![]() |
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/23/15 3:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:53:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. If you live in an Italian boarding house, was squirrel cachetore (so). Krause considers squirrel hunting a show of courage. Probably never ate squirrel in his life. I prefer rabbit, but squirrel's not bad, unless it's a 15 year-old tough assed boar. -- Good grief, the stupid runs deep in you, Herring. Did you make these for your grandkids, Mr. Brave White Hunter? http://tinyurl.com/oy7azwl Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. |
S&W M&P 15/22
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 2:53 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. If you live in an Italian boarding house, was squirrel cachetore (so). Our next door neighbors when I was growing up were Italian. Real Italian, born in Italy, though their three sons were born in New Haven. Gee, I don't recall that I knew their immigrant status. The dad was a lawyer, and the three sons did well in school, even if they might have been what the Nativists call "anchor babies." In any event, to my knowledge, Mrs. F, the mom, never served squirrel. I would have known because Mrs. F loved me...I would happily eat whatever she cooked, and I was always welcome in her kitchen. Two of her three sons hardly ate at all. Drove my mother crazy. My mom was a decent cook, but she couldn't compete with Mrs. F. :) This lady was 100% Italian. Her kids were born in Italy. The sons hunted squirrels. Sunday's she would invite some of us to dinner. Never a bad meal! |
S&W M&P 15/22
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 3:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:53:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. If you live in an Italian boarding house, was squirrel cachetore (so). Krause considers squirrel hunting a show of courage. Probably never ate squirrel in his life. I prefer rabbit, but squirrel's not bad, unless it's a 15 year-old tough assed boar. -- Good grief, the stupid runs deep in you, Herring. Did you make these for your grandkids, Mr. Brave White Hunter? http://tinyurl.com/oy7azwl Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. Guinea pig is tough and greasy. At least the one I was served in Peru. They are raised there for food. The Last Supper paining in the city of Cusco main church has a roasted guinea Pig on the platter. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/23/15 7:50 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 3:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:53:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. If you live in an Italian boarding house, was squirrel cachetore (so). Krause considers squirrel hunting a show of courage. Probably never ate squirrel in his life. I prefer rabbit, but squirrel's not bad, unless it's a 15 year-old tough assed boar. -- Good grief, the stupid runs deep in you, Herring. Did you make these for your grandkids, Mr. Brave White Hunter? http://tinyurl.com/oy7azwl Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. Guinea pig is tough and greasy. At least the one I was served in Peru. They are raised there for food. The Last Supper paining in the city of Cusco main church has a roasted guinea Pig on the platter. Now that is interesting, since guinea pig ain't kosher, and the last supper was a passover meal. Heresy! :) |
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/23/15 7:50 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 3:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:53:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. If you live in an Italian boarding house, was squirrel cachetore (so). Krause considers squirrel hunting a show of courage. Probably never ate squirrel in his life. I prefer rabbit, but squirrel's not bad, unless it's a 15 year-old tough assed boar. -- Good grief, the stupid runs deep in you, Herring. Did you make these for your grandkids, Mr. Brave White Hunter? http://tinyurl.com/oy7azwl Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. Guinea pig is tough and greasy. At least the one I was served in Peru. They are raised there for food. The Last Supper paining in the city of Cusco main church has a roasted guinea Pig on the platter. I'll be glad to take your word on that. :) |
S&W M&P 15/22
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 7:50 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 3:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:53:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. If you live in an Italian boarding house, was squirrel cachetore (so). Krause considers squirrel hunting a show of courage. Probably never ate squirrel in his life. I prefer rabbit, but squirrel's not bad, unless it's a 15 year-old tough assed boar. -- Good grief, the stupid runs deep in you, Herring. Did you make these for your grandkids, Mr. Brave White Hunter? http://tinyurl.com/oy7azwl Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. Guinea pig is tough and greasy. At least the one I was served in Peru. They are raised there for food. The Last Supper paining in the city of Cusco main church has a roasted guinea Pig on the platter. I'll be glad to take your word on that. :) Why would guinea pig be not kosher? Not really swine. Pics http://www.delange.org/CathedralCusc...edralCusco.htm |
