![]() |
Harry's recent "incident"
|
Harry's recent "incident"
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 20:33:47 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/6/14 7:58 PM, wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 14:57:38 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/6/14 2:52 PM, wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:46:39 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/6/14 12:34 PM, wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:53:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: Not being a military trained combat warrior like Greg, Herring, FlaGrim, et al, I'm not afraid to play my hand. This is not military combat it is urban warfare and I have had more than my share of getting in the middle of wife/girlfriend spats with their abusive partner. It is usually an unrewarding encounter because they seldom change anything. I have been in physical encounters but simply talking it out works out better for everyone involved. As I have long suspected, they are heavily armed...pussies. You seem to be more heavily armed than anyone else here. Ahh, but I am not a heavily armed *pussy*, like most of you righties. It is a brave man who uses language like that on the internet. I am sure if I was looking you in the eye, you would be more humble. Please. I've known some really tough guys. You ain't one of them. He is really a bad ass on line isn't he? You're the one who claimed your physical presence would "humble" me. I'd probably just hand you $50 for a haircut and a shave. I think the presence of any of the people you slander here would humble you. Snerk -- Posted from my iPhone 6+. |
Harry's recent "incident"
On 11/6/2014 8:17 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 15:08:58 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/6/2014 2:50 PM, wrote: Yup. We've become a nation governed by political correctness and self concerns. Let the ones being battered fend for themselves. No leave it to the police. Being a vigilante is not legal or wise these days. Ask Zimmerman. Blame it on the lawyers. Problem is the police are not always available at the moment of the assault. If I came upon an altercation with two seemingly equal opponents I'd likely mind my own business. But, as in the situation Harry came upon, it involves a guy beating up on a woman and/or child, or someone beating up on a defenseless elderly person, I'd would do my best to intervene. How about a situation when someone is being assaulted and crying out "Help"? I would certainly take time to assess the situation unless it was a situation where the "use of force:" was clearly present. (imminent threat of grave bodily harm) If that is true, I would have the cops coming before I did anything. I am still going to be trying to talk this guy down, outside of "swing" distance. If this guy keeps pounding on his wife/GF while I am taking cell phone pictures and hollering at him to stop, I would feel better about trying to hurt him. If there was any question at all, Zimmerman cleared it up. The use of force is a high hurdle to leap. You never know when you jump in, where this is going to go. I am too damned old to just trade blows with someone like I did when I was young. I am going for a "stopper" and those can cause permanent injuries or death. It is the intent. When you watch your best friend go to prison for a fist fight gone bad, you become a lot more cautious. I trained with him. Harry is damned lucky the guy he knocked down, was not seriously hurt. If he calls a lawyer, his sweety is just as likely to be saying Harry was the aggressor as not, particularly if they have made up already. Promises of a big payday can make a troubled relationship stronger. Like I said, blame it on the lawyers. Yup, it's all about what you can prove. I know a mx kid who caught a guy stealing his mountain bike. He chased the thief down and really kicked the guys ass.. lot's of tissue and blood all over his work boots, and he posted a picture... I told the kid to take the pic right down cause although he might not be able to prove the guy tried to steal his bike, the guy could sure prove our friend kicked his ass good. All the guy has to do is say "I was walking by and the guy came out and kicked my ass"... and our bud would be ****ed... |
Harry's recent "incident"
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 20:33:47 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/6/14 7:58 PM, wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 14:57:38 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/6/14 2:52 PM, wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:46:39 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/6/14 12:34 PM, wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:53:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: Not being a military trained combat warrior like Greg, Herring, FlaGrim, et al, I'm not afraid to play my hand. This is not military combat it is urban warfare and I have had more than my share of getting in the middle of wife/girlfriend spats with their abusive partner. It is usually an unrewarding encounter because they seldom change anything. I have been in physical encounters but simply talking it out works out better for everyone involved. As I have long suspected, they are heavily armed...pussies. You seem to be more heavily armed than anyone else here. Ahh, but I am not a heavily armed *pussy*, like most of you righties. It is a brave man who uses language like that on the internet. I am sure if I was looking you in the eye, you would be more humble. Please. I've known some really tough guys. You ain't one of them. He is really a bad ass on line isn't he? You're the one who claimed your physical presence would "humble" me. I'd probably just hand you $50 for a haircut and a shave. I think the presence of any of the people you slander here would humble you. He has gone bankrupt twice, so probably not subject to being sued. Just jail for assault. |
