![]() |
Yo Calif Bill
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 19:49:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
How about the insurance company that has to pick up the tab? This does bring up an interesting point. Insurance companies are in the risk business and if this was so risky, we should expect that his homeowner's insurance would be out of sight. Tim, what do you pay per $100,000 in coverage? How bout you Harry? Richard? That would be an impartial indicator, made by underwriters who do this for a living and actually have skin in the game |
Yo Calif Bill
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 20:08:12 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/4/16 5:58 PM, wrote: On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:15:48 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/4/16 4:08 PM, wrote: On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:13:06 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: 1977. Almost 40 years ago. Things have changed a bit. From Harry's county web site "Property owners may construct their own dwelling on their own property without a license (with proper permits). " Since these are generally state law, I am sure I could do it in PG too. I do agree, the process is more complicated these days but that is what happens when the government gets to be out of control. The inspection process has not changed much and that is where safety comes in. Why is the government out of control? The electrician and plumber who did my genny got their permits without delays or difficulties, and the inspectors came out in short order. I simply what qualifies for a fast tracked (while you wait) on the Calvert County web site. They are really just for things that should not really need one anyway. (sheds, decks etc) At a certain point it is just a building tax. Improperly built decks collapse and kill or maim people, but, I suppose, if you are a loonytarian, anyone who steps onto a deck should know the risks. Old, legally built decks can collapse too, what's your point? Should they have a continuing program of inspections? I understand the nanny state would try to legislate away all risk but at a certain point it just becomes another form of tyranny or more often, just another tax. |
Yo Calif Bill
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 20:16:30 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/4/16 5:59 PM, wrote: Yeah you managed to put a gas block in an AR, all by yourself. First I had to unpin it, remove it and grind it into shape, and then reinstall it with the pins. Sounds exhausting I guess I could have sent it to you, but, then, I'd have no assurance it would work properly upon getting it back. If I had the rifle to fit it to it would work fine. I do have some ordinance training from Uncle Sam. You impress me as a "press on regardless" sort of home improvement guy. I get by I'd never hire you. I wouldn't work for you, or anyone else. It would be illegal. |
Yo Calif Bill
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 20:32:45 -0500, Alex wrote:
I'm supposed to get a permit to install/replace a ceiling fan. They just want to collect your money. How is a ceiling fan replacement going to be inspected? I guess they might flip the switch to see if it runs. They also want a permit for a faucet replacement. We have one AHJ here who wants a permit for any device replacement. (receptacle, switch etc) I can only think that building is so slow in his patch that they are really looking for work. Even the other inspectors at my meetings think he is off the reservation. |
Yo Calif Bill
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 17:35:35 -0800 (PST), Its Me
wrote: On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 5:58:27 PM UTC-5, wrote: On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:15:48 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/4/16 4:08 PM, wrote: On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:13:06 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: 1977. Almost 40 years ago. Things have changed a bit. From Harry's county web site "Property owners may construct their own dwelling on their own property without a license (with proper permits). " Since these are generally state law, I am sure I could do it in PG too. I do agree, the process is more complicated these days but that is what happens when the government gets to be out of control. The inspection process has not changed much and that is where safety comes in. Why is the government out of control? The electrician and plumber who did my genny got their permits without delays or difficulties, and the inspectors came out in short order. I simply what qualifies for a fast tracked (while you wait) on the Calvert County web site. They are really just for things that should not really need one anyway. (sheds, decks etc) At a certain point it is just a building tax. Permits here are tougher than they are in Maryland but it is mostly just corporate welfare, benefitting people with a large compliance department over the small guy. That is true of most government regulation tho. If you can send a bunch of lawyers and some carefully targeted campaign contributions, regulation really does not apply to you. And permits are just vehicles to let the tax man know that you are improving the property. So they can up your tax bill in the next cycle. Around here, taxes are not really dependent on permits. I have done a few things without a permit but it still showed up promptly on my taxes. They look at aerials every year and do an on site inspection about every 2 years. They don't really do the inspections sequentially by address so they may be there to look at your neighbor's house but they still may take a peek at yours. |
