On 3/29/2018 7:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/29/18 7:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/29/2018 7:26 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/29/18 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/29/2018 5:47 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/29/18 4:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


Trump:Â* 1
Stormy: 0

and a California judge, no less !


A delay,nothing more. But have heart...plenty of new ****storms are
coming Trump's way. Will a divorce suit from Melania be among them?


I suppose.Â* Her suit will be delayed like Mueller finding collusion
with the Russians.




I think it would be surprising if she doesn't dump her sleazeball
hubby. Of course, she knew what he was before she married him, but
the scumbag cheated on her right after the new Lil Trump was born,
and apparently with quite a few other women since then. No wonder she
brushes his hand away...no telling what that hand has been on...or in.

As for Mueller, it's up to Mueller to disclose his findings and he's
also in charge of the schedule.

What are you going to do if Trump is slammed with a bunch of charges
or is an unindicted co-conspirator on some serious ****? Defend him
until the death? Claim it is "trumped up"? Fake news? Hillary's fault?


I have said several times that if Trump is indicted and found guilty of
any crimes I will concede that I have been wrong.Â* I should qualify the
"crimes" as being serious enough to put National Security at risk ...
and if so, they would be impeachable.

As for Melania, it's her business, not mine to judge.Â* Who was it who
once said:

“You know, I'm not sitting here, some little woman standing by my man
like Tammy Wynette .... I’m sitting here because I love him, and I
respect him, and I honor what he’s been through and what we’ve been
through together."

Who was *that* woman?



It is an unsettled question as to whether a sitting president can be
indicted and if indicted, tried. Therefore you are giving yourself a
hell of an out. Also, so long as the Republicans control the House, I
don't see a possibility of impeachment, no matter what. I suppose so
long as the evangelical christians have given trump a pass on his
various immoralities, melania might, too.


I've listened to many legal types trying to define what is an
impeachable offense and what isn't. Seems the consensus is that if the
crime results in putting national security at risk, it is impeachable.
If the crime does *not* put national security at risk it is probably
*not* impeachable. Same crime can have different results in other
words. Lying under oath may or may not be an impeachable offense
depending on what the person is lying about.

If, as the left claims, Trump worked with the Russians during the
campaign and the results of that collusion influenced the outcome of the
election ... it still probably is not an impeachable offense, much to
the dismay of some of your party members. That's why this whole fiasco
is a waste of time and money. Your party should be focusing on winning
the next elections rather than trying to oust Trump.

As for giving him a "pass", didn't your party give Bill Clinton a pass,
more than once? Getting a blow job in the Oval Office didn't seem to
bother many people. Why should Trump's alleged roll in the sack 12
years ago with a consenting bimbo matter?

Lastly, you are giving yourself just as much as an "out" as I am ..
perhaps more so. You complain daily about how horrible and incompetent
Trump is, claiming he's going to start a nuclear war, yet concede that
there's not much your party can do about it in the short term ...
especially those calling for his impeachment.