| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The Monday Massacre
|
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Monday Massacre
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:40:37 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/31/17 5:31 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:05:14 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:21:57 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: If media reports are accurate, nobody in his sparse cabinet nor any members of Congressional leadership were notified or even asked for their input. If that's not true, then I would gladly retract my complaint about how this was done. I still say he's acting like the CEO of a privately held company rather than the POTUS. I am starting to wonder if he knows the difference. If media reports were accurate there wouldn't have been all these 'protests' about his immigration policy. The media have been hyping the public as much as possible with bull**** stories. === The issue that Luddite is pointing out relates to his management and leadership style. As he pointed out, a management style that may work in a small, privately owned business will probably not lead to success in a large, sprawling government organization where everything is constantly under the microscope and subject to second guessing. If he alienates congressional Republicans by not keeping them in the loop, it will become very difficult for Trump to get things done. I understand that his management style is more suited to big business. But I still feel that about 90% of the hysteria out there is purposely induced by the media, especially the Washington Post. No one should be upset with Trump because his idiotic dictum resulted in a five year old boy being handcuffed for hours at Dulles airport because he posed a "security risk." The boy was reported to be a U.S. citizen with an Iranian mother. This country's president is an ignorant hate-filled flaming ass, and he is going to get us killed. More lies. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Monday Massacre
On 1/31/17 6:01 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:40:37 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/31/17 5:31 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:05:14 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:21:57 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: If media reports are accurate, nobody in his sparse cabinet nor any members of Congressional leadership were notified or even asked for their input. If that's not true, then I would gladly retract my complaint about how this was done. I still say he's acting like the CEO of a privately held company rather than the POTUS. I am starting to wonder if he knows the difference. If media reports were accurate there wouldn't have been all these 'protests' about his immigration policy. The media have been hyping the public as much as possible with bull**** stories. === The issue that Luddite is pointing out relates to his management and leadership style. As he pointed out, a management style that may work in a small, privately owned business will probably not lead to success in a large, sprawling government organization where everything is constantly under the microscope and subject to second guessing. If he alienates congressional Republicans by not keeping them in the loop, it will become very difficult for Trump to get things done. I understand that his management style is more suited to big business. But I still feel that about 90% of the hysteria out there is purposely induced by the media, especially the Washington Post. No one should be upset with Trump because his idiotic dictum resulted in a five year old boy being handcuffed for hours at Dulles airport because he posed a "security risk." The boy was reported to be a U.S. citizen with an Iranian mother. This country's president is an ignorant hate-filled flaming ass, and he is going to get us killed. More lies. Check it out, ****head. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Monday Massacre
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:08:45 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/31/17 6:01 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:40:37 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/31/17 5:31 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:05:14 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:21:57 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: If media reports are accurate, nobody in his sparse cabinet nor any members of Congressional leadership were notified or even asked for their input. If that's not true, then I would gladly retract my complaint about how this was done. I still say he's acting like the CEO of a privately held company rather than the POTUS. I am starting to wonder if he knows the difference. If media reports were accurate there wouldn't have been all these 'protests' about his immigration policy. The media have been hyping the public as much as possible with bull**** stories. === The issue that Luddite is pointing out relates to his management and leadership style. As he pointed out, a management style that may work in a small, privately owned business will probably not lead to success in a large, sprawling government organization where everything is constantly under the microscope and subject to second guessing. If he alienates congressional Republicans by not keeping them in the loop, it will become very difficult for Trump to get things done. I understand that his management style is more suited to big business. But I still feel that about 90% of the hysteria out there is purposely induced by the media, especially the Washington Post. No one should be upset with Trump because his idiotic dictum resulted in a five year old boy being handcuffed for hours at Dulles airport because he posed a "security risk." The boy was reported to be a U.S. citizen with an Iranian mother. This country's president is an ignorant hate-filled flaming ass, and he is going to get us killed. More lies. Check it out, ****head. I did. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Monday Massacre