Yo Calif Bill
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 21:35:06 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: I find your thinking on this subject to be somewhat conflicting but also amusing. On one hand you dismiss the importance of having qualified and licensed people doing structural or electrical work on homes or whatever yet you brag about your 8 years of being a super sleuth "inspector" of other people's work. It was just a hobby for me and I was paid by the hour per inspection so there was no reason to rush. I was probably the easiest going inspector any of these guys have ever dealt with, since I really did not have any "red tags" and no real attitude about who I was. I got compliance by cajoling them into just doing their job. Most were state employees so they would get paid either way and there was not really much I could do to them. In a few cases I actually fixed the violations myself. The contractors were actually better and I did have a little weight over them because I could hold up their pay. The best pure mechanics were inmates in the prisons. They had all the time in the world and a desire to keep their job. I do think it is important to hire qualified people but I am just not sure the current licensing and inspection process guarantees that. Certainly not in Florida. The biggest complaint you hear at an inspector meeting is about the lack of workmanship among the trades and how little they can do about it. The codes just take a sideways swipe at workmanship and without a specific violation, there is not much you can do about sloppy. You can go to just about any inspector web site and look at egregious violation pictures of work done by so called "qualified" people. If for no other reason, the home owner should be trying to do a good job, because he has to live there. Things I build exceed the code as a general rule. |
Yo Calif Bill
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 21:39:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: I'll say one thing though ... I'll do a ceiling fan anyday but when it comes to plumbing ... no way. Plumbing and I don't get along. Never did, never will. Plumbing (old work) is just nasty but if you are willing to cut it all out and start over it is not really that tough.. Particularly with plastic pipe. Back in the olden days with cast iron and galvanized there was a level of skill involved. Copper actually made that fairly easy if you knew how to sweat pipe. PVC made it childs play. The tricky thing is when you get to vents and drains. I have taken a few classes in it and it really is not that complicated if you can step back and understand where the potential siphons are. We had one instructor who really made the whole thing easy to understand without getting into all of the code language, which is tortured to say the least. Once you understand the concepts involved, the code starts making sense. I am required to take a certain number of continuing education hours every 2 years but 8 hours of that can be an "elective" and I usually try for something that is not electrical since I already spend plenty of time online discussing code issues. I always end up with far more hours than I need anyway. There are plenty of opportunities for free classes and I take them when I can. In spite of what Harry thinks, I spend a lot of time in a learning environment, it is just not modern european art so I guess it doesn't count. |
Yo Calif Bill
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 21:50:35 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: rec.boats is certainly full of fascinating outlooks on many subjects. I have a pretty fair knowledge of electrical power distribution but I am far from being an electrician. When it comes to *major* electrical installations in my house I hire an electrician who is current on the codes. Many things that have changed since knob and tube wiring. :-) You guys are on the 14 code so there are lots of changes, just since the 11. Most of the stuff around the service really hasn't changed much since the Clinton administration and the biggest changes were no more 3 wire dryer/range plugs and 4 wire feeders to your out buildings. As Phil Simmonds said in the proposal, the war is over, we don't need to save the copper. The big ongoing changes are around GFCIs and AFCIs. In the 14 you have very few places that do not require an AFCI. There are also required tamper resistant receptacles damn near everywhere and weather resistant receptacles outside. That is probably the most important for the weekend warrior if you want to stay compliant. There are a number of publications every cycle about significant changes. This is a free one (the PP slides for a presentation I attended) http://www.necanet.org/docs/default-...f.pdf?sfvrsn=0 |
Yo Calif Bill
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 20:54:14 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: How about a fireman who while performing his job is killed by the failure of under-spec'd products or techniques? firemen take that risk daily. fires ignite by a faulty whatever, even when new buildings are up to code. It happens. Yes, Chicago may be one of the most dangerous place for firemen to work and they have the strictest electrical code in the nation along with union rules that assures you have a journeyman twisting every wire nut and pulling every wire (or at least standing there watching an apprentice do it) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com