The contemporaries of Jesus who met him, spoke with him, and wrote or
discussed it with other were not delusional. There is plenty of
scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Jesus.
You have no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of Nietzsche, and you have no scientific evidence to support
the Nietzsche's idea of reality or his ideas of God.
Is Nietzsche's 'Will to Power' your driving force?
It is possible there was a Jewish prophet who is called Jesus (not his
real name). My comment was about the existence of a supreme being. There
is no evidence Jesus was a supreme being or the son of a supreme being.
He wasn't even considered "divine" until a dying pagan Roman emperor
said he was.
Your comments about the existence of Nietzsche are just silly.
Similar Threads
In response to...
Threaded Mode