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/23/15 8:48 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 7:50 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 3:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:53:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. If you live in an Italian boarding house, was squirrel cachetore (so). Krause considers squirrel hunting a show of courage. Probably never ate squirrel in his life. I prefer rabbit, but squirrel's not bad, unless it's a 15 year-old tough assed boar. -- Good grief, the stupid runs deep in you, Herring. Did you make these for your grandkids, Mr. Brave White Hunter? http://tinyurl.com/oy7azwl Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. Guinea pig is tough and greasy. At least the one I was served in Peru. They are raised there for food. The Last Supper paining in the city of Cusco main church has a roasted guinea Pig on the platter. I'll be glad to take your word on that. :) Why would guinea pig be not kosher? Not really swine. Pics http://www.delange.org/CathedralCusc...edralCusco.htm Because it doesn't chew its cud and it doesn't have split hooves. Both are requirements for "meat" to be kosher. Leviticus 11:3-8: Whatever parts the hoof and is cloven-footed and chews the cud, among the animals, you may eat. Thus, the guinea pig is not kosher. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:49:29 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 8/23/15 12:44 PM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:01:35 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 10:53 AM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:00:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. We don't hear about much bravery from you. Why is that how you frame every argument? How brave is it to go buy a chicken from Giant? Hey, last year I stopped a guy who was verbally abusing and manhandling a woman, and suffered a broken wrist for my trouble, an injury that at best is only 90% "healed." I guess it is brave to pick a fight with someone who kicked your ass. I wasn't the one who ran away...and he didn't kick my ass. I hit him too hard. Yet you are the one who is still 10% disabled ... he won, even if it happened the way you say. I think you just fell. Sorry, shooting squirrels or just about any critter just isn't something that I see as brave or sporting. But, of course, opinions vary. Why is bravery an issue here at all, it is just harvesting food. No, for some it is "sport." What do you call the shooting you do? |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:07:00 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. Aren't you the guy who was telling us about shooting stray dogs in the woods? |
S&W M&P 15/22
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 8:48 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 7:50 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 3:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:53:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. If you live in an Italian boarding house, was squirrel cachetore (so). Krause considers squirrel hunting a show of courage. Probably never ate squirrel in his life. I prefer rabbit, but squirrel's not bad, unless it's a 15 year-old tough assed boar. -- Good grief, the stupid runs deep in you, Herring. Did you make these for your grandkids, Mr. Brave White Hunter? http://tinyurl.com/oy7azwl Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. Guinea pig is tough and greasy. At least the one I was served in Peru. They are raised there for food. The Last Supper paining in the city of Cusco main church has a roasted guinea Pig on the platter. I'll be glad to take your word on that. :) Why would guinea pig be not kosher? Not really swine. Pics http://www.delange.org/CathedralCusc...edralCusco.htm Because it doesn't chew its cud and it doesn't have split hooves. Both are requirements for "meat" to be kosher. Leviticus 11:3-8: Whatever parts the hoof and is cloven-footed and chews the cud, among the animals, you may eat. Thus, the guinea pig is not kosher. What about chicken? No hoof either, and no cud. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 9:58:47 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. I've used short 22s in the woods for a long time. Got lots of squirrels raccoon and gobs of rabbits too. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Sunday, August 23, 2015 at 7:00:45 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it.. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. Don't know about the cap part, but bagging squirrel is better for you than buying those pre-assassinated steaks, chops, and breasts for $9.95 a lb. Lean meat with no antibiotics and no growth hormones. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/23/15 10:37 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:49:29 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:44 PM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:01:35 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 10:53 AM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:00:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. We don't hear about much bravery from you. Why is that how you frame every argument? How brave is it to go buy a chicken from Giant? Hey, last year I stopped a guy who was verbally abusing and manhandling a woman, and suffered a broken wrist for my trouble, an injury that at best is only 90% "healed." I guess it is brave to pick a fight with someone who kicked your ass. I wasn't the one who ran away...and he didn't kick my ass. I hit him too hard. Yet you are the one who is still 10% disabled ... he won, even if it happened the way you say. I think you just fell. Sorry, shooting squirrels or just about any critter just isn't something that I see as brave or sporting. But, of course, opinions vary. Why is bravery an issue here at all, it is just harvesting food. No, for some it is "sport." What do you call the shooting you do? Shooting. Target practice. Oh, and your concept of "winning" is absurd. |
S&W M&P 15/22
|
