On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:25:14 -0500, KC wrote:
On 12/23/2013 10:12 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:05:06 -0500, wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:35:45 -0500, John H.
wrote:
I cannot understand why anyone would deny 'marriage' requests from any two beings.
Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s?
Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return. But,
I understand your point. A 'B' should be able to deduct at least one of each gender. But, should
there be a limit placed on the 'Z's'. What if ....you know....goats, sheep, cows, orangutans..???
Hey, for the Glibitz, it's not a choice, right?
John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!
You seem to have taken a serious interest in this "goat" thing... Is
there something you are not telling us?
Hey! I was raised on a farm, you know.
I think if there's going to be an acronym for those with sexual preferences other than heterosexual,
then there should be room for all. That includes zoophiles.
So, Glibitz it is. (GLBTZ)
John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!