On 1/31/2017 5:40 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/31/17 5:31 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:05:14 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:21:57 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: If media reports are accurate, nobody in his sparse cabinet nor any members of Congressional leadership were notified or even asked for their input. If that's not true, then I would gladly retract my complaint about how this was done. I still say he's acting like the CEO of a privately held company rather than the POTUS. I am starting to wonder if he knows the difference. If media reports were accurate there wouldn't have been all these 'protests' about his immigration policy. The media have been hyping the public as much as possible with bull**** stories. === The issue that Luddite is pointing out relates to his management and leadership style. As he pointed out, a management style that may work in a small, privately owned business will probably not lead to success in a large, sprawling government organization where everything is constantly under the microscope and subject to second guessing. If he alienates congressional Republicans by not keeping them in the loop, it will become very difficult for Trump to get things done. I understand that his management style is more suited to big business. But I still feel that about 90% of the hysteria out there is purposely induced by the media, especially the Washington Post. No one should be upset with Trump because his idiotic dictum resulted in a five year old boy being handcuffed for hours at Dulles airport because he posed a "security risk." The boy was reported to be a U.S. citizen with an Iranian mother. This country's president is an ignorant hate-filled flaming ass, and he is going to get us killed. I think that's a bit overblown Harry. He hasn't grown into the job yet. I am willing to bet that Monday's screw-ups are lessons he and his staff will not forget and will act differently in the future. Now it's time to see how committed *your* party is to the best interests of the country. Are they going to allow the current President to have a cabinet? Are they going to stonewall his choice for the Supreme Court? Or are they going to ignore what's in the best interests of the country and focus on what's in *their* best interests? |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Monday Massacre
On 2/1/17 7:16 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/31/2017 5:40 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/31/17 5:31 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:05:14 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:21:57 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: If media reports are accurate, nobody in his sparse cabinet nor any members of Congressional leadership were notified or even asked for their input. If that's not true, then I would gladly retract my complaint about how this was done. I still say he's acting like the CEO of a privately held company rather than the POTUS. I am starting to wonder if he knows the difference. If media reports were accurate there wouldn't have been all these 'protests' about his immigration policy. The media have been hyping the public as much as possible with bull**** stories. === The issue that Luddite is pointing out relates to his management and leadership style. As he pointed out, a management style that may work in a small, privately owned business will probably not lead to success in a large, sprawling government organization where everything is constantly under the microscope and subject to second guessing. If he alienates congressional Republicans by not keeping them in the loop, it will become very difficult for Trump to get things done. I understand that his management style is more suited to big business. But I still feel that about 90% of the hysteria out there is purposely induced by the media, especially the Washington Post. No one should be upset with Trump because his idiotic dictum resulted in a five year old boy being handcuffed for hours at Dulles airport because he posed a "security risk." The boy was reported to be a U.S. citizen with an Iranian mother. This country's president is an ignorant hate-filled flaming ass, and he is going to get us killed. I think that's a bit overblown Harry. He hasn't grown into the job yet. I am willing to bet that Monday's screw-ups are lessons he and his staff will not forget and will act differently in the future. Now it's time to see how committed *your* party is to the best interests of the country. Are they going to allow the current President to have a cabinet? Are they going to stonewall his choice for the Supreme Court? Or are they going to ignore what's in the best interests of the country and focus on what's in *their* best interests? The interests of the country will be best served by throwing as many roadblocks as possible in front of Trump and his neo-Nazi principal advisor. I agree with McConnell - the Supreme Court vacancy should be filled by the *next* person elected POTUS. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Monday Massacre
On 2/1/2017 8:12 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/1/17 7:16 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/31/2017 5:40 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/31/17 5:31 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:05:14 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:21:57 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: If media reports are accurate, nobody in his sparse cabinet nor any members of Congressional leadership were notified or even asked for their input. If that's not true, then I would gladly retract my complaint about how this was done. I still say he's acting like the CEO of a privately held company rather than the POTUS. I am starting to wonder if he knows the difference. If media reports were accurate there wouldn't have been all these 'protests' about his immigration policy. The media have been hyping the public as much as possible with bull**** stories. === The issue that Luddite is pointing out relates to his management and leadership style. As he pointed out, a management style that may work in a small, privately owned business will probably not lead to success in a large, sprawling government organization where everything is constantly under the microscope and subject to second guessing. If he alienates congressional Republicans by not keeping them in the loop, it will become very difficult for Trump to get things done. I understand that his management style is more suited to big business. But I still feel that about 90% of the hysteria out there is purposely induced by the media, especially the Washington Post. No one should be upset with Trump because his idiotic dictum resulted in a five year old boy being handcuffed for hours at Dulles airport because he posed a "security risk." The boy was reported to be a U.S. citizen with an Iranian mother. This country's president is an ignorant hate-filled flaming ass, and he is going to get us killed. I think that's a bit overblown Harry. He hasn't grown into the job yet. I am willing to bet that Monday's screw-ups are lessons he and his staff will not forget and will act differently in the future. Now it's time to see how committed *your* party is to the best interests of the country. Are they going to allow the current President to have a cabinet? Are they going to stonewall his choice for the Supreme Court? Or are they going to ignore what's in the best interests of the country and focus on what's in *their* best interests? The interests of the country will be best served by throwing as many roadblocks as possible in front of Trump and his neo-Nazi principal advisor. I agree with McConnell - the Supreme Court vacancy should be filled by the *next* person elected POTUS. Nice but aren't you a bit late and a dollar short? Trump *is* the *next* person elected POTUS he referred to when he made that statement. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Monday Massacre