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/23/15 11:29 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 8:48 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 7:50 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 3:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:53:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. If you live in an Italian boarding house, was squirrel cachetore (so). Krause considers squirrel hunting a show of courage. Probably never ate squirrel in his life. I prefer rabbit, but squirrel's not bad, unless it's a 15 year-old tough assed boar. -- Good grief, the stupid runs deep in you, Herring. Did you make these for your grandkids, Mr. Brave White Hunter? http://tinyurl.com/oy7azwl Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. Guinea pig is tough and greasy. At least the one I was served in Peru. They are raised there for food. The Last Supper paining in the city of Cusco main church has a roasted guinea Pig on the platter. I'll be glad to take your word on that. :) Why would guinea pig be not kosher? Not really swine. Pics http://www.delange.org/CathedralCusc...edralCusco.htm Because it doesn't chew its cud and it doesn't have split hooves. Both are requirements for "meat" to be kosher. Leviticus 11:3-8: Whatever parts the hoof and is cloven-footed and chews the cud, among the animals, you may eat. Thus, the guinea pig is not kosher. What about chicken? No hoof either, and no cud. Chicken is not "meat." |
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/24/15 1:24 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, August 23, 2015 at 7:00:45 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. Don't know about the cap part, but bagging squirrel is better for you than buying those pre-assassinated steaks, chops, and breasts for $9.95 a lb. Lean meat with no antibiotics and no growth hormones. What about groundhogs and rats, dressed up, say, with a side order of palmetto bugs for crunch? :) |
S&W M&P 15/22
|
S&W M&P 15/22
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 3:34:23 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/24/15 1:24 AM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, August 23, 2015 at 7:00:45 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. Don't know about the cap part, but bagging squirrel is better for you than buying those pre-assassinated steaks, chops, and breasts for $9.95 a lb.. Lean meat with no antibiotics and no growth hormones. What about groundhogs and rats, dressed up, say, with a side order of palmetto bugs for crunch? :) Groundhogs are good bbq don't know about the rats and palmetto bugs. never had them. are they good? |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:15:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 9:58:47 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. I've used short 22s in the woods for a long time. Got lots of squirrels raccoon and gobs of rabbits too. All I used as a kid was shorts. Couldn't afford anything else. I see you were very courageous (in Harry's terms) also. I'll bet you ate all the critters you shot, too. Well,l maybe not the raccoons. We sold the 'coon skins for a buck-fifty, which was enough to buy three more boxes of .22 shorts. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:06:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 3:34:23 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/24/15 1:24 AM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, August 23, 2015 at 7:00:45 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote: Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a better option to the SKS. Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? :) The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering. Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my cheap ammo of choice. 100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me, and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver really accurately at 50 yards or more... :) The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can. If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat. The world is awash with it. Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic 300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that. I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it. The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly out of a hand gun. Have you tried these http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain down range performance. Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. Don't know about the cap part, but bagging squirrel is better for you than buying those pre-assassinated steaks, chops, and breasts for $9.95 a lb. Lean meat with no antibiotics and no growth hormones. What about groundhogs and rats, dressed up, say, with a side order of palmetto bugs for crunch? :) Groundhogs are good bbq don't know about the rats and palmetto bugs. never had them. are they good? My dad roasted a groundhog that I'd shot when I was a kid. Roasted it for several hours. We all sat down to eat, he cut a chunk off for everyone, and we proceeded to start chewing. About a half-hour (slight exageration) later, we all spit our chunks out. Too tough to chew. You must have had a young female, and we probably had a 20 year-old boar. Never tried groundhog again. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
S&W M&P 15/22
Sorry for the dinner table misfortune John. Then again. Later came the crockpots. Raccoon, squirrel and groundhog do really well bbq,d in a crockpot.
|
S&W M&P 15/22
Here's some ways to prepare and cook groundhog
http://briansbelly.com/belly-recipes/groundhog-roundup/ |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:38:09 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
