Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Harry's recent "incident"

On 11/6/2014 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:49:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/6/2014 12:34 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:53:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not being a military trained combat warrior like Greg, Herring, FlaGrim,
et al, I'm not afraid to play my hand.

This is not military combat it is urban warfare and I have had more
than my share of getting in the middle of wife/girlfriend spats with
their abusive partner. It is usually an unrewarding encounter because
they seldom change anything. I have been in physical encounters but
simply talking it out works out better for everyone involved.


As I have long suspected, they
are heavily armed...pussies.

You seem to be more heavily armed than anyone else here.




Greg, no offense, but you seem to think you are the only person on the
planet who has any experience with violence, police, lawyers, lawsuits
or domestic spats.


I have had more than my share of experience but I am older and wiser
now. I am also not so insecure that I can't admit it.

Why is the idea of NOT starting a fist fight being seen as wrong here?
You keep saying we are not in the 1800s but you support vigilantes.



The discussion was about the action Harry took when coming upon a guy
physically abusing a woman and a child.

For the 5th or 6th time ... according to Harry's account he did *not*
start a fist fight. He approached the guy and asked him to stop. The
guy took a swing at Harry. Harry swung back.

I don't call that "starting" a fist fight.


  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2014
Posts: 580
Default Harry's recent "incident"

On 11/6/2014 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:49:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/6/2014 12:34 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:53:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not being a military trained combat warrior like Greg, Herring,
FlaGrim,
et al, I'm not afraid to play my hand.

This is not military combat it is urban warfare and I have had more
than my share of getting in the middle of wife/girlfriend spats with
their abusive partner. It is usually an unrewarding encounter because
they seldom change anything. I have been in physical encounters but
simply talking it out works out better for everyone involved.


As I have long suspected, they
are heavily armed...pussies.

You seem to be more heavily armed than anyone else here.




Greg, no offense, but you seem to think you are the only person on the
planet who has any experience with violence, police, lawyers, lawsuits
or domestic spats.


I have had more than my share of experience but I am older and wiser
now. I am also not so insecure that I can't admit it.

Why is the idea of NOT starting a fist fight being seen as wrong here?
You keep saying we are not in the 1800s but you support vigilantes.



The discussion was about the action Harry took when coming upon a guy
physically abusing a woman and a child.

For the 5th or 6th time ... according to Harry's account he did *not*
start a fist fight. He approached the guy and asked him to stop. The
guy took a swing at Harry. Harry swung back.

I don't call that "starting" a fist fight.



He did strike the first blow on the boney little guy.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Harry's recent "incident"

On 11/6/2014 3:36 PM, Harrold wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:49:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/6/2014 12:34 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:53:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not being a military trained combat warrior like Greg, Herring,
FlaGrim,
et al, I'm not afraid to play my hand.

This is not military combat it is urban warfare and I have had more
than my share of getting in the middle of wife/girlfriend spats with
their abusive partner. It is usually an unrewarding encounter because
they seldom change anything. I have been in physical encounters but
simply talking it out works out better for everyone involved.


As I have long suspected, they
are heavily armed...pussies.

You seem to be more heavily armed than anyone else here.




Greg, no offense, but you seem to think you are the only person on the
planet who has any experience with violence, police, lawyers, lawsuits
or domestic spats.


I have had more than my share of experience but I am older and wiser
now. I am also not so insecure that I can't admit it.

Why is the idea of NOT starting a fist fight being seen as wrong here?
You keep saying we are not in the 1800s but you support vigilantes.



The discussion was about the action Harry took when coming upon a guy
physically abusing a woman and a child.

For the 5th or 6th time ... according to Harry's account he did *not*
start a fist fight. He approached the guy and asked him to stop. The
guy took a swing at Harry. Harry swung back.

I don't call that "starting" a fist fight.



He did strike the first blow on the boney little guy.


sigh


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2014
Posts: 580
Default Harry's recent "incident"

On 11/6/2014 3:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:36 PM, Harrold wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:49:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/6/2014 12:34 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:53:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not being a military trained combat warrior like Greg, Herring,
FlaGrim,
et al, I'm not afraid to play my hand.

This is not military combat it is urban warfare and I have had more
than my share of getting in the middle of wife/girlfriend spats with
their abusive partner. It is usually an unrewarding encounter because
they seldom change anything. I have been in physical encounters but
simply talking it out works out better for everyone involved.


