Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Current Mood ...

On 2/2/14, 11:58 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 10:51:07 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/2/14, 10:33 AM,
wrote:

I bet all of that White Water/Rose Law firm stuff comes up again. In
1992 it was written off as being Hillary's deal that Bill said he had
no part in.
We might even hear about Hillary's contribution to Walmart moving from
a "buy American" company to the China outlet mall they became while
she was sitting on their board.

I still think it will be health and age that keeps her from running.



Hillary's former law firm, et cetera, will only be an issue for those
voters who wouldn't vote for her under any circumstances. Using that
crap is just appealing to the base. *If* she decides to run, she will
clean the clock of any of the sane Republicans with wide appeal who so
far have expressed even a semi-serious interest. For the moment, though,
I can't think of the names of those "sane" Republicans. Who are they?


Jeb is pretty sane but I doubt he will run.

I do tend to agree, there are not really any attractive candidates ...
from either side. It is probably why I have not voted for a major
party candidate since 1988 and I was wrong then.


It's been a long time since Jeb has run for office, and he has *that*
last name. I don't have a problem with Hillary as POTUS if she decides
to run. I don't think Biden is really interested. I don't know who else
might consider it on the Dem side. There was talk of Elizabeth Warren
but she says she isn't interested. Martin O'Malley? John Tester?



--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.
  #26   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Current Mood ...

On 2/2/2014 5:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:27:22 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 2/2/2014 3:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 11:58:27 -0500, wrote:

Jeb is pretty sane but I doubt he will run.

===

Too bad because I think he's very electable. I can certainly
understand any reluctance on his part however, or anyone else's for
that matter. You almost have to be a bit insane to consider exposing
yourself to today's politics by mass media character assassination.
It doesn't bode well for the long term viability of our democracy in
my opinion.


It's amazing to me how much it has deteriorated in a somewhat short
period of time. Thinking back, Nixon vs Kennedy and up to Bush number
1 vs Clinton were reasonably civil and mutually respectful campaigns.
I think it turned south shortly thereafter.

I think the Internet and ability for many to express opinions and the
advent of politically biased cable TV networks have contributed greatly
to the decline of respectful political views and character assassination.


===

Yes, and we also have conventional media outlets who make no secret of
their political bias.

So how do we fix it?


Herculean task but the demand for change has to come from the people.
Refusal to support candidates that engage in over the top smear
campaigns, boycotting the viewing of politically biased news and making
the objections known.

Never happen.


  #27   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Current Mood ...

On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:10:53 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/2/14, 4:27 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2014 3:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 11:58:27 -0500, wrote:

Jeb is pretty sane but I doubt he will run.

===

Too bad because I think he's very electable. I can certainly
understand any reluctance on his part however, or anyone else's for
that matter. You almost have to be a bit insane to consider exposing
yourself to today's politics by mass media character assassination.
It doesn't bode well for the long term viability of our democracy in
my opinion.


It's amazing to me how much it has deteriorated in a somewhat short
period of time. Thinking back, Nixon vs Kennedy and up to Bush number
1 vs Clinton were reasonably civil and mutually respectful campaigns. I
think it turned south shortly thereafter.

I think the Internet and ability for many to express opinions and the
advent of politically biased cable TV networks have contributed greatly
to the decline of respectful political views and character assassination.





Can't even get a half dozen posters to behave decently *here* . You have
expectations for the country at large?


===

Define exactly what you mean by behaving decently. Would you like us
to overlook or ignore every outrageous statement that you make? Would
you like us to overlook or ignore every instance of your past
outrageous behavior? This is like a small town. If you wear out
your welcome it will never be forgotten.
  #28   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,344
Default Current Mood ...

On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:40:55 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:10:53 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/2/14, 4:27 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2014 3:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 11:58:27 -0500, wrote:

Jeb is pretty sane but I doubt he will run.

===

Too bad because I think he's very electable. I can certainly
understand any reluctance on his part however, or anyone else's for
that matter. You almost have to be a bit insane to consider exposing
yourself to today's politics by mass media character assassination.
It doesn't bode well for the long term viability of our democracy in
my opinion.


It's amazing to me how much it has deteriorated in a somewhat short
period of time. Thinking back, Nixon vs Kennedy and up to Bush number
1 vs Clinton were reasonably civil and mutually respectful campaigns. I
think it turned south shortly thereafter.

I think the Internet and ability for many to express opinions and the
advent of politically biased cable TV networks have contributed greatly
to the decline of respectful political views and character assassination.





Can't even get a half dozen posters to behave decently *here* . You have
expectations for the country at large?


===

Define exactly what you mean by behaving decently. Would you like us
to overlook or ignore every outrageous statement that you make? Would
you like us to overlook or ignore every instance of your past
outrageous behavior? This is like a small town. If you wear out
your welcome it will never be forgotten.


I think he would like all of us to become like YKW, agree with everything he says and follow around
like a pup.

  #29   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Current Mood ...

On 2/2/14, 7:21 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:40:55 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:10:53 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/2/14, 4:27 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2014 3:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 11:58:27 -0500, wrote:

Jeb is pretty sane but I doubt he will run.

===

Too bad because I think he's very electable. I can certainly
understand any reluctance on his part however, or anyone else's for
that matter. You almost have to be a bit insane to consider exposing
yourself to today's politics by mass media character assassination.
It doesn't bode well for the long term viability of our democracy in
my opinion.


It's amazing to me how much it has deteriorated in a somewhat short
period of time. Thinking back, Nixon vs Kennedy and up to Bush number
1 vs Clinton were reasonably civil and mutually respectful campaigns. I
think it turned south shortly thereafter.

I think the Internet and ability for many to express opinions and the
advent of politically biased cable TV networks have contributed greatly
to the decline of respectful political views and character assassination.





Can't even get a half dozen posters to behave decently *here* . You have
expectations for the country at large?


===

Define exactly what you mean by behaving decently. Would you like us
to overlook or ignore every outrageous statement that you make? Would
you like us to overlook or ignore every instance of your past
outrageous behavior? This is like a small town. If you wear out
your welcome it will never be forgotten.


I think he would like all of us to become like YKW, agree with everything he says and follow around
like a pup.



That reads like a perfect descriptor of the overzealous righties here
who want everyone to believe as they do on politics and follow their
doctrine like a pup and when they don't, why they'd better watch out.
I'm thankful the overzealous righties here and I disagree on just about
everything political. I'm also thankful all the righties here aren't
overzealous...just most of them.
--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Horrible mood... JohnH[_5_] General 7 October 1st 09 08:36 PM
Horrible mood... nom=de=plume General 0 October 1st 09 02:38 AM
Some Sailing - Mood Music [email protected] General 21 August 29th 09 12:39 AM
Adjusting images for mood and effect Tom Francis - SWSports General 8 December 4th 08 01:52 PM
Current or no current Joe ASA 46 February 4th 04 12:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017