.... of the country expressed with Gimp2


http://i802.photobucket.com/albums/yy303/Eisboch/Bailing.jpg

On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!


--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant.

On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!


--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant.


She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her
biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility.

She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early.

On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!


--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant.


She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her
biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility.

She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early.



It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic
Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of
this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11.

--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

On 2/1/2014 3:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!


--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant.


She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her
biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full
responsibility.

She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early.



It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic
Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of
this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11.


Name a serious Republican candidate who you would actually vote for in 2016.

On 2/1/2014 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!


--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant.


She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her
biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility.

She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early.



Oh good. Now she has a clean slate. ;-)

"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/1/2014 3:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!


--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant.


She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her
biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full
responsibility.

She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early.



It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic
Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of
this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11.


Name a serious Republican candidate who you would actually vote for in 2016.

Who are the serious GOP candidates ?

On 2/1/2014 4:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/1/2014 3:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!


--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant.


She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her
biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full
responsibility.

She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early.



It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic
Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of
this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11.


Name a serious Republican candidate who you would actually vote for in 2016.

Who are the serious GOP candidates ?


You know what I meant. You are a straight Democratic voter, regardless
of who is running, so it's a non-issue to you.

On 2/1/14, 4:56 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 4:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/1/2014 3:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!


--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant.


She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her
biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full
responsibility.

She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early.



It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic
Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of
this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11.


Name a serious Republican candidate who you would actually vote for
in 2016.

Who are the serious GOP candidates ?


You know what I meant. You are a straight Democratic voter, regardless
of who is running, so it's a non-issue to you.



I've seen nothing to indicate that the GOP nominating apparatus won't be
in the hands of people who would nominate a Cruz, a Paul, a Rubio, a
Ryan. or even worse, all right-wingers, and some of whom are or border
on insanity. When Christie was considered a GOP front-runner by many,
the teabaggers and other ultra-cons started trashing him. It's not
likely a moderate will capture the GOP nomination.

No, I'm not going to vote for any Republicans like those. If Mrs.
Clinton runs, I will be happy as a clam to vote for her.

--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

On 2/1/2014 5:28 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/1/14, 4:56 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 4:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/1/2014 3:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!


--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant.


She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her
biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full
responsibility.

She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early.



It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic
Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of
this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11.


Name a serious Republican candidate who you would actually vote for
in 2016.

Who are the serious GOP candidates ?


You know what I meant. You are a straight Democratic voter, regardless
of who is running, so it's a non-issue to you.



I've seen nothing to indicate that the GOP nominating apparatus won't be
in the hands of people who would nominate a Cruz, a Paul, a Rubio, a
Ryan. or even worse, all right-wingers, and some of whom are or border
on insanity. When Christie was considered a GOP front-runner by many,
the teabaggers and other ultra-cons started trashing him. It's not
likely a moderate will capture the GOP nomination.

No, I'm not going to vote for any Republicans like those. If Mrs.
Clinton runs, I will be happy as a clam to vote for her.


So that is already determined in your mind even without knowing who the
other candidates may be. I really can't consider that being an educated
voter or having been subject to any "critical thinking".