|
When stand your ground is justified, period.
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 11:32:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:20:22 -0400, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:23:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Zimmerman confronted him? Cite? John (Gun Nut) H. Do you even READ??? From the trial: "While Zimmerman was on the phone with a police dispatcher, he began following Trayvon. Soon after, the dispatcher told Zimmerman it was not necessary for him to pursue the teen." Following is not confronting, in fact it is exactly the opposite. That's the stupidist comment I have read in a very long time. Tell me, what is "Stalking?" He who fights And runs away Lives to fight Another day. Speaking of stupid... You did make a good point however. If Martin had run away, he'd be alive to confront another day. John (Gun Nut) H. WAIT!!!! Why would Martin have to run away, if as you claim, he wasn't confronted???? Wasn't he faster than a speeding bullet? Also, I didn't say he wasn't confronted. You falsely said Zimmerman confronted him. I asked for the cite. You couldn't provide it. You changed the subject. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
When stand your ground is justified, period.
|
When stand your ground is justified, period.
On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 19:10:38 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 17:11:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Cite where he didn't The phone conversation. "Why are you following me" sounds like a confrontation I'm still waiting for his 'cite' that Zimmerman 'confronted' Martin. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
When stand your ground is justified, period.
|
When stand your ground is justified, period.
In article ,
says... On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:33:22 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 17:11:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Cite where he didn't The phone conversation. "Why are you following me" sounds like a confrontation It sure does! That means that Zimmerman was indeed close enough to have a conversation, that would be Zimmerman confronting Martin, thanks for making my point. Zimmerman said Martin came up to him. And of course, you automatically 100% believe that, even after the phone conversation..... In fact, if he really thought he was initiating a confrontation, wouldn't he have been more prepared to draw his gun? He was. This actually makes perfect sense, unlike the FOX rhetoric: http://tinyurl.com/ptadzn2 |
When stand your ground is justified, period.
In article ,
says... On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:33:53 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 19:10:38 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 17:11:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Cite where he didn't The phone conversation. "Why are you following me" sounds like a confrontation I'm still waiting for his 'cite' that Zimmerman 'confronted' Martin. John (Gun Nut) H. The phone conversation. Again. Can you not read or is it that you are too senile to comprehend a sentence? The phone conversation backs up Zimmerman's story. How? |
When stand your ground is justified, period.
On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:33:22 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 17:11:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Cite where he didn't The phone conversation. "Why are you following me" sounds like a confrontation It sure does! That means that Zimmerman was indeed close enough to have a conversation, that would be Zimmerman confronting Martin, thanks for making my point. Well, if Zimmerman was close enough to Martin, then Martin was also close enough to Zimmerman. That would be Martin confronting Zimmerman. Thanks for making my point. What is the most dense material you can imagine? John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
When stand your ground is justified, period.
In article ,
says... On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 12:40:51 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:33:22 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 17:11:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Cite where he didn't The phone conversation. "Why are you following me" sounds like a confrontation It sure does! That means that Zimmerman was indeed close enough to have a conversation, that would be Zimmerman confronting Martin, thanks for making my point. Zimmerman said Martin came up to him. And of course, you automatically 100% believe that, even after the phone conversation..... Because of the conversation In fact, if he really thought he was initiating a confrontation, wouldn't he have been more prepared to draw his gun? He was. This actually makes perfect sense, unlike the FOX rhetoric: http://tinyurl.com/ptadzn2 That all assumes Zimmerman did confront Martin but nothing in his history would suggest that, He was a "creepy assed cracker" because he was skulking around watching martin from a distance. If he had the gun in his hand, the shot would have been fired a lot sooner. Certainly before he was beaten up. If he was flat on his back, getting the **** beat out of him by a kid half his size, as you and FOX maintain, then how did Zimmerman get his gun that was in the small of his back? UNLESS he had it out beforehand. |
When stand your ground is justified, period.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com