On Monday, June 24, 2013 1:02:32 PM UTC-5, Califbill wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...



On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:35:40 -0700, "Califbill"

wrote:



"John H" wrote in message

.. .



...and my wife, the *real* gun nut, chose this:



http://tinyurl.com/3mbx4ao



She likes it much better. So do I. Gotta give her credit.



John (Gun Nut) H.



Running out of room in the safe.



John (Gun Nut) H.

--



Hope you're having a great day!





---------



Bigger safe.

Two bigger safe's!

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:39:59 -0400, Earl wrote:

John H wrote:
...and my wife, the *real* gun nut, chose this:

http://tinyurl.com/3mbx4ao

She likes it much better. So do I. Gotta give her credit.

John (Gun Nut) H.
I'm looking hard at this one...

http://www.coonaninc.com/index.php/cPath,5

Beautiful gun. You could take on an armored division with it. Why a .357?

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:18:46 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:29:37 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:39:59 -0400, Earl wrote:

John H wrote:
...and my wife, the *real* gun nut, chose this:

http://tinyurl.com/3mbx4ao

She likes it much better. So do I. Gotta give her credit.

John (Gun Nut) H.
I'm looking hard at this one...

http://www.coonaninc.com/index.php/cPath,5

Beautiful gun. You could take on an armored division with it. Why a .357?

John (Gun Nut) H.

.357 gives you a performance advantage over the .45 and 9mm.
10mm/.40 closed that gap.

I know, I've got one, a revolver. I guess if I lived down there I'd want something that'd kill
pythons and boas on the first shot.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

On 6/25/13 11:18 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:29:37 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:39:59 -0400, Earl wrote:

John H wrote:
...and my wife, the *real* gun nut, chose this:

http://tinyurl.com/3mbx4ao

She likes it much better. So do I. Gotta give her credit.

John (Gun Nut) H.
I'm looking hard at this one...

http://www.coonaninc.com/index.php/cPath,5

Beautiful gun. You could take on an armored division with it. Why a .357?

John (Gun Nut) H.

.357 gives you a performance advantage over the .45 and 9mm.
10mm/.40 closed that gap.



A performance advantage? Funny stuff.

Shot a "10" one afternoon at the range. Just bloody awful. Don't like
..40 S&W much, either. Do like the .367 mag in an S&W 27-2.

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 6/25/13 11:18 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:29:37 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:39:59 -0400, Earl wrote:

John H wrote:
...and my wife, the *real* gun nut, chose this:

http://tinyurl.com/3mbx4ao

She likes it much better. So do I. Gotta give her credit.

John (Gun Nut) H.
I'm looking hard at this one...

http://www.coonaninc.com/index.php/cPath,5

Beautiful gun. You could take on an armored division with it. Why a
.357?

John (Gun Nut) H.

.357 gives you a performance advantage over the .45 and 9mm.
10mm/.40 closed that gap.



A performance advantage? Funny stuff.

Shot a "10" one afternoon at the range. Just bloody awful. Don't like
..40 S&W much, either. Do like the .367 mag in an S&W 27-2.

---------------------------------------------

I know very little about comparisons of different kinds of ammo and
even less about how to judge their "performance".
Terms like "stopping power" really don't mean much, IMO, because
there are so many other factors involved.

However, from basic physics, energy equals mass times velocity
squared. Some smart German guy figured that out. So, the velocity
of a round has much more to do with the resultant imparted energy than
the mass of the slug, assuming they are somewhat similar. The table
in the provided link indicates that a typical .357 round has a much
higher muzzle velocity than a typical 45 round. So, if the German
guy is right, the energy on the target is higher with the 357.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...



However, from basic physics, energy equals mass times velocity
squared. Some smart German guy figured that out. So, the velocity
of a round has much more to do with the resultant imparted energy than
the mass of the slug, assuming they are somewhat similar. The table
in the provided link indicates that a typical .357 round has a much
higher muzzle velocity than a typical 45 round. So, if the German
guy is right, the energy on the target is higher with the 357.

---------------------------------

Woops. forgot the link:

http://www.chuckhawks.com/handgun_trajectory_table.htm

On 6/25/13 1:26 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 6/25/13 11:18 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:29:37 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:39:59 -0400, Earl wrote:

John H wrote:
...and my wife, the *real* gun nut, chose this:

http://tinyurl.com/3mbx4ao

She likes it much better. So do I. Gotta give her credit.

John (Gun Nut) H.
I'm looking hard at this one...

http://www.coonaninc.com/index.php/cPath,5

Beautiful gun. You could take on an armored division with it. Why a
.357?

John (Gun Nut) H.

.357 gives you a performance advantage over the .45 and 9mm.
10mm/.40 closed that gap.



A performance advantage? Funny stuff.

Shot a "10" one afternoon at the range. Just bloody awful. Don't like
.40 S&W much, either. Do like the .367 mag in an S&W 27-2.

