Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The Score
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:27:16 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense I have not seen any proof that the election was "fixed" in any way. Certainly there was some damaging information released but isn't that what news organizations are supposed to do? Nobody has said the released emails were not true and they indicated the Hillary team was trying to hurt Sanders as much if not more than Trump. I would think democrats would like to know that, particularly Sanders democrats. Only a democrat could call the truth "meddling". As for the trolling on Facebook, the dossier and the data mining, you have to blame Zuckerberg along with a russian company and the Brits. Why aren't you saying the Brits meddled in the election too? One of their intelligence officers was involved along with one of their corporations. Isn't that pretty much what you say about Russia? |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The Score
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The Score
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 06:00:58 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:27:16 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense I have not seen any proof that the election was "fixed" in any way. "So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense - if it's Trump? Note, you said it, not me. You're ****ing crazy." Chopping as you did is a very poor practice. I just questioned the "fixed election" part of your rant so we could take your points one at a time. When you preface an entire scenario on a lie, the rest does not rise to the level of being taken seriously. How was it "fixed"? If you can't describe the "fix" the rest falls from it's own weight. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The Score
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The Score
On 3/30/2018 1:16 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 06:00:58 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:27:16 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense I have not seen any proof that the election was "fixed" in any way. "So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense - if it's Trump? Note, you said it, not me. You're ****ing crazy." Chopping as you did is a very poor practice. I just questioned the "fixed election" part of your rant so we could take your points one at a time. When you preface an entire scenario on a lie, the rest does not rise to the level of being taken seriously. How was it "fixed"? If you can't describe the "fix" the rest falls from it's own weight. "If, as the left claims, Trump worked with the Russians during the campaign and the results of that collusion influenced the outcome of the election ... it still probably is not an impeachable offense, much to the dismay of some of your party members." Luddite described the fix, not me. Like I said, he's crazy. What scenario? What's to fall of it's own weight? You mean that he's crazy? You can have your own opinion on that. I won't be surprised at all at whatever the outcome of this "hunt" is. Our country has gone nuts. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The Score
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 12:16:18 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 06:00:58 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:27:16 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense I have not seen any proof that the election was "fixed" in any way. "So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense - if it's Trump? Note, you said it, not me. You're ****ing crazy." Chopping as you did is a very poor practice. I just questioned the "fixed election" part of your rant so we could take your points one at a time. When you preface an entire scenario on a lie, the rest does not rise to the level of being taken seriously. How was it "fixed"? If you can't describe the "fix" the rest falls from it's own weight. "If, as the left claims, Trump worked with the Russians during the campaign and the results of that collusion influenced the outcome of the election ... it still probably is not an impeachable offense, much to the dismay of some of your party members." Luddite described the fix, not me. Like I said, he's crazy. What scenario? What's to fall of it's own weight? You mean that he's crazy? You can have your own opinion on that. So now you admit the election wasn't "fixed"? It is pretty clear that no election district has said a single vote was altered and the count seemed to be pretty much uncontested. I am not sure where the fix would be. Was there some bull**** and backstabbing? certainly but it seemed to be more on the DNC side. All the hacks/leaks did was inform the voter. The DNC never denied any of it. Don't we want informed voters? Well maybe not if the truth makes your candidate look bad. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anyone keeping score? | General | |||
SCORE!!!! Score & SCORE!!!! | ASA | |||
The Score | ASA | |||
(( OT ) Box Score for the War | General | |||
Sco ASA 100 - Jerks 0 | ASA |