![]() |
Current Mood ...
.... of the country expressed with Gimp2
http://i802.photobucket.com/albums/yy303/Eisboch/Bailing.jpg |
Current Mood ...
On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi! :) -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant. |
Current Mood ...
On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi! :) -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant. She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility. She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early. |
Current Mood ...
On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote: On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi! :) -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant. She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility. She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early. It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
Current Mood ...
On 2/1/2014 3:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote: On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi! :) -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant. She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility. She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early. It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11. Name a serious Republican candidate who you would actually vote for in 2016. |
Current Mood ...
On 2/1/2014 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote: On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi! :) -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant. She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility. She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early. Oh good. Now she has a clean slate. ;-) |
Current Mood ...
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/1/2014 3:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote: On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi! :) -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant. She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility. She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early. It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11. Name a serious Republican candidate who you would actually vote for in 2016. Who are the serious GOP candidates ? |
Current Mood ...
On 2/1/2014 4:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/1/2014 3:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote: On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi! :) -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant. She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility. She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early. It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11. Name a serious Republican candidate who you would actually vote for in 2016. Who are the serious GOP candidates ? You know what I meant. You are a straight Democratic voter, regardless of who is running, so it's a non-issue to you. |
Current Mood ...
On 2/1/14, 4:56 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2014 4:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/1/2014 3:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote: On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi! :) -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant. She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility. She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early. It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11. Name a serious Republican candidate who you would actually vote for in 2016. Who are the serious GOP candidates ? You know what I meant. You are a straight Democratic voter, regardless of who is running, so it's a non-issue to you. I've seen nothing to indicate that the GOP nominating apparatus won't be in the hands of people who would nominate a Cruz, a Paul, a Rubio, a Ryan. or even worse, all right-wingers, and some of whom are or border on insanity. When Christie was considered a GOP front-runner by many, the teabaggers and other ultra-cons started trashing him. It's not likely a moderate will capture the GOP nomination. No, I'm not going to vote for any Republicans like those. If Mrs. Clinton runs, I will be happy as a clam to vote for her. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
Current Mood ...
On 2/1/2014 5:28 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/1/14, 4:56 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/1/2014 4:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/1/2014 3:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/1/14, 2:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/1/2014 11:48 AM, Hank wrote: On 2/1/2014 10:50 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh nooo...Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi! :) -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. Probably won't see Billery uttering that chant. She has already made the media rounds, describing Benghazi as her biggest disappointment as Sec. of State and accepting full responsibility. She's getting that issue taken care of and out of the way early. It's a non-issue except to those who wouldn't vote for any Democratic Party candidate. The righties are trying to make a bigger issue out of this for Hillary than they did when Dumfoch Dubya presided over 9/11. Name a serious Republican candidate who you would actually vote for in 2016. Who are the serious GOP candidates ? You know what I meant. You are a straight Democratic voter, regardless of who is running, so it's a non-issue to you. I've seen nothing to indicate that the GOP nominating apparatus won't be in the hands of people who would nominate a Cruz, a Paul, a Rubio, a Ryan. or even worse, all right-wingers, and some of whom are or border on insanity. When Christie was considered a GOP front-runner by many, the teabaggers and other ultra-cons started trashing him. It's not likely a moderate will capture the GOP nomination. No, I'm not going to vote for any Republicans like those. If Mrs. Clinton runs, I will be happy as a clam to vote for her. So that is already determined in your mind even without knowing who the other candidates may be. I really can't consider that being an educated voter or having been subject to any "critical thinking". |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com