![]() |
Had to share this story
On 11/4/2014 6:01 PM, John H wrote:
On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 4:12:56 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2014 3:52 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/4/14 2:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Not all conservatives. It seems to only be the hard right. Seemed as though there were a lot of Democrats and almost *all* of the Republican senators who voted against stricter gun controls here recently. To say only the 'hard right' is far from accurate. John, you snipped Harry's paragraph to which my response was directed: "Conservatives have used the same excuses to fight the end of slavery, the end of child labor, to fight against giving women the vote, to fight against the passage of the civil rights act." |
Had to share this story
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:12:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: If gun ownership is important to people, they should be applying their thought process towards constructive ways to reduce gun crimes === First, you've got to solve the drug problem. Next, you've got to tackle the inner city violence problem. Last but not necessarily least, you've got to solve the violence in media problem. You're trying to waltz around the symptoms while ignoring the root causes. Yes, I know that it would be easier to repeal the 2A than solve the 3 above, but at least you'd be working in the right direction. With regard to gun accidents, I really don't see that as a major issue. |
Had to share this story
On 11/4/2014 6:27 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:12:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: If gun ownership is important to people, they should be applying their thought process towards constructive ways to reduce gun crimes === First, you've got to solve the drug problem. Next, you've got to tackle the inner city violence problem. Last but not necessarily least, you've got to solve the violence in media problem. You're trying to waltz around the symptoms while ignoring the root causes. Yes, I know that it would be easier to repeal the 2A than solve the 3 above, but at least you'd be working in the right direction. With regard to gun accidents, I really don't see that as a major issue. I agree with those. I also agree they are probably more difficult to solve than just banning guns altogether which will *not* solve the drug, inner city violence or media problems. I have concerns that if nothing is done the easier route will become the preferred route by our government, especially if we continue to see these wackos conducting mass killings. I don't think the 2A will ever be repealed entirely but it may be modified or re-interpreted by a more liberal Supreme Court some day in the future. That's why, as a gun owner, having some willingness to tighten up on some of the gun laws and work on eliminating the illegal gun trade and loopholes may demonstrate a cooperative spirit that takes some of the wind out of the sails of those who advocate much more severe restrictions or outright bans. I don't advocate the banning of guns, despite what some may have concluded. |
Had to share this story
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:10:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 11/4/2014 6:01 PM, John H wrote: On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 4:12:56 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2014 3:52 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/4/14 2:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Not all conservatives. It seems to only be the hard right. Seemed as though there were a lot of Democrats and almost *all* of the Republican senators who voted against stricter gun controls here recently. To say only the 'hard right' is far from accurate. John, you snipped Harry's paragraph to which my response was directed: "Conservatives have used the same excuses to fight the end of slavery, the end of child labor, to fight against giving women the vote, to fight against the passage of the civil rights act." So your comment had nothing to do with the 'hard right' excuses not having stricter gun controls? That makes little sense given the subject of the discussion. I don't recall anyone mentioning 2A with regard to any of those 'excuses'. If you've decided to use the lame, bull**** quotes of Krause, then do it on your own. |
Had to share this story
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 17:09:33 -0600, Califbill
wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/4/2014 2:05 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:26:22 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 11/4/2014 9:58 AM, KC wrote: On 11/4/2014 9:47 AM, wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 01:58:45 -0600, Califbill wrote: You don't give kids enough credit. They are useless feel good devices similar to useless feel good laws. Just go in my garage and get an angle grinder or dremel or the cutting torch. I opened the trigger lock I have with a paper clip and didn't damage it at all. Mom and Dad would have no idea I have free access to the gun Like to see that vid... Me too. Kids using angle grinders, cutting torches and dremel tools. There's another solution. Don't have guns around when you have kids in the household. I never felt a desire or need for having guns in the house while we were raising our three kids. I didn't hunt and guns really didn't hold that much interest to me. It wasn't until about four years ago that I decided to get a permit. Part of the reasoning was because of the great guitar shop experiment that involved carrying a relatively large amount of cash and the recommendation of a lawyer. The other was the recognition that I was getting older, we had already experienced a home invasion and I wanted a last resort means of defending my wife and I other than a baseball bat. My parents gave me a .22 rifle when I was 12 years old. I still have it and will have it until the day I die. It has never killed a living breathing animal or human. It has destroyed countless targets. I