On 8/27/13 2:40 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:02:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


And the Russkies and Chinese say to stay out? Sounds like good advice.
Let them reduce their population without USA help. Neither side is our
friend.



It's that humanitarian approach in you pro-fetus types I find so
enlightening.

Replacing a Hamas backed Assad with an Al Qeada based radical muslim
government is a tumor transplant at best.



I'm curious: do you or "the others" see something in my post about
humanitarianism that calls for any sort of military action? I don't.
What I was commenting upon was the freeper's comment about "reducing
population" and how that comment was not humanitarian. Why would I want
to support an idea that calls for massive deaths on both sides?

Abstract thinking, an ability in short supply in rec.boats.

On 8/27/2013 2:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/27/13 12:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/27/13 11:53 AM, Califbill wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:01:32 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:29:25 -0400, John H
wrote:

http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN/

John (Gun Nut) H.

Oh ****, another WMD war.

Is he going to find them?

Carney says that Kerry says that more info is coming in the next few
days. I'll tell you, this sure
sounds much like the Bush administration's rationale and reasoning. But,
this time the Syrian leader
is not threatening the USA - unless we take action.

John (Gun Nut) H.

And the Russkies and Chinese say to stay out? Sounds like good advice.
Let them reduce their population without USA help. Neither side is our
friend.



It's that humanitarian approach in you pro-fetus types I find so enlightening.

I am humanitarian. Keep our soldiers healthy and safe. Why send our kids
over where neither side wants them. Also, what happens when we attack a
country that did not attack us? Seems as they then have a right to attack
us. More 9/11's?


I was referring to your comment about letting both sides in Syria "reduce
their population without USA help." *That* is not a humanitarian comment.

They seem to be a bang up job of reducing their population now. Why should
we get involved? Maybe if they had to spend time growing food, instead of
depending on humanitarian aid, they would have less time and materials for
reducing their population via war.


Quote of the day right there...

On 8/27/13 5:29 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/27/2013 2:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/27/13 12:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/27/13 11:53 AM, Califbill wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:01:32 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:29:25 -0400, John H
wrote:

http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN/

John (Gun Nut) H.

Oh ****, another WMD war.

Is he going to find them?

Carney says that Kerry says that more info is coming in the next few
days. I'll tell you, this sure
sounds much like the Bush administration's rationale and
reasoning. But,
this time the Syrian leader
is not threatening the USA - unless we take action.

John (Gun Nut) H.

And the Russkies and Chinese say to stay out? Sounds like good
advice.
Let them reduce their population without USA help. Neither side
is our
friend.



It's that humanitarian approach in you pro-fetus types I find so
enlightening.

I am humanitarian. Keep our soldiers healthy and safe. Why send
our kids
over where neither side wants them. Also, what happens when we
attack a
country that did not attack us? Seems as they then have a right to
attack
us. More 9/11's?


I was referring to your comment about letting both sides in Syria
"reduce
their population without USA help." *That* is not a humanitarian
comment.

They seem to be a bang up job of reducing their population now. Why
should
we get involved? Maybe if they had to spend time growing food,
instead of
depending on humanitarian aid, they would have less time and materials
for
reducing their population via war.


Quote of the day right there...


No question that you and your right-wing moron buddies Herring and
Bilious Bill get woodys over statements that indicate no displeasure
over the situation in Syria.

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


Richard had a proposal I support. I've supported that same sort of
idea
in other places...a massive influx of multinational humanitarian
forces
to take care of the sick, wounded non-combatants, with more than
enough
heavily equipped multinational warriors to take care of any who attack
the humanitarian effort or those seeking it. And by multinational, I
mean the Russians and Chinese, too, along with plenty of fighters from
Muslim countries.

As in, "you morons attack this effort militarily in any way, we'll
slaughter you without quarter."

-----------------------------

It would be interesting to try. Puts Putin in an awkward position
for a change. What's he going to do, threaten military action against
a multinational humanitarian effort? Or veto it in the UN?

On 8/27/2013 4:11 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Do this enough times, and we'll eliminate violent religious and other
sorts of intolerance.

Um, Harry. You are intolerance personified. Do us a favor and eliminate
yourself for the good of mankind.

...."would turn tale"...??
Just what tales would they turn..the Adventures of Peter Pan and TinkerBell?

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/27/13 5:29 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/27/2013 2:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/27/13 12:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/27/13 11:53 AM, Califbill wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:01:32 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:29:25 -0400, John H
wrote:

http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN/

John (Gun Nut) H.

Oh ****, another WMD war.

Is he going to find them?

Carney says that Kerry says that more info is coming in the next few
days. I'll tell you, this sure
sounds much like the Bush administration's rationale and
reasoning. But,
this time the Syrian leader
is not threatening the USA - unless we take action.

John (Gun Nut) H.

And the Russkies and Chinese say to stay out? Sounds like good
advice.
Let them reduce their population without USA help. Neither side
is our
friend.



It's that humanitarian approach in you pro-fetus types I find so
enlightening.

I am humanitarian. Keep our soldiers healthy and safe. Why send
our kids
over where neither side wants them. Also, what happens when we
attack a
country that did not attack us? Seems as they then have a right to
attack
us. More 9/11's?


I was referring to your comment about letting both sides in Syria
"reduce
their population without USA help." *That* is not a humanitarian
comment.

They seem to be a bang up job of reducing their population now. Why
should
we get involved? Maybe if they had to spend time growing food,
instead of
depending on humanitarian aid, they would have less time and materials
for
reducing their population via war.


Quote of the day right there...


No question that you and your right-wing moron buddies Herring and
Bilious Bill get woodys over statements that indicate no displeasure over
the situation in Syria.

I see no pleasure in the Syrian situation. Also Iraq and Afghanistan.
Look what getting involved in those two places as accomplished. You want
to have a 3rd front?

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/27/13 2:40 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:02:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


And the Russkies and Chinese say to stay out? Sounds like good advice.
Let them reduce their population without USA help. Neither side is our
friend.



It's that humanitarian approach in you pro-fetus types I find so
enlightening.

Replacing a Hamas backed Assad with an Al Qeada based radical muslim
government is a tumor transplant at best.



I'm curious: do you or "the others" see something in my post about
humanitarianism that calls for any sort of military action? I don't. What
I was commenting upon was the freeper's comment about "reducing
population" and how that comment was not humanitarian. Why would I want
to support an idea that calls for massive deaths on both sides?

Abstract thinking, an ability in short supply in rec.boats.

Actually that is abstract thinking at it's best. If you can not see it,
you lack abstract-ness. The earth is over populated, and in olden times
disease and war kept the population in bounds. The people in the Middle
East seem to think killing each other is OK. So let them have at it.
Get-r-done.

On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 9:23:17 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
..."would turn tale"...??

Just what tales would they turn..the Adventures of Peter Pan and TinkerBell?

The above comment is why there are some of us who would love to cause mortal injuries to the fat **** of an author that posted them.

On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 9:31:12 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:


Some have the freedom of forming a personal opinion. You don't.

That's the difference.

The above reason that dick.....is a DICKLICKER.