| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For the Gregg-ster...
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the Gregg-ster...
On 1/23/15 1:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:25:13 -0500, wrote: That does sound reasonable. I think if I was going to get a can for my Ruger I would just buy another (threaded) barrel. You can get one for about the same money the last time I looked. === It turns out that you don't really need to thread the barrel on most if not all Ruger 3s. Mine has little detents on each side which are designed to accept set screws for slip-on accessories such as muzzle breaks. No reason why a suppressor couldn't slip on the same way. Gee, I've never noticed such detents on any of the Ruger Mark III's I've owned or handled, nor are such detents visible on the Mark III's shown on the Ruger websites. I have seen a Rube Goldberg-like device that clamps over the front sight and allows attachment of muzzle accessories. Oh, my current production Mark III, Model 512, has no little detents. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the Gregg-ster...
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:51:26 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 1/23/15 1:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:25:13 -0500, wrote: That does sound reasonable. I think if I was going to get a can for my Ruger I would just buy another (threaded) barrel. You can get one for about the same money the last time I looked. === It turns out that you don't really need to thread the barrel on most if not all Ruger 3s. Mine has little detents on each side which are designed to accept set screws for slip-on accessories such as muzzle breaks. No reason why a suppressor couldn't slip on the same way. Gee, I've never noticed such detents on any of the Ruger Mark III's I've owned or handled, nor are such detents visible on the Mark III's shown on the Ruger websites. I have seen a Rube Goldberg-like device that clamps over the front sight and allows attachment of muzzle accessories. Oh, my current production Mark III, Model 512, has no little detents. === Your Mileage May Vary. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the Gregg-ster...
On 1/23/15 4:34 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:51:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/23/15 1:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:25:13 -0500, wrote: That does sound reasonable. I think if I was going to get a can for my Ruger I would just buy another (threaded) barrel. You can get one for about the same money the last time I looked. === It turns out that you don't really need to thread the barrel on most if not all Ruger 3s. Mine has little detents on each side which are designed to accept set screws for slip-on accessories such as muzzle breaks. No reason why a suppressor couldn't slip on the same way. Gee, I've never noticed such detents on any of the Ruger Mark III's I've owned or handled, nor are such detents visible on the Mark III's shown on the Ruger websites. I have seen a Rube Goldberg-like device that clamps over the front sight and allows attachment of muzzle accessories. Oh, my current production Mark III, Model 512, has no little detents. === Your Mileage May Vary. Right down to zero miles... -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Decent firearm for The Greg-ster | General | |||
| Decent firearm for The Greg-ster | Cruising | |||
| It may have been coming after you, Gregg... | General | |||
| Yo Gregg! | General | |||
| I blame it on Gregg. | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
