On 1/3/15 8:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:08:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God



Ahh, but *actually existed* and his thoughts and writings are
still significant, and there is no question that his thoughts and
writings were *his* .

How do *you* know? Did you meet him or did you just read about him?

Prove, scientifically, that he existed.


That's just silly.

Why? There are more people who have claimed they have talked to god
than claim they have talked to, or even seen Nietzsche.

Pretty soon this could evolve into whether there was ever a
Shakespeare or if Francis Bacon wrote it all.



Ah, yes, but the contemporaries of Nietzsche who met him, spoke with
him, and wrote or discussed it with other were not delusional. There is
plenty of scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Nietzsche. There is no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of a supreme being, and there is no more evidence to support
modern man's idea of the reality of god then there was for the ancient
Egyptians, Greeks, or Romans. If you believe in god, it is a belief
based on faith alone.

On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:20:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/3/15 8:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:08:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God



Ahh, but *actually existed* and his thoughts and writings are
still significant, and there is no question that his thoughts and
writings were *his* .

How do *you* know? Did you meet him or did you just read about him?

Prove, scientifically, that he existed.


That's just silly.

Why? There are more people who have claimed they have talked to god
than claim they have talked to, or even seen Nietzsche.

Pretty soon this could evolve into whether there was ever a
Shakespeare or if Francis Bacon wrote it all.



Ah, yes, but the contemporaries of Nietzsche who met him, spoke with
him, and wrote or discussed it with other were not delusional. There is
plenty of scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Nietzsche. There is no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of a supreme being, and there is no more evidence to support
modern man's idea of the reality of god then there was for the ancient
Egyptians, Greeks, or Romans. If you believe in god, it is a belief
based on faith alone.

===

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God

God is dead.

- Harry Krause

etc., etc.

On 1/3/2015 10:52 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:20:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/3/15 8:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:08:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God



Ahh, but *actually existed* and his thoughts and writings are
still significant, and there is no question that his thoughts and
writings were *his* .

How do *you* know? Did you meet him or did you just read about him?

Prove, scientifically, that he existed.


That's just silly.

Why? There are more people who have claimed they have talked to god
than claim they have talked to, or even seen Nietzsche.

Pretty soon this could evolve into whether there was ever a
Shakespeare or if Francis Bacon wrote it all.



Ah, yes, but the contemporaries of Nietzsche who met him, spoke with
him, and wrote or discussed it with other were not delusional. There is
plenty of scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Nietzsche. There is no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of a supreme being, and there is no more evidence to support
modern man's idea of the reality of god then there was for the ancient
Egyptians, Greeks, or Romans. If you believe in god, it is a belief
based on faith alone.

===

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God

God is dead.

- Harry Krause

etc., etc.


Harry will be rolling over in his grave trying to solve the mysteries of
the universe. That's his curse. ;-

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan

On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:20:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/3/15 8:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:08:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God



Ahh, but *actually existed* and his thoughts and writings are
still significant, and there is no question that his thoughts and
writings were *his* .

How do *you* know? Did you meet him or did you just read about him?

Prove, scientifically, that he existed.


That's just silly.

Why? There are more people who have claimed they have talked to god
than claim they have talked to, or even seen Nietzsche.

Pretty soon this could evolve into whether there was ever a
Shakespeare or if Francis Bacon wrote it all.



Ah, yes, but the contemporaries of Nietzsche who met him, spoke with
him, and wrote or discussed it with other were not delusional. There is
plenty of scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Nietzsche. There is no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of a supreme being, and there is no more evidence to support
modern man's idea of the reality of god then there was for the ancient
Egyptians, Greeks, or Romans. If you believe in god, it is a belief
based on faith alone.

The contemporaries of Jesus who met him, spoke with him, and wrote or
discussed it with other were not delusional. There is plenty of
scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Jesus.

You have no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of Nietzsche, and you have no scientific evidence to support
the Nietzsche's idea of reality or his ideas of God.

Is Nietzsche's 'Will to Power' your driving force?

On 1/4/15 11:55 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:20:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/3/15 8:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:08:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God



Ahh, but *actually existed* and his thoughts and writings are
still significant, and there is no question that his thoughts and
writings were *his* .

How do *you* know? Did you meet him or did you just read about him?

Prove, scientifically, that he existed.


That's just silly.

Why? There are more people who have claimed they have talked to god
than claim they have talked to, or even seen Nietzsche.