As I have long suspected, they
are heavily armed...pussies.

You seem to be more heavily armed than anyone else here.




Greg, no offense, but you seem to think you are the only person on the
planet who has any experience with violence, police, lawyers, lawsuits
or domestic spats.


I have had more than my share of experience but I am older and wiser
now. I am also not so insecure that I can't admit it.

Why is the idea of NOT starting a fist fight being seen as wrong here?
You keep saying we are not in the 1800s but you support vigilantes.



The discussion was about the action Harry took when coming upon a guy
physically abusing a woman and a child.

For the 5th or 6th time ... according to Harry's account he did *not*
start a fist fight. He approached the guy and asked him to stop. The
guy took a swing at Harry. Harry swung back.

I don't call that "starting" a fist fight.



He did strike the first blow on the boney little guy.


sigh

In fact, the boney little guy never even landed a punch.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Harry's recent "incident"

On 11/6/2014 3:43 PM, Harrold wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:36 PM, Harrold wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:49:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/6/2014 12:34 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:53:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not being a military trained combat warrior like Greg, Herring,
FlaGrim,
et al, I'm not afraid to play my hand.

This is not military combat it is urban warfare and I have had more
than my share of getting in the middle of wife/girlfriend spats with
their abusive partner. It is usually an unrewarding encounter
because
they seldom change anything. I have been in physical encounters but
simply talking it out works out better for everyone involved.


As I have long suspected, they
are heavily armed...pussies.

You seem to be more heavily armed than anyone else here.




Greg, no offense, but you seem to think you are the only person on
the
planet who has any experience with violence, police, lawyers,
lawsuits
or domestic spats.


I have had more than my share of experience but I am older and wiser
now. I am also not so insecure that I can't admit it.

Why is the idea of NOT starting a fist fight being seen as wrong here?
You keep saying we are not in the 1800s but you support vigilantes.



The discussion was about the action Harry took when coming upon a guy
physically abusing a woman and a child.

For the 5th or 6th time ... according to Harry's account he did *not*
start a fist fight. He approached the guy and asked him to stop. The
guy took a swing at Harry. Harry swung back.

I don't call that "starting" a fist fight.



He did strike the first blow on the boney little guy.


sigh

In fact, the boney little guy never even landed a punch.



Come on. Are you telling me that if someone takes a swing at you and
misses, you'd just stand there like a doofus until he connected?

It's called self defense.


  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
KC KC is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,563
Default Harry's recent "incident"

On 11/6/2014 3:46 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:43 PM, Harrold wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:36 PM, Harrold wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:49:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:

On 11/6/2014 12:34 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:53:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not being a military trained combat warrior like Greg, Herring,
FlaGrim,
et al, I'm not afraid to play my hand.

This is not military combat it is urban warfare and I have had more
than my share of getting in the middle of wife/girlfriend spats
with
their abusive partner. It is usually an unrewarding encounter
because
they seldom change anything. I have been in physical encounters but
simply talking it out works out better for everyone involved.


As I have long suspected, they
are heavily armed...pussies.

You seem to be more heavily armed than anyone else here.




Greg, no offense, but you seem to think you are the only person on
the
planet who has any experience with violence, police, lawyers,
lawsuits
or domestic spats.


I have had more than my share of experience but I am older and wiser
now. I am also not so insecure that I can't admit it.

Why is the idea of NOT starting a fist fight being seen as wrong
here?
You keep saying we are not in the 1800s but you support vigilantes.



The discussion was about the action Harry took when coming upon a guy
physically abusing a woman and a child.

For the 5th or 6th time ... according to Harry's account he did *not*
start a fist fight. He approached the guy and asked him to stop. The
guy took a swing at Harry. Harry swung back.

I don't call that "starting" a fist fight.



He did strike the first blow on the boney little guy.

sigh

In fact, the boney little guy never even landed a punch.



Come on. Are you telling me that if someone takes a swing at you and
misses, you'd just stand there like a doofus until he connected?

It's called self defense.



maybe, maybe not... depends on the situation. Either way, truth be told
I doubt any of this "hero" story is real. I mean, he's scared to death
enough of me to call the cops for an imagined internet threat and I am
only 5'7"... he lives with loaded guns ready to blow anybody away that
says boo.... do you really think harry approached anybody?
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,524
Default Harry's recent "incident"

On 11/6/14 3:46 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:43 PM, Harrold wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:36 PM, Harrold wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:49:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:

On 11/6/2014 12:34 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:53:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not being a military trained combat warrior like Greg, Herring,
FlaGrim,
et al, I'm not afraid to play my hand.

