On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:26:06 -0600, Califbill wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s?

Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on
her income tax return

You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever.

True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

How about unreconstructed Mormon? More than one spouse.

I wonder if they can claim them all as 'spouses'.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

In article , says...

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s?

Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return

You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever.

True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

Old habits, Harry editing the content of posts, dies hard if they die at all.

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:04:19 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:10:12 -0500, John H.
wrote:

And how come you keep editing my posts?

Editing?

Yeah, cutting out the good parts!

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

On 12/23/13, 8:24 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:14:38 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:04:19 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:10:12 -0500, John H.
wrote:

And how come you keep editing my posts?

Editing?

Yeah, cutting out the good parts!

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


I try to reduce the clutter by only quoting the parts I an responding
to. I assume everyone already read the original post.



Herring wants everyone to see how clever he...isn't.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

On Sunday, December 22, 2013 9:05:05 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Hope this gives apoplexy... ...to the many haters he

Why do you wish harm on others, Harry? No sense of tolerance?

On Monday, December 23, 2013 5:56:59 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 9:05:05 PM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Hope this gives apoplexy... ...to the many haters he



Why do you wish harm on others, Harry? No sense of tolerance?

Cause he's a ****ING ASSHOLE

On 12/22/2013 9:05 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...to the many haters he

--

I can see it now...thousands of married heterosexual couples in Utah
dumping their spouses so they can marry their same-sex boyfriends or
girlfriends. Gays ringing the doorbells in Salt Lake City and breaking
up heterosexual marriages.

You have quite an imagination!

On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:09:37 -0600, amdx wrote:

On 12/22/2013 9:05 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...to the many haters he

--

I can see it now...thousands of married heterosexual couples in Utah
dumping their spouses so they can marry their same-sex boyfriends or
girlfriends. Gays ringing the doorbells in Salt Lake City and breaking
up heterosexual marriages.

You have quite an imagination!

I expect he's somewhat ****ed that he got married well before Maryland passed the gay marriage law.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

On 12/25/13, 12:09 PM, amdx wrote:
On 12/22/2013 9:05 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...to the many haters he

--

I can see it now...thousands of married heterosexual couples in Utah
dumping their spouses so they can marry their same-sex boyfriends or
girlfriends. Gays ringing the doorbells in Salt Lake City and breaking
up heterosexual marriages.

You have quite an imagination!



Well, I do, but...most of us who are unconcerned about gay marriage like
to poke a little fun at those who are against, and many times their
stated reason is that legal gay marriage will somehow ruin "straight
marriage." *How* that would be accomplished is unknown, so, for fun, we
imagine straights dumping their spouses so they can enter into a gay
marriage. But I suppose in Utah if multiple spouses are allowed, you
could have both a straight and a gay partner.

Hey, it gets boring to only poke fun at the other mindless right-wing
group...the teabaggers.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:11:26 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 11:44:31 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

But I suppose in Utah if multiple spouses are allowed, you
could have both a straight and a gay partner.

Hence the "B" in the acronym

It would seem that the 'B' would detract from the 'born gay' theory. I also saw a lady interviewed
on Oprah a while back that stated she liked men, for a while, and then women, for a while. She'd go
back and forth. That also seemed to detract from the 'born gay' theory.

Hope you're having a great day!