Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 1445674800406409914.771138bmckeenospam-
, says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 1104217080406400135.015087bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:44:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/17/13, 10:42 AM, wrote: On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:03:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Do you feel the same about the requirement to have a license to drive? That is mostly about revenue for the state, along with tags. Bull****. What are tags for if it isn't just the tax stamp? If it was really about identifying the cars there would not be thousands of designs, making the state of origin virtually impossible to determine. I never asked a word about "tags". If the license itself was any kind of actual qualification document the test would not be as superficial as it is and there would be ongoing re certification. My mother received a new license after she was dead, simply because she mailed in the check on her way to the hospital. The last time anyone actually evaluated her driving ability was that quick trip around the block and parking the car that passes for a test. My grandfather died in 1998 with a valid driver's license in his wallet and he took the only test he ever had to take in a brand new 1919 Chandler. He had been driving for years but the company made all of their drivers get licensed. Okay, let's do away with tags, and driver's licenses. Someone rear ends you, they just leave, no harm no foul, right? They hit run you, and you get there plate number. Still hard to prove they hit you legally. Oh, horse****!!! Have someone hit and run you on a California freeway, and find out the answer. You simply call the cops, give them the license number, they go find the car, see the damage, done. Been there done that. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
iBoaterer wrote:
In article 1445674800406409914.771138bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 1104217080406400135.015087bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:44:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/17/13, 10:42 AM, wrote: On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:03:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Do you feel the same about the requirement to have a license to drive? That is mostly about revenue for the state, along with tags. Bull****. What are tags for if it isn't just the tax stamp? If it was really about identifying the cars there would not be thousands of designs, making the state of origin virtually impossible to determine. I never asked a word about "tags". If the license itself was any kind of actual qualification document the test would not be as superficial as it is and there would be ongoing re certification. My mother received a new license after she was dead, simply because she mailed in the check on her way to the hospital. The last time anyone actually evaluated her driving ability was that quick trip around the block and parking the car that passes for a test. My grandfather died in 1998 with a valid driver's license in his wallet and he took the only test he ever had to take in a brand new 1919 Chandler. He had been driving for years but the company made all of their drivers get licensed. Okay, let's do away with tags, and driver's licenses. Someone rear ends you, they just leave, no harm no foul, right? They hit run you, and you get there plate number. Still hard to prove they hit you legally. Oh, horse****!!! Have someone hit and run you on a California freeway, and find out the answer. You simply call the cops, give them the license number, they go find the car, see the damage, done. Been there done that. Car not at home. What now? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Speaking of guns | General | |||
Lock up those horses... | General | |||
Speaking of guns .. | General | |||
White Horses | Touring | |||
White Horses | UK Paddle |