On 2/1/17 11:05 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2017 8:12 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/1/17 7:16 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/31/2017 5:40 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/31/17 5:31 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:05:14 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:21:57 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: If media reports are accurate, nobody in his sparse cabinet nor any members of Congressional leadership were notified or even asked for their input. If that's not true, then I would gladly retract my complaint about how this was done. I still say he's acting like the CEO of a privately held company rather than the POTUS. I am starting to wonder if he knows the difference. If media reports were accurate there wouldn't have been all these 'protests' about his immigration policy. The media have been hyping the public as much as possible with bull**** stories. === The issue that Luddite is pointing out relates to his management and leadership style. As he pointed out, a management style that may work in a small, privately owned business will probably not lead to success in a large, sprawling government organization where everything is constantly under the microscope and subject to second guessing. If he alienates congressional Republicans by not keeping them in the loop, it will become very difficult for Trump to get things done. I understand that his management style is more suited to big business. But I still feel that about 90% of the hysteria out there is purposely induced by the media, especially the Washington Post. No one should be upset with Trump because his idiotic dictum resulted in a five year old boy being handcuffed for hours at Dulles airport because he posed a "security risk." The boy was reported to be a U.S. citizen with an Iranian mother. This country's president is an ignorant hate-filled flaming ass, and he is going to get us killed. I think that's a bit overblown Harry. He hasn't grown into the job yet. I am willing to bet that Monday's screw-ups are lessons he and his staff will not forget and will act differently in the future. Now it's time to see how committed *your* party is to the best interests of the country. Are they going to allow the current President to have a cabinet? Are they going to stonewall his choice for the Supreme Court? Or are they going to ignore what's in the best interests of the country and focus on what's in *their* best interests? The interests of the country will be best served by throwing as many roadblocks as possible in front of Trump and his neo-Nazi principal advisor. I agree with McConnell - the Supreme Court vacancy should be filled by the *next* person elected POTUS. Nice but aren't you a bit late and a dollar short? Trump *is* the *next* person elected POTUS he referred to when he made that statement. I'm referring to *the next* person. The one after trumpikins.  |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Monday Massacre
On 2/1/2017 11:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/1/17 11:05 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/1/2017 8:12 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/1/17 7:16 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/31/2017 5:40 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/31/17 5:31 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:05:14 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:21:57 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: If media reports are accurate, nobody in his sparse cabinet nor any members of Congressional leadership were notified or even asked for their input. If that's not true, then I would gladly retract my complaint about how this was done. I still say he's acting like the CEO of a privately held company rather than the POTUS. I am starting to wonder if he knows the difference. If media reports were accurate there wouldn't have been all these 'protests' about his immigration policy. The media have been hyping the public as much as possible with bull**** stories. === The issue that Luddite is pointing out relates to his management and leadership style. As he pointed out, a management style that may work in a small, privately owned business will probably not lead to success in a large, sprawling government organization where everything is constantly under the microscope and subject to second guessing. If he alienates congressional Republicans by not keeping them in the loop, it will become very difficult for Trump to get things done. I understand that his management style is more suited to big business. But I still feel that about 90% of the hysteria out there is purposely induced by the media, especially the Washington Post. No one should be upset with Trump because his idiotic dictum resulted in a five year old boy being handcuffed for hours at Dulles airport because he posed a "security risk." The boy was reported to be a U.S. citizen with an Iranian mother. This country's president is an ignorant hate-filled flaming ass, and he is going to get us killed. I think that's a bit overblown Harry. He hasn't grown into the job yet. I am willing to bet that Monday's screw-ups are lessons he and his staff will not forget and will act differently in the future. Now it's time to see how committed *your* party is to the best interests of the country. Are they going to allow the current President to have a cabinet? Are they going to stonewall his choice for the Supreme Court? Or are they going to ignore what's in the best interests of the country and focus on what's in *their* best interests? The interests of the country will be best served by throwing as many roadblocks as possible in front of Trump and his neo-Nazi principal advisor. I agree with McConnell - the Supreme Court vacancy should be filled by the *next* person elected POTUS. Nice but aren't you a bit late and a dollar short? Trump *is* the *next* person elected POTUS he referred to when he made that statement. I'm referring to *the next* person. The one after trumpikins. It's funny that some of the Dems including Chuck Schumer have suggested that the country can get along just fine with only eight Justices. They obviously are thinking the same thing. To be completely honest, the person who takes the #9 spot was a very important factor to me. I think the country is much better off with a court that has a slightly conservative complexion. It doesn't hurt anyone except possibly hard core *progressive* liberals who want the court to change it's complexion in accordance with the political wind. I think that's as dangerous as having it go too far to the right. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| One way to stop a massacre! | General | |||
| The real reasons for the Aurora massacre... | General | |||
| Ha! Big Massacre Of S.American 'Migrants' In Mexico! | General | |||
| Monday can't come too soon. | General | |||
| Chain Saw Massacre | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
