On 11/13/13, 1:22 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 11/13/2013 12:09 PM, Califbill wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:11:25 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:21:20 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
The permit is issued yearly based on an inspection of the stables,
barn,
and grounds by the animal control inspector. She checks to ensure
sanitary and safe conditions for both the horse(s) and that may
visit in
the barn area.
Is that any different than home inspections for the safe storage of
firearms?
===
Yes, big difference, unless your stable is also your dwelling.
Inspecting the interior of a home except at the time of construction
or renovation generally requires a search warrant and probable cause,
and that's the way it should stay unless you want to roll the clock
back to colonial times and British rule. It's another example of
northeastern nanny state mentality run amok.
Yeah, what he said.
John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!
It's the GOP that doesn't want progress.....
Progress? Maybe all progress is not good. Illegal search was very
important to the Founders of this country.
Really, when did "progress" start to mean, go back 400 years???
Wow...you really did skip through a lot of school.
2013 - 1776 = 237 years.
And, actually, "progress" goes back to the beginning, either 6,000 years
ago if you are a stuporstitious bible-thumper, or much much farther if
you are not.
You know what progress is, right? It's the opposite of what you believe:
regress.
--
Religion: together we can find the cure.