Sorry for the dinner table misfortune John. Then again. Later came the crockpots. Raccoon, squirrel and groundhog do really well bbq,d in a crockpot. I'll bet they would. Put enough Stubb's spicy sauce on it, and anything'd be decent from a crockpot. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:25:08 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 8/23/15 10:37 PM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:49:29 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:44 PM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:01:35 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 10:53 AM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:00:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. We don't hear about much bravery from you. Why is that how you frame every argument? How brave is it to go buy a chicken from Giant? Hey, last year I stopped a guy who was verbally abusing and manhandling a woman, and suffered a broken wrist for my trouble, an injury that at best is only 90% "healed." I guess it is brave to pick a fight with someone who kicked your ass. I wasn't the one who ran away...and he didn't kick my ass. I hit him too hard. Yet you are the one who is still 10% disabled ... he won, even if it happened the way you say. I think you just fell. Sorry, shooting squirrels or just about any critter just isn't something that I see as brave or sporting. But, of course, opinions vary. Why is bravery an issue here at all, it is just harvesting food. No, for some it is "sport." What do you call the shooting you do? Shooting. Target practice. Oh, and your concept of "winning" is absurd. Is it a sport? Do you feel brave when you do it? |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:26:42 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 8/23/15 10:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:07:00 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. Aren't you the guy who was telling us about shooting stray dogs in the woods? No, I stated that feral dogs that were attacking in packs were a concern out on some of the trails near the Shenandoah. I never said I was shooting them. I do carry on the trails, though. Uh Huh. They must have missed all of those stories of the people being killed in stray dog attacks in my paper. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:31:37 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Chicken is not "meat." I will have to tell my vegan friends that. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/24/15 9:48 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:38:09 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Sorry for the dinner table misfortune John. Then again. Later came the crockpots. Raccoon, squirrel and groundhog do really well bbq,d in a crockpot. I'll bet they would. Put enough Stubb's spicy sauce on it, and anything'd be decent from a crockpot. -- So long as you want everything to taste like spicy barbecue sauce. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:34:21 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 8/24/15 1:24 AM, Tim wrote: Don't know about the cap part, but bagging squirrel is better for you than buying those pre-assassinated steaks, chops, and breasts for $9.95 a lb. Lean meat with no antibiotics and no growth hormones. What about groundhogs and rats, dressed up, say, with a side order of palmetto bugs for crunch? :) Not my cup of tea but it might be healthier for you than an antibiotic laced chicken. Bugs constitute a large part of the protein intake in most of the 3d world. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/24/15 10:36 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:25:08 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 10:37 PM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:49:29 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:44 PM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:01:35 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 10:53 AM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:00:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Why not use .22 shorts? I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what you do. Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue. We don't hear about much bravery from you. Why is that how you frame every argument? How brave is it to go buy a chicken from Giant? Hey, last year I stopped a guy who was verbally abusing and manhandling a woman, and suffered a broken wrist for my trouble, an injury that at best is only 90% "healed." I guess it is brave to pick a fight with someone who kicked your ass. I wasn't the one who ran away...and he didn't kick my ass. I hit him too hard. Yet you are the one who is still 10% disabled ... he won, even if it happened the way you say. I think you just fell. Sorry, shooting squirrels or just about any critter just isn't something that I see as brave or sporting. But, of course, opinions vary. Why is bravery an issue here at all, it is just harvesting food. No, for some it is "sport." What do you call the shooting you do? Shooting. Target practice. Oh, and your concept of "winning" is absurd. Is it a sport? Do you feel brave when you do it? Why would I feel like a "brave, great white hunter" shooting targets and sodapop bottles? Oh, competitive target/range shooting is a sport. Killing a dumb animal is not. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:43:56 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: On 8/23/2015 10:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:07:00 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits. Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave hunter and sportsman/woman. Aren't you the guy who was telling us about shooting stray dogs in the woods? Harry/s afraid of dogs. He prefers the company of Kitties. I will shoot a feral cat. It is not because i am afraid of them, only that they cause a lot of damage to the environment. Far more than a stray dog. |
S&W M&P 15/22
|
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:06:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 3:34:23 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: What about groundhogs and rats, dressed up, say, with a side order of palmetto bugs for crunch? :) Groundhogs are good bbq don't know about the rats and palmetto bugs. never had them. are they good? I am not sure the American Cockroach is kosher, Leviticus is silent on the issue but you can eat grasshoppers and still keep kosher. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:16:32 -0400, John H.