received the firearm about 41 years ago and it has been in my possession every where I have lived since I received it. My kids didn't know about it until they were about 14 or 15. I was about the same age when I got mine. There were other guns in the house, my dad's, my grandfathers, several shotguns and rifles. I had three younger brothers at the time, and we had no special way we secured the weapons. They were kept in a closet...no lock or keys. Somehow we all lived, and no one had an accident. Uh-Huh. Did you have violent video games and gory movies back then that glorified killing and maiming with blood spurting out of gunshot wounds and guts plastering the walls? Or did you watch Davey Crockett and Daniel Boone like I did? This is a different age and a different society John. It's not the 1940's and 1950's. This thread has amazed me about one thing. It's incredible how many reasons and excuses people can come up with *not* to try anything to reduce gun related crimes or accidents. I guess most people here think everything is just hunky-dory fine the way things are. Sad. I think that most of us would support gun laws if they had a chance to reduce the violence. But, with as you pointed out the violent movies and games, and the culture of violence in certain areas, lots related to the Drug War, we do not see most gun laws being proposed not be other than feel good ****. No real worth. How many of those teenagers killing other teenagers and young adults in Chicago, Oakland, Detroit, Bakersfield are going to be affected by any of these new gun laws? They do not seem to care about the thousands of gun laws we now have. And law enforcement seems to have about the same concern. |
Had to share this story
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:46:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: That's why, as a gun owner, having some willingness to tighten up on some of the gun laws and work on eliminating the illegal gun trade and loopholes may demonstrate a cooperative spirit that takes some of the wind out of the sails of those who advocate much more severe restrictions or outright bans. === With all due respect I see that as appeasement of the mass hysteria without doing a thing to address the real issues. |
Had to share this story
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:53:53 -0500, Poco Loco
wrote: I suppose you missed putting undercover cops in the gun shows where all the illegal transactions occur. === I have reason to think that it is already happening. I was talking to a guy running a booth at our local gun show a few years ago. He was selling a few highly specialized High Standard target pistols, not exactly your typical gun dealer, and not exactly your typical choice of a crime weapon. He told me that BATF (or whatever they are called now) had come to him and said that he needed to be an FFL. My conclusion is that someone *is* keeping an eye on this sort of thing. |
Had to share this story
On 11/4/2014 2:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/4/2014 2:05 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:26:22 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 11/4/2014 9:58 AM, KC wrote: On 11/4/2014 9:47 AM, wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 01:58:45 -0600, Califbill wrote: You don't give kids enough credit. They are useless feel good devices similar to useless feel good laws. Just go in my garage and get an angle grinder or dremel or the cutting torch. I opened the trigger lock I have with a paper clip and didn't damage it at all. Mom and Dad would have no idea I have free access to the gun Like to see that vid... Me too. Kids using angle grinders, cutting torches and dremel tools. There's another solution. Don't have guns around when you have kids in the household. I never felt a desire or need for having guns in the house while we were raising our three kids. I didn't hunt and guns really didn't hold that much interest to me. It wasn't until about four years ago that I decided to get a permit. Part of the reasoning was because of the great guitar shop experiment that involved carrying a relatively large amount of cash and the recommendation of a lawyer. The other was the recognition that I was getting older, we had already experienced a home invasion and I wanted a last resort means of defending my wife and I other than a baseball bat. My parents gave me a .22 rifle when I was 12 years old. I still have it and will have it until the day I die. It has never killed a living breathing animal or human. It has destroyed countless targets. I received the firearm about 41 years ago and it has been in my possession every where I have lived since I received it. My kids didn't know about it until they were about 14 or 15. I was about the same age when I got mine. There were other guns in the house, my dad's, my grandfathers, several shotguns and rifles. I had three younger brothers at the time, and we had no special way we secured the weapons. They were kept in a closet...no lock or keys. Somehow we all lived, and no one had an accident. Uh-Huh. Did you have violent video games and gory movies back then that glorified killing and maiming with blood spurting out of gunshot wounds and guts plastering the walls? Or did you watch Davey Crockett and Daniel Boone like I did? This is a different age and a different society John. It's not the 1940's and 1950's. This thread has amazed me about one thing. It's incredible how many reasons and excuses people can come up with *not* to try anything to reduce gun related crimes or accidents. I guess most people here think everything is just hunky-dory fine the way things are. Sad. Even more than the violence in these video games I am concerened that most 10 year olds have already been trained by these things with nearly as much tactical information as most cops... They know how cops and military move, clear buildings, operate in general, what weapons they have, etc.... I just don't like 10 year olds that know how to kill so many people and how long it will take, what it will look like, etc.... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com