Pretty soon this could evolve into whether there was ever a
Shakespeare or if Francis Bacon wrote it all.



Ah, yes, but the contemporaries of Nietzsche who met him, spoke with
him, and wrote or discussed it with other were not delusional. There is
plenty of scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Nietzsche. There is no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of a supreme being, and there is no more evidence to support
modern man's idea of the reality of god then there was for the ancient
Egyptians, Greeks, or Romans. If you believe in god, it is a belief
based on faith alone.

The contemporaries of Jesus who met him, spoke with him, and wrote or
discussed it with other were not delusional. There is plenty of
scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Jesus.

You have no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of Nietzsche, and you have no scientific evidence to support
the Nietzsche's idea of reality or his ideas of God.

Is Nietzsche's 'Will to Power' your driving force?



It is possible there was a Jewish prophet who is called Jesus (not his
real name). My comment was about the existence of a supreme being. There
is no evidence Jesus was a supreme being or the son of a supreme being.
He wasn't even considered "divine" until a dying pagan Roman emperor
said he was.


Your comments about the existence of Nietzsche are just silly.

On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:01:35 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/4/15 11:55 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:20:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/3/15 8:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:08:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God



Ahh, but *actually existed* and his thoughts and writings are
still significant, and there is no question that his thoughts and
writings were *his* .

How do *you* know? Did you meet him or did you just read about him?

Prove, scientifically, that he existed.


That's just silly.

Why? There are more people who have claimed they have talked to god
than claim they have talked to, or even seen Nietzsche.

Pretty soon this could evolve into whether there was ever a
Shakespeare or if Francis Bacon wrote it all.



Ah, yes, but the contemporaries of Nietzsche who met him, spoke with
him, and wrote or discussed it with other were not delusional. There is
plenty of scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Nietzsche. There is no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of a supreme being, and there is no more evidence to support
modern man's idea of the reality of god then there was for the ancient
Egyptians, Greeks, or Romans. If you believe in god, it is a belief
based on faith alone.

The contemporaries of Jesus who met him, spoke with him, and wrote or
discussed it with other were not delusional. There is plenty of
scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Jesus.

You have no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of Nietzsche, and you have no scientific evidence to support
the Nietzsche's idea of reality or his ideas of God.

Is Nietzsche's 'Will to Power' your driving force?



It is possible there was a Jewish prophet who is called Jesus (not his
real name). My comment was about the existence of a supreme being. There
is no evidence Jesus was a supreme being or the son of a supreme being.
He wasn't even considered "divine" until a dying pagan Roman emperor
said he was.


Your comments about the existence of Nietzsche are just silly.

But you hold your beliefs in the word of Nietzsche to hold more water
than the word of Jesus.

And you think you're the enlightened one.

On 1/4/15 12:10 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:01:35 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/4/15 11:55 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:20:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/3/15 8:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:08:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God



Ahh, but *actually existed* and his thoughts and writings are
still significant, and there is no question that his thoughts and
writings were *his* .

How do *you* know? Did you meet him or did you just read about him?

Prove, scientifically, that he existed.


That's just silly.

Why? There are more people who have claimed they have talked to god
than claim they have talked to, or even seen Nietzsche.

Pretty soon this could evolve into whether there was ever a
Shakespeare or if Francis Bacon wrote it all.



Ah, yes, but the contemporaries of Nietzsche who met him, spoke with
him, and wrote or discussed it with other were not delusional. There is
plenty of scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Nietzsche. There is no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of a supreme being, and there is no more evidence to support
modern man's idea of the reality of god then there was for the ancient
Egyptians, Greeks, or Romans. If you believe in god, it is a belief
based on faith alone.

The contemporaries of Jesus who met him, spoke with him, and wrote or
discussed it with other were not delusional. There is plenty of
scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Jesus.

You have no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of Nietzsche, and you have no scientific evidence to support
the Nietzsche's idea of reality or his ideas of God.

Is Nietzsche's 'Will to Power' your driving force?



It is possible there was a Jewish prophet who is called Jesus (not his
real name). My comment was about the existence of a supreme being. There
is no evidence Jesus was a supreme being or the son of a supreme being.
He wasn't even considered "divine" until a dying pagan Roman emperor
said he was.


Your comments about the existence of Nietzsche are just silly.

But you hold your beliefs in the word of Nietzsche to hold more water
than the word of Jesus.

