foul because they lost out on a woman POTUS again. Their main complaint is that a woman should be elected POTUS because ... she's a woman ... and it's a woman's turn. Reminds me of when Hillary ran and many felt she'd win because it was *her* turn. I'd have no problem voting for a woman *if* her agenda and goals as a POTUS were consistent with what I thing are in the best interests of the country and her positions were fully supported with realistic objectives. But I am not going to support or vote for a woman simply because she's a woman. Apparently many others, including most Democrats, agree. I think women's biggest problem is, in the sanctity of the voting booth, women won't vote for a woman either. My wife is the same way. She was out there beating the drum for Fauxohontas and Klobacharred but she still said she would vote for Biden. Unfortunately they were not on the ballots we got so she voted for Bill Weld, along with me. We will be in that 1% again. In 2008, I was the only person in my precinct who voted for Paris Hilton. I felt good seeing that in the stats. My vote counted. ;-) |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
****ed off women
|
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now I am pissed ... | General | |||
Nancy is pissed ... | General | |||
Nancy is pissed ... | General | |||
Nancy is pissed ... | General | |||
Boy, I'm I pissed today!!! | ASA |