On 7/7/16 2:42 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:

"The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly
every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in
almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal
defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.�

You forgot this part:
"Warnings about the problem have been mounting. In 2002, the FBI reported that its own DNA testing found that examiners reported false hair matches more than 11 percent of the time. In the District, the only jurisdiction where defenders and prosecutors have re-investigated all FBI hair convictions, three of seven defendants whose
trials included flawed FBI testimony have been exonerated through DNA testing since 2009, and courts have exonerated two more men. All five served 20 to 30 years in prison for rape or murder.

I find it amusing that this is the same government that Harry wants to
have total control over every aspect of our lives.


You are projecting again. I've never said or intimated that I wanted
"government...to have total control over every aspect of our lives."

On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:44:53 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/7/16 2:42 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:

"The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly
every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in
almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal
defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.�

You forgot this part:
"Warnings about the problem have been mounting. In 2002, the FBI reported that its own DNA testing found that examiners reported false hair matches more than 11 percent of the time. In the District, the only jurisdiction where defenders and prosecutors have re-investigated all FBI hair convictions, three of seven defendants
whose
trials included flawed FBI testimony have been exonerated through DNA testing since 2009, and courts have exonerated two more men. All five served 20 to 30 years in prison for rape or murder.

I find it amusing that this is the same government that Harry wants to
have total control over every aspect of our lives.


You are projecting again. I've never said or intimated that I wanted
"government...to have total control over every aspect of our lives."

It is pretty hard to find something, other than abortion and sexual
conduct that you don't want them to control and when you imply that
the preeminent agency for enforcing all of those laws is either
incompetent or corrupt, it calls the whole process into question.

On 7/7/16 4:00 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:44:53 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/7/16 2:42 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:

"The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly
every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in
almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal
defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.�

You forgot this part:
"Warnings about the problem have been mounting. In 2002, the FBI reported that its own DNA testing found that examiners reported false hair matches more than 11 percent of the time. In the District, the only jurisdiction where defenders and prosecutors have re-investigated all FBI hair convictions, three of seven defendants
whose
trials included flawed FBI testimony have been exonerated through DNA testing since 2009, and courts have exonerated two more men. All five served 20 to 30 years in prison for rape or murder.

I find it amusing that this is the same government that Harry wants to
have total control over every aspect of our lives.


You are projecting again. I've never said or intimated that I wanted
"government...to have total control over every aspect of our lives."

It is pretty hard to find something, other than abortion and sexual
conduct that you don't want them to control and when you imply that
the preeminent agency for enforcing all of those laws is either
incompetent or corrupt, it calls the whole process into question.



As I suspect, you have nothing on which to base your projection that I
want "government...to have total control over every aspect of our lives."

Thank you for playing.

On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:04:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/7/16 4:00 PM, wrote:

I find it amusing that this is the same government that Harry wants to
have total control over every aspect of our lives.


You are projecting again. I've never said or intimated that I wanted
"government...to have total control over every aspect of our lives."

It is pretty hard to find something, other than abortion and sexual
conduct that you don't want them to control and when you imply that
the preeminent agency for enforcing all of those laws is either
incompetent or corrupt, it calls the whole process into question.



As I suspect, you have nothing on which to base your projection that I
want "government...to have total control over every aspect of our lives."

Thank you for playing.

OK Rick Perry time.
Which government regulatory agencies would you eliminate?

On 7/7/16 4:20 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:04:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/7/16 4:00 PM, wrote:

I find it amusing that this is the same government that Harry wants to
have total control over every aspect of our lives.


You are projecting again. I've never said or intimated that I wanted
"government...to have total control over every aspect of our lives."

It is pretty hard to find something, other than abortion and sexual
conduct that you don't want them to control and when you imply that
the preeminent agency for enforcing all of those laws is either
incompetent or corrupt, it calls the whole process into question.



As I suspect, you have nothing on which to base your projection that I
want "government...to have total control over every aspect of our lives."

Thank you for playing.

OK Rick Perry time.
Which government regulatory agencies would you eliminate?


Never considered that.

On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:58:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Thank you for playing.

OK Rick Perry time.
Which government regulatory agencies would you eliminate?


Never considered that.

No ****, you never saw a government regulation that you didn't like.
Thank YOU for playing

Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/7/16 2:42 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:

"The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly
every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in
almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal
defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.?

You forgot this part:
"Warnings about the problem have been mounting. In 2002, the FBI reported that its own DNA testing found that examiners reported false hair matches more than 11 percent of the time. In the District, the only jurisdiction where defenders and prosecutors have re-investigated all FBI hair convictions, three of seven defendants whose
trials included flawed FBI testimony have been exonerated through DNA testing since 2009, and courts have exonerated two more men. All five served 20 to 30 years in prison for rape or murder.

I find it amusing that this is the same government that Harry wants to
have total control over every aspect of our lives.


You are projecting again. I've never said or intimated that I wanted
"government...to have total control over every aspect of our lives."

Name 5 things that you feel most strongly, shouldn't be
controlled by your government.

--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/