On 6/12/2014 8:27 AM, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:
On 6/12/2014 8:12 AM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 6/12/2014 7:43 AM, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:
On 6/11/2014 9:33 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/11/2014 9:09 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 20:34:55 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:

On 6/11/2014 7:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:45:21 -0400, Earl wrote:

Your theory is solid except for .22LR. I can't figure that one
out.

===

That will ease up also after everyone has stocked up with the
obligatory lifetime supply. At that point the hoarders and
speculators will be out of the market and things will return to
normal.


I have two .22 cal guns .. a Ruger SR22 pistol and a Ruger 10/22
rifle.
When I purchased them the dealer threw in a box of 500 rounds for
each
gun.

I also have a couple of boxes that I had purchased previously for
another .22 cal revolver I had. I don't shoot the .22's very
often so
I suspect my stash will last a while.

What I need is .380 ammo. I just bought another handgun earlier
this
week for the first time in a long time. I've been thinking about a
compact pocket pistol to replace the S&W Bodyguard 380 that I had
but
didn't like. Choices are limited here in MA because of the famous
"banned" list by the Attorney General's office.

I happened to visit the local gun shop I go to this past
Monday. He
had two Sig Sauer P228s in the case. One had fancy engraving and
pearl
grips. Too over the top for me. The other was more plain but had
nice
looking rosewood grips instead of the baseline black. I liked
that one
and temptation overcame logic and it went home with me. Looks
identical
to this:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...sauer-P238.jpg



I guess the law there makes internet sales illegal.


Very few dealers will even consider shipping to a FFL in MA because of
the confusion on what's banned and what's not. Shipping directly
to the
buyer is not permitted obviously. Heck, I can't even buy ammo
on-line.
MA doesn't allow that.

Many of the manufacturers of popular handguns don't bother trying
to get
their models approved here either. Too much red tape and I think they
have to provide a minimum of five of each model to be tested. They
are
destroyed in the process and there's no guarantee it will be approved.
Some of the rules are just plain stupid. One popular model (I
think
it was a Ruger) was banned because the AG didn't like where the
serial
number was placed. I guess the AG's office wants Ruger to modify
their
production line just to meet their opinion of where it should be.






Is that why you didn't consider the LCP?

I considered it because I like Ruger firearms but the LCP is not MA
compliant.

Not enough kick-backs to the various approving boards?

Graft, greed, nannyisnm and corruption will always be a part of the
liberal way of life


I don't think it is CA compliant either.