Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/17/2014 10:44 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/17/14, 10:29 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: You introduced the "point" that "Officialdom" has a history of *grossly* understating the levels of pollutants to which the ordinary folks and workers are exposed" .... with no statistics, or proof offered. Your "point" really has nothing to do with the discussion, but rather an attempt to slant the flavor of the discussion. There are tons of examples of instances in which "officialdom" has grossly understated or misrepresented or hidden the impact of its actions in areas "environmental." As of two years ago, for example, the U.S. VA was *still* denying some aspects of the health impact on airplanes crews of Agent Orange used in Vietnam. Has the military resolved PTSD cases in favor of those suffering them? If so, how long has it taken? And in West Virginia, horrific pollution has been taking place for generations, and public and corporate officialdom there many times has been in deep denial and is so to this very day. The Gulf of Mexico rig disaster resulted in the perp corporations lying about the size of the leaks and their impact, and they are still lying. Remember TMI? I had a small subcontract from an NRC contractor to do some copy editing on sections of the recommendations of what to do if it happened again. The contractor was recommending that people in the area leave "in an orderly fashion" in directions to avoid wind blowing from a nuclear site. I kid you not. One of my margin notes said, "What if the wind changes direction?" Never heard back on that one. I don't doubt that coverups have happened and reports of impacts under- reported. I think there's almost always two sides of a story though and the details have to be sorted out. Example: The Agent Orange claims by Vietnam vets can be difficult to determine physically or medically. I've actually been encouraged to file for benefits simply because I "could" have been exposed even though I have no physical or medical indications of such. Again, as much as I hate to admit it, many military claims are bogus, just like many injury claims resulting from a car accident are bogus. To those who truly have been injured or affected, they should receive every financial and/or medical benefit available. But unfortunately too many jump on the bandwagon in pursuit of benefits they don't qualify for. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Refinish Deck Question , for sailboat ,, for spring ,, Paint question | Boat Building | |||
Deck delamination, purchase question, how to do the deal .. question | Boat Building | |||
Newbie Question: 40' Performance Cruiser question (including powerplant) | Cruising | |||
Seamanship Question 2 pts plus bonus question. | ASA |