wrote: All I used as a kid was shorts. Couldn't afford anything else. I see you were very courageous (in Harry's terms) also. I'll bet you ate all the critters you shot, too. Well,l maybe not the raccoons. We sold the 'coon skins for a buck-fifty, which was enough to buy three more boxes of .22 shorts. I ate a raccoon leg at a fish fry once. It wasn't bad. The guy put it in a smoker overnight and served it with an apple in it's mouth. It tasted like just about everything you smoke |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:44:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 8/24/15 10:36 AM, wrote: Shooting. Target practice. Oh, and your concept of "winning" is absurd. Is it a sport? Do you feel brave when you do it? Why would I feel like a "brave, great white hunter" shooting targets and sodapop bottles? Oh, competitive target/range shooting is a sport. Killing a dumb animal is not. So why do you need to bring up "brave" in the first place? How brave are you walking around in the woods packing heat in case you might run into a petulant pomeranian? We have hiked all over the west where you see rattlesnakes, wolves and bears. I never felt the need to pack and I was never really scared. There are black bears and cougars (AKA Florida Panthers) within walking distance of my house. I am not scared at all when I mow the lawn |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:16:57 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:44:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/24/15 10:36 AM, wrote: Shooting. Target practice. Oh, and your concept of "winning" is absurd. Is it a sport? Do you feel brave when you do it? Why would I feel like a "brave, great white hunter" shooting targets and sodapop bottles? Oh, competitive target/range shooting is a sport. Killing a dumb animal is not. So why do you need to bring up "brave" in the first place? How brave are you walking around in the woods packing heat in case you might run into a petulant pomeranian? We have hiked all over the west where you see rattlesnakes, wolves and bears. I never felt the need to pack and I was never really scared. There are black bears and cougars (AKA Florida Panthers) within walking distance of my house. I am not scared at all when I mow the lawn You're not Harry Krause, else you would be scared. Simple. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:53:11 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 8/24/15 10:39 AM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:31:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Chicken is not "meat." I will have to tell my vegan friends that. I'm sure any conservative or orthodox rabbi in your neighborhood could explain Kashrut to you. My understanding of it is many decades old, and attained through proximity. They will tell you chicken turkey and duck are kosher species of meat. They will not say chicken is not meat. Of course you would only say the ducks and turkeys were "kosher" if someone else killed them for you and that they came from a factory farm. Food taken from the wild is not brave enough for you. Courage comes in a foam tray. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/24/15 11:16 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:44:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/24/15 10:36 AM, wrote: Shooting. Target practice. Oh, and your concept of "winning" is absurd. Is it a sport? Do you feel brave when you do it? Why would I feel like a "brave, great white hunter" shooting targets and sodapop bottles? Oh, competitive target/range shooting is a sport. Killing a dumb animal is not. So why do you need to bring up "brave" in the first place? How brave are you walking around in the woods packing heat in case you might run into a petulant pomeranian? We have hiked all over the west where you see rattlesnakes, wolves and bears. I never felt the need to pack and I was never really scared. There are black bears and cougars (AKA Florida Panthers) within walking distance of my house. I am not scared at all when I mow the lawn Why do you think your experience or lack of it with bears and cougars is relevant to the packs of feral dogs that were and maybe still are active around some of the trails above the Shenandoah River? My use of the term "brave white hunter" is sarcastic and literary, by the way. In case you don't get it. Which, apparently, you don't. |
S&W M&P 15/22
On 8/24/15 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:53:11 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/24/15 10:39 AM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:31:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Chicken is not "meat." I will have to tell my vegan friends that. I'm sure any conservative or orthodox rabbi in your neighborhood could explain Kashrut to you. My understanding of it is many decades old, and attained through proximity. They will tell you chicken turkey and duck are kosher species of meat. They will not say chicken is not meat. Of course you would only say the ducks and turkeys were "kosher" if someone else killed them for you and that they came from a factory farm. Food taken from the wild is not brave enough for you. Courage comes in a foam tray. *I* wouldn't be making judgments on the killing of poultry, since "kosher" is something of only peripheral and formerly proximity interest to me, but, yes, I am aware of the fact that Jews who "keep kosher" would want their poultry slaughtered according to the rules of Kashrut. And, once again, I don't eat rodents. There was and perhaps still is an allegedly decent restaurant in Kansas City where deer, moose, bison, and a bunch of others are served up. Never went there...wasn't much of a beef eater then and am not much of one now. I did taste deer once, and thought it tasted like...beef, sort of. Not a big barbecue fan, either, at least not for barbecue drowning in spicy sauce. What's the point, when all you can really taste is the sauce? |
S&W M&P 15/22
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:29:42 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 8/24/15 11:16 AM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:44:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/24/15 10:36 AM, wrote: Shooting. Target practice. Oh, and your concept of "winning" is absurd. Is it a sport? Do you feel brave when you do it? Why would I feel like a "brave, great white hunter" shooting targets and sodapop bottles? Oh, competitive target/range shooting is a sport. Killing a dumb animal is not. So why do you need to bring up "brave" in the first place? How brave are you walking around in the woods packing heat in case you might run into a petulant pomeranian? We have hiked all over the west where you see rattlesnakes, wolves and bears. I never felt the need to pack and I was never really scared. There are black bears and cougars (AKA Florida Panthers) within walking distance of my house. I am not scared at all when I mow the lawn Why do you think your experience or lack of it with bears and cougars is relevant to the packs of feral dogs that were and maybe still are active around some of the trails above the Shenandoah River? Sounds like an irrational fear to me mr braveheart. My use of the term "brave white hunter" is sarcastic and literary, by the way. In case you don't get it. Which, apparently, you don't. No I do not understand why you need to **** on everyone who doesn't think exactly like you about things. It is not like you are standing on the moral high ground of a vegan or even someone with credible environmental credentials. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com