About Us

BAR[_2_]

In article , says...

"Boating All Out" wrote in message
...

In article be98ef1d-78b5-4422-9810-4de11b3642d5
@googlegroups.com, says...

Maybe you missed it, but the majority has already

regulated and banned guns. That's why it's working for

them.

You must have missed it, but it's NOT working for them. Making more
laws doesn't work. The criminals are already breaking the law,
what's one more law to them?

It's funny how you are so adamant about how people aren't going to
teach *your* children about guns, then you let it slip that you
"children" are actually adults.
Seems that you don't actually have a dog in this hunt,
other than to promote your particular political agenda.
You should probably let people that actually have kids
decide, not some old fart with an unrealistic view of
the world like yourself.

Have a nice day.

You still don't get it. The majority are happy enough
with current gun regulations/bans. Otherwise there will
be more regulations/bans, not less. That's been the
course of history, more regulations and bans, with some
exceptions in some states. It's not been teaching "gun
safety" in public schools. Since you seem to be a gun
nut worried about criminals, and want all children taught
"gun safety" in public schools, I'll tell you what I told
the others.
You want "gun safety" safety courses taught in public
schools, then ****ing work for it. Good luck.
In the meantime, I don't give a **** if you mortgage your
house to lawfully load it up with guns to defend yourself
against criminals. None of my business.
Nobody's stopping you, and I couldn't care less how you
defend your little castle.
I have grandkids in public schools, and my children feel
the same way about this for their kids. So that argument
doesn't work, unless you say I shouldn't care about kin.
Now, I've got no problem with anybody taking their
youngsters to the range or woods and teaching them
whatever they want about guns.
Why are you gun nuts asking taxpayers to shoulder your
responsibility in training your kids skills the majority
of people feel are unnecessary or undesirable for their
kids?
That's what I've noticed about gun nuts. Always wanting
to tell other people how their lives should be conducted
around guns.
They're always right. They just can't ken to the fact
that the majority of people have nothing to do with guns.
Here I am saying I'm fine with them legally loading up
with all the guns they want. That's not enough for them.
They want to tell others how to raise their kids.
Now there's plenty of gun-owners who don't do this, and
just go about their business.
Then you got your gun nuts.
Saying I have a "political agenda." Thinking that "gun
safety" classes in public schools hasn't already been
decided, and what they think is right should just be
implemented despite majority opposition. Saying my very
real and fairly long life has been "unrealistic" despite
it working out just fine.
Go figure.

------------------------------------

Take a deep breath and relax.

Nobody is advocating gun safety classes on your dime or anyone else's.
There are plenty of qualified "gun nuts", including law enforcement
personnel who would be more than willing to make safety presentations
at a school or other extracurricular activity. And again, it's not
to teach youth about how to become proficient in the *use* a gun.
It's to educate them as to the dangers of firearms and their safe
handling should they come in the presence of one. I can see it as a
special event, much like field trips, in which participation is
voluntary and with the permission of the parents for their kid to
attend.

They advocated and force sex educaiton classes on each of our dimes.

Eisboch[_8_]

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..

In article ,
says...

"Boating All Out" wrote in message
...

(rant snipped for brevity)
------------------------------------

Take a deep breath and relax.

Nobody is advocating gun safety classes on your dime or anyone
else's.
There are plenty of qualified "gun nuts", including law enforcement
personnel who would be more than willing to make safety
presentations
at a school or other extracurricular activity. And again, it's not
to teach youth about how to become proficient in the *use* a gun.
It's to educate them as to the dangers of firearms and their safe
handling should they come in the presence of one. I can see it as
a
special event, much like field trips, in which participation is
voluntary and with the permission of the parents for their kid to
attend.

They advocated and force sex educaiton classes on each of our dimes.

-------------------------------------------------------

There has been some form of sex education in schools since I was in
junior high school .... and that's a long time ago.

I think gun safety is a little more controversial and I can see why
some people would object. There's obviously much debate going on
about what to do to reduce the number of accidental deaths and
injuries with strong feelings across the board regarding the subject.
All I was doing was putting an idea on the table for discussion since
so many are frustrated that nothing is being done and the only answer
to some is to ban guns altogether. That's not going to happen anytime
in the near or distant future, so we should be talking about what
*can* be done that does not impose hardships on anyone or take away
their right to gun ownership.

BAR[_2_]

In article , says...

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..

In article ,
says...

"Boating All Out" wrote in message
...

(rant snipped for brevity)
------------------------------------

Take a deep breath and relax.

Nobody is advocating gun safety classes on your dime or anyone
else's.
There are plenty of qualified "gun nuts", including law enforcement
personnel who would be more than willing to make safety
presentations
at a school or other extracurricular activity. And again, it's not
to teach youth about how to become proficient in the *use* a gun.
It's to educate them as to the dangers of firearms and their safe
handling should they come in the presence of one. I can see it as
a
special event, much like field trips, in which participation is
voluntary and with the permission of the parents for their kid to
attend.

They advocated and force sex educaiton classes on each of our dimes.

-------------------------------------------------------

There has been some form of sex education in schools since I was in
junior high school .... and that's a long time ago.

High schools used to have rifle shooting teams. They have never had ****ing teams, to the
best of my knowledge.

I think gun safety is a little more controversial and I can see why
some people would object. There's obviously much debate going on
about what to do to reduce the number of accidental deaths and
injuries with strong feelings across the board regarding the subject.
All I was doing was putting an idea on the table for discussion since
so many are frustrated that nothing is being done and the only answer
to some is to ban guns altogether. That's not going to happen anytime
in the near or distant future, so we should be talking about what
*can* be done that does not impose hardships on anyone or take away
their right to gun ownership.

People use to get run over and killed by horse horse drawn chariots.

People who want to do harm to others are going to do harm to others with whatever tool is
convienent at the time. That tool may be a gun, a stick, a frying pan or someother implement.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
OT Air Show	Scott Dickson	General	0	June 22nd 09 12:42 AM
ot dog show..	[email protected]	General	9	February 14th 08 04:16 AM
Name that TV Show...	Short Wave Sportfishing	General	29	December 10th 07 02:01 PM
Another no-show for Bob	Scotty	ASA	1	January 30th 06 10:47 PM

Menu

About Us