Harry's recent "incident"
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/6/14 4:26 PM, Califbill wrote: F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/6/14 2:50 PM, wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:44:44 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/6/2014 12:27 PM, wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:39:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/6/2014 10:48 AM, wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 06:53:33 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/6/14 12:19 AM, wrote: On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:33:53 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/5/14 11:57 AM, wrote: That is what Zimmerman said Gee, Greg, I used to think you were one of the few bright right wingers in this sea of conservative stupidity, but now I am realizing you are just as dimwitted as flajim, psychoscotty, herring, and a few others in that crowd of intellectually disableds. Are you really saying the only way you could deal with this was to get in a fist fight? How would you have dealt with it if this guy was not such an easy guy to beat up? I realize I don't have the frontline combat experience of you and some of the other right-wingers here, so perhaps I should've waited for the guy to really beat the crap out of that woman. I was not intending to trade punches with the fellow. I simply walked over to where they were and asked him to stop. He responded by taking a swing at me and he missed. My reflexes took over and I hit him as hard as i could. End of fight. I don't know whether he was easy to beat up or not... I landed a Lucky punch. My point and the same thing I said about Zimmerman is you should have never got close enough to him to allow him to take a swing at you. It is basic self defense 101. If you were going to try to talk this guy down, you can do it from 10 feet away, 20 is better. If your intent was to get in a fight from the beginning, then you should just go hit the guy. In the end you are not on much firmer ground is you just provoked the fight Perhaps you would've stood your ground and shot him. You seem trigger-happy. All I ever said about this is you could have been shot, other than to point out that if your "lucky punch" turned out to be fatal, you have as good a chance of going to jail as if you shot him. I know a guy who did 7 years in Maryland for a "lucky punch" in what most people would say was a more justifiable situation (attempting to remove an unwelcome person from his home) I hope you get better soon. Your depth of knowledge is beyond amazing Greg. Now you are an expert on the proper manner in which to come to the aid of a woman and child being physically abused by a guy. "Excuse me sir, (from 20 feet away) not to interrupt, but would you mind refraining from slapping them around? I have an iPhone here and I know how to use it." I have been involved with these things more times than I like to think about and I know a lot of cops. Women tend to stand by their man, no matter what a weasel he is. As for the self defense issue. I have taken the course several times and they all emphasize, distance is your friend. If you do not want to end up in a fist fight or a scramble on the ground, keep some distance. If you want to fight, just give them your best shot right away and be prepared to face the consequences. Just don't be surprised if the woman you "rescued" testifies against you. She is still going to go home and sleep with the weasel about 90% of the time. (just look at all of those football players and the women they beat the **** out of) This "Don Quixote" stuff is great in the movies but don't count on Dulcinea taking your side when it is all over. Yup. We've become a nation governed by political correctness and self concerns. Let the ones being battered fend for themselves. No leave it to the police. Being a vigilante is not legal or wise these days. Ask Zimmerman. Blame it on the lawyers. Wow. A right wing libertarian who says leave it to the police. I can envision you and your gun nutzi 2A buddies here standing on the sidewalk with your hands in your pockets watching some thug beat up a woman or a child. Brave men, all of you. You seem to be the gun nutz here! Bragging about all the guns you buy and sell, and build. A gun nutzi is someone who puts the 2A ahead of common sense. Nope! |
Quote:
|
Looks to me like Harry saw a damsel in distress and he went to her aid. I commend him for his actions. The what-ifs of this situation are many and domestic disputes are ones that we should be careful to involve ourselves in.
|
Harry's recent "incident"
wrote:
On 7 Nov 2014 02:42:11 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: wrote: Why don't you give us enough information to find the police report and we can all decide. Extra credit if your name is in it as a witness. Don't read for comprehension? The woman didn't want to call the police. She left with her kid. The guy left. I left. I am not aware of a report being filed. See my first post in this thread. OK so you saw a crime that justified the use of force but it was not worth reporting. Something is not right here. Spousal abuse is a crime against the state. These women would never get any help if it wasn't.. All you did was assure she gets a little extra slapping around when they get home. Wow. A lecture on civic duty from a gun nutzi too much of a pussy to come to the aid of a damsel in distress. -- Posted from my iPhone 6+. |
Harry's recent "incident"
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com