This is not military combat it is urban warfare and I have had more
than my share of getting in the middle of wife/girlfriend spats
with
their abusive partner. It is usually an unrewarding encounter
because
they seldom change anything. I have been in physical encounters but
simply talking it out works out better for everyone involved.


As I have long suspected, they
are heavily armed...pussies.

You seem to be more heavily armed than anyone else here.




Greg, no offense, but you seem to think you are the only person on
the
planet who has any experience with violence, police, lawyers,
lawsuits
or domestic spats.


I have had more than my share of experience but I am older and wiser
now. I am also not so insecure that I can't admit it.

Why is the idea of NOT starting a fist fight being seen as wrong
here?
You keep saying we are not in the 1800s but you support vigilantes.



The discussion was about the action Harry took when coming upon a guy
physically abusing a woman and a child.

For the 5th or 6th time ... according to Harry's account he did *not*
start a fist fight. He approached the guy and asked him to stop. The
guy took a swing at Harry. Harry swung back.

I don't call that "starting" a fist fight.



He did strike the first blow on the boney little guy.

sigh

In fact, the boney little guy never even landed a punch.



Come on. Are you telling me that if someone takes a swing at you and
misses, you'd just stand there like a doofus until he connected?

It's called self defense.



You are trying to reason with someone no brighter than the Scotties.

--
“There’s more idleness and abuse of government favors among the
economically privileged than among the ranks of the disadvantaged.” -
Norman Mailer
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2014
Posts: 580
Default Harry's recent "incident"

On 11/6/2014 3:46 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:43 PM, Harrold wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:36 PM, Harrold wrote:
On 11/6/2014 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2014 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:49:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:

On 11/6/2014 12:34 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:53:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not being a military trained combat warrior like Greg, Herring,
FlaGrim,
et al, I'm not afraid to play my hand.

This is not military combat it is urban warfare and I have had more
than my share of getting in the middle of wife/girlfriend spats
with
their abusive partner. It is usually an unrewarding encounter
because
they seldom change anything. I have been in physical encounters but
simply talking it out works out better for everyone involved.


As I have long suspected, they
are heavily armed...pussies.

You seem to be more heavily armed than anyone else here.




Greg, no offense, but you seem to think you are the only person on
the
planet who has any experience with violence, police, lawyers,
lawsuits
or domestic spats.


I have had more than my share of experience but I am older and wiser
now. I am also not so insecure that I can't admit it.

Why is the idea of NOT starting a fist fight being seen as wrong
here?
You keep saying we are not in the 1800s but you support vigilantes.



The discussion was about the action Harry took when coming upon a guy
physically abusing a woman and a child.

For the 5th or 6th time ... according to Harry's account he did *not*
start a fist fight. He approached the guy and asked him to stop. The
guy took a swing at Harry. Harry swung back.

I don't call that "starting" a fist fight.



He did strike the first blow on the boney little guy.

sigh

In fact, the boney little guy never even landed a punch.



Come on. Are you telling me that if someone takes a swing at you and
misses, you'd just stand there like a doofus until he connected?

It's called self defense.



It depends. The little fella might have been intimidated by the size and
girth of Krause. Krause was obviously invading his space. The little guy
was probably analyzing his fight or flight options and decided that his
first move was to strike out at the large fat man who was invading his
space. The large fat man mustered all of his strength to swing at the
little guy and struck him god knows where, breaking several bones in his
wrist? hand? arm? No mention was made of what happened after, other than
Krause was rushed to the hospital in severe pain.
If you analyze Harry's story you'll realize it's like Swiss cheese.
You must be bored to be involving yourself in this nonsense.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Harry Krause in his own words. He's "knee deep in boat heritage." [email protected] General 3 April 8th 14 04:58 PM
Hey Harry...this your " buddy " Herring? Scott Dickson General 20 November 15th 09 05:30 AM
A test for Harry, "I am not a racist", Krause Jim General 1 November 13th 08 03:45 PM
Did Harry get a reduced rate at the "Del"? [email protected] General 4 March 25th 08 12:26 PM
Lets get back to an "On Topic" N/G Yo Harry, Eisboch, Shortwave, Calif Bill, Gene, basskisser, Chuck and all the other regulars. FREDO General 11 July 31st 06 07:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017