---------------------------------------------

I know very little about comparisons of different kinds of ammo and even
less about how to judge their "performance".
Terms like "stopping power" really don't mean much, IMO, because there
are so many other factors involved.

However, from basic physics, energy equals mass times velocity
squared. Some smart German guy figured that out. So, the velocity of
a round has much more to do with the resultant imparted energy than the
mass of the slug, assuming they are somewhat similar. The table in the
provided link indicates that a typical .357 round has a much higher
muzzle velocity than a typical 45 round. So, if the German guy is
right, the energy on the target is higher with the 357.




Oh, I am aware of the different properties of some different rounds, but
in shooting paper targets at a typical range distance, it doesn't matter
much to me. Perhaps the original poster is talking about the ability to
pierce and destroy flesh?

In article ,
says...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...



However, from basic physics, energy equals mass times velocity
squared. Some smart German guy figured that out. So, the velocity
of a round has much more to do with the resultant imparted energy than
the mass of the slug, assuming they are somewhat similar. The table
in the provided link indicates that a typical .357 round has a much
higher muzzle velocity than a typical 45 round. So, if the German
guy is right, the energy on the target is higher with the 357.

---------------------------------

Woops. forgot the link:

http://www.chuckhawks.com/handgun_trajectory_table.htm

Physics don't apply in Harryworld.....

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:46:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 6/25/13 1:26 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 6/25/13 11:18 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:29:37 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:39:59 -0400, Earl wrote:

John H wrote:
...and my wife, the *real* gun nut, chose this:

http://tinyurl.com/3mbx4ao

She likes it much better. So do I. Gotta give her credit.

John (Gun Nut) H.
I'm looking hard at this one...

http://www.coonaninc.com/index.php/cPath,5

Beautiful gun. You could take on an armored division with it. Why a
.357?

John (Gun Nut) H.

.357 gives you a performance advantage over the .45 and 9mm.
10mm/.40 closed that gap.



A performance advantage? Funny stuff.

Shot a "10" one afternoon at the range. Just bloody awful. Don't like
.40 S&W much, either. Do like the .367 mag in an S&W 27-2.

---------------------------------------------

I know very little about comparisons of different kinds of ammo and even
less about how to judge their "performance".
Terms like "stopping power" really don't mean much, IMO, because there
are so many other factors involved.

However, from basic physics, energy equals mass times velocity
squared. Some smart German guy figured that out. So, the velocity of
a round has much more to do with the resultant imparted energy than the
mass of the slug, assuming they are somewhat similar. The table in the
provided link indicates that a typical .357 round has a much higher
muzzle velocity than a typical 45 round. So, if the German guy is
right, the energy on the target is higher with the 357.




Oh, I am aware of the different properties of some different rounds, but
in shooting paper targets at a typical range distance, it doesn't matter
much to me. Perhaps the original poster is talking about the ability to
pierce and destroy flesh?

Why shoot anything bigger than a .22, if your goal is only to put targets in paper?

Why sell the cheap 9mm and buy a .45? Are you thinking of destroying flesh, or just putting pencil
sized holes in paper?

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

On 6/25/2013 2:54 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:46:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 6/25/13 1:26 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 6/25/13 11:18 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:29:37 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:39:59 -0400, Earl wrote:

John H wrote:
...and my wife, the *real* gun nut, chose this:

http://tinyurl.com/3mbx4ao

She likes it much better. So do I. Gotta give her credit.

John (Gun Nut) H.
I'm looking hard at this one...

http://www.coonaninc.com/index.php/cPath,5

Beautiful gun. You could take on an armored division with it. Why a
.357?

John (Gun Nut) H.

.357 gives you a performance advantage over the .45 and 9mm.
10mm/.40 closed that gap.



A performance advantage? Funny stuff.

Shot a "10" one afternoon at the range. Just bloody awful. Don't like
.40 S&W much, either. Do like the .367 mag in an S&W 27-2.

---------------------------------------------

I know very little about comparisons of different kinds of ammo and even
less about how to judge their "performance".
Terms like "stopping power" really don't mean much, IMO, because there
are so many other factors involved.

However, from basic physics, energy equals mass times velocity
squared. Some smart German guy figured that out. So, the velocity of
a round has much more to do with the resultant imparted energy than the
mass of the slug, assuming they are somewhat similar. The table in the
provided link indicates that a typical .357 round has a much higher
muzzle velocity than a typical 45 round. So, if the German guy is
right, the energy on the target is higher with the 357.




Oh, I am aware of the different properties of some different rounds, but
in shooting paper targets at a typical range distance, it doesn't matter
much to me. Perhaps the original poster is talking about the ability to
pierce and destroy flesh?

Why shoot anything bigger than a .22, if your goal is only to put targets in paper?

Why sell the cheap 9mm and buy a .45? Are you thinking of destroying flesh, or just putting pencil
sized holes in paper?

John (Gun Nut) H.


Interesting question. I'm looking forward to hearing his answer.