On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:05:06 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:35:45 -0500, John H.
wrote:

I cannot understand why anyone would deny 'marriage' requests from any two beings.

Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s?

Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return. But,
I understand your point. A 'B' should be able to deduct at least one of each gender. But, should
there be a limit placed on the 'Z's'. What if ....you know....goats, sheep, cows, orangutans..???

Hey, for the Glibitz, it's not a choice, right?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

On 12/23/2013 10:12 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:05:06 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:35:45 -0500, John H.
wrote:

I cannot understand why anyone would deny 'marriage' requests from any two beings.

Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s?

Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return. But,
I understand your point. A 'B' should be able to deduct at least one of each gender. But, should
there be a limit placed on the 'Z's'. What if ....you know....goats, sheep, cows, orangutans..???

Hey, for the Glibitz, it's not a choice, right?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!



You seem to have taken a serious interest in this "goat" thing... Is
there something you are not telling us?

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:25:14 -0500, KC wrote:

On 12/23/2013 10:12 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:05:06 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:35:45 -0500, John H.
wrote:

I cannot understand why anyone would deny 'marriage' requests from any two beings.

Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s?

Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return. But,
I understand your point. A 'B' should be able to deduct at least one of each gender. But, should
there be a limit placed on the 'Z's'. What if ....you know....goats, sheep, cows, orangutans..???

Hey, for the Glibitz, it's not a choice, right?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!



You seem to have taken a serious interest in this "goat" thing... Is
there something you are not telling us?

Hey! I was raised on a farm, you know.

I think if there's going to be an acronym for those with sexual preferences other than heterosexual,
then there should be room for all. That includes zoophiles.

So, Glibitz it is. (GLBTZ)

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s?

Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return

You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever.

True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s?

Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on
her income tax return

You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever.

True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

How about unreconstructed Mormon? More than one spouse.

On 12/24/2013 12:26 AM, Califbill wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s?

Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on
her income tax return

You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever.

True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

How about unreconstructed Mormon? More than one spouse.


Really, not to pick nits.... but they are un-reconstructed Mormons

KC wrote:
On 12/24/2013 12:26 AM, Califbill wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s?

Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on
her income tax return

You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever.

True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

How about unreconstructed Mormon? More than one spouse.


Really, not to pick nits.... but they are un-reconstructed Mormons

I am posting from an ipad, so sometimes I miss type, and too much a pain to
go back.

On 12/24/2013 1:13 AM, Califbill wrote:


I am posting from an ipad, so sometimes I miss type, and too much a pain to
go back.



What newsgroup reader do you use on an iPad?

On 12/24/2013 4:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/24/2013 1:13 AM, Califbill wrote:


I am posting from an ipad, so sometimes I miss type, and too much a
pain to
go back.



What newsgroup reader do you use on an iPad?


Good morning.
User-Agent: NewsTap/4.0.1 (iPad)

--
Americans deserve better.

On 12/24/13, 4:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/24/2013 1:13 AM, Califbill wrote:


I am posting from an ipad, so sometimes I miss type, and too much a
pain to
go back.



What newsgroup reader do you use on an iPad?



An app called "NewsTap" works well on iPhones and of course iPads. I
used it on my iPad when I had one, and I use it now from time to time on
my iPhone. You can read, post, filter. It isn't as convenient as, say,
Thunderbird for "grown up computers," but it is pretty good.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.