And you think you're the enlightened one.


Nietzche's words were his own.

The words attributed to Jesus were written down by others and edited and
amended to suit those attending the First Council of Nicaea, during
which mortal men *decided* Jesus was divine. A college roommate who
became a priest taught me this.

On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:27:58 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

A college roommate who
became a priest taught me this.

===

You should have followed his example.

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:28:02 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 12:10 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:01:35 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/4/15 11:55 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:20:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/3/15 8:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:08:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God



Ahh, but *actually existed* and his thoughts and writings are
still significant, and there is no question that his thoughts and
writings were *his* .

How do *you* know? Did you meet him or did you just read about him?

Prove, scientifically, that he existed.


That's just silly.

Why? There are more people who have claimed they have talked to god
than claim they have talked to, or even seen Nietzsche.

Pretty soon this could evolve into whether there was ever a
Shakespeare or if Francis Bacon wrote it all.



Ah, yes, but the contemporaries of Nietzsche who met him, spoke with
him, and wrote or discussed it with other were not delusional. There is
plenty of scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Nietzsche. There is no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of a supreme being, and there is no more evidence to support
modern man's idea of the reality of god then there was for the ancient
Egyptians, Greeks, or Romans. If you believe in god, it is a belief
based on faith alone.

The contemporaries of Jesus who met him, spoke with him, and wrote or
discussed it with other were not delusional. There is plenty of
scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Jesus.

You have no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of Nietzsche, and you have no scientific evidence to support
the Nietzsche's idea of reality or his ideas of God.

Is Nietzsche's 'Will to Power' your driving force?



It is possible there was a Jewish prophet who is called Jesus (not his
real name). My comment was about the existence of a supreme being. There
is no evidence Jesus was a supreme being or the son of a supreme being..
He wasn't even considered "divine" until a dying pagan Roman emperor
said he was.


Your comments about the existence of Nietzsche are just silly.

But you hold your beliefs in the word of Nietzsche to hold more water
than the word of Jesus.

And you think you're the enlightened one.


Nietzche's words were his own.

The words attributed to Jesus were written down by others and edited and
amended to suit those attending the First Council of Nicaea, during
which mortal men *decided* Jesus was divine. A college roommate who
became a priest taught me this.

Is there scientific evidence of this, or just the words of a 20 year old room-mate?

On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:27:58 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/4/15 12:10 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:01:35 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/4/15 11:55 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:20:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/3/15 8:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:08:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

God is dead.

- Nietzsche

Nietzsche is dead.

- God



Ahh, but *actually existed* and his thoughts and writings are
still significant, and there is no question that his thoughts and
writings were *his* .

How do *you* know? Did you meet him or did you just read about him?

Prove, scientifically, that he existed.


That's just silly.

Why? There are more people who have claimed they have talked to god
than claim they have talked to, or even seen Nietzsche.

Pretty soon this could evolve into whether there was ever a
Shakespeare or if Francis Bacon wrote it all.



Ah, yes, but the contemporaries of Nietzsche who met him, spoke with
him, and wrote or discussed it with other were not delusional. There is
plenty of scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Nietzsche. There is no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of a supreme being, and there is no more evidence to support
modern man's idea of the reality of god then there was for the ancient
Egyptians, Greeks, or Romans. If you believe in god, it is a belief
based on faith alone.

The contemporaries of Jesus who met him, spoke with him, and wrote or
discussed it with other were not delusional. There is plenty of
scientifically acceptable evidence to support the existence of
Jesus.

You have no scientifically acceptable evidence to support the
existence of Nietzsche, and you have no scientific evidence to support
the Nietzsche's idea of reality or his ideas of God.

Is Nietzsche's 'Will to Power' your driving force?



It is possible there was a Jewish prophet who is called Jesus (not his
real name). My comment was about the existence of a supreme being. There
is no evidence Jesus was a supreme being or the son of a supreme being.
He wasn't even considered "divine" until a dying pagan Roman emperor
said he was.


Your comments about the existence of Nietzsche are just silly.

But you hold your beliefs in the word of Nietzsche to hold more water
than the word of Jesus.

And you think you're the enlightened one.


Nietzche's words were his own.

The words attributed to Jesus were written down by others and edited and
amended to suit those attending the First Council of Nicaea, during
which mortal men *decided* Jesus was divine. A college roommate who
became a priest taught me this.

Well, college roommates are omniscient, you know.