On 6/17/2013 2:07 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 6/17/2013 9:40 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 6/17/2013 9:26 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 6/17/2013 8:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:



I just don't believe your claims. Either that or your accusations
regarding the teacher involved were groundless.



Several years ago when I went through it all, it was well documented
here... Take it for what it's worth. "You" are not going to go into the
school and change anybody...

-----------------------------------------

Sorry but I don't recall you "documenting" anything here about this or
any other subject. Maybe you did. I just don't remember it.

But, if, as you state, you brought the issue up to "the Department of
Children", the cops, school officials, lawyers and the state Attorney
General and they all ignored you, maybe you should consider what or who
the common denominator was.



Oh, and plonk

You just plonked one of the very few sane rec.boaters.

Oh well, my loss I guess He doesn't respect anything I say anyway, and
he is only here for the fights.. I am not interested in that kind of
"sanity"... thanks.

In article ,
says...

On 6/17/2013 2:07 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 6/17/2013 9:40 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 6/17/2013 9:26 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 6/17/2013 8:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:



I just don't believe your claims. Either that or your accusations
regarding the teacher involved were groundless.



Several years ago when I went through it all, it was well documented
here... Take it for what it's worth. "You" are not going to go into the
school and change anybody...

-----------------------------------------

Sorry but I don't recall you "documenting" anything here about this or
any other subject. Maybe you did. I just don't remember it.

But, if, as you state, you brought the issue up to "the Department of
Children", the cops, school officials, lawyers and the state Attorney
General and they all ignored you, maybe you should consider what or who
the common denominator was.



Oh, and plonk

You just plonked one of the very few sane rec.boaters.

Oh well, my loss I guess He doesn't respect anything I say anyway, and
he is only here for the fights.. I am not interested in that kind of
"sanity"... thanks.

Of course you're not interested in sanity, you've proven that!!!

"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 6/17/2013 9:40 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

Oh, and plonk

You just plonked one of the very few sane rec.boaters.

---------------------------------------

Not sure about the "sane" part, but being plonked by Scott is probably
for the better. He can't handle criticism of anything he says and
somehow twists things around to interpret any criticism as being
directed towards his kids or wife or someone other than him. I got a
kick out of that. The comments I made about him appealing to his list
of people including his state Attorney General regarding a teacher
pushing a personal political agenda had nothing to do with his kids.
It had everything to do about *him*.

BTW ... sending a strongly worded e-mail to the Attorney General's
office really doesn't count. I'd be more interested in what the
lawyer he claims that he contacted (but did nothing) had to say.

On 6/17/13 2:36 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 6/17/2013 9:40 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

Oh, and plonk

You just plonked one of the very few sane rec.boaters.

---------------------------------------

Not sure about the "sane" part, but being plonked by Scott is probably
for the better. He can't handle criticism of anything he says and
somehow twists things around to interpret any criticism as being
directed towards his kids or wife or someone other than him. I got a
kick out of that. The comments I made about him appealing to his list
of people including his state Attorney General regarding a teacher
pushing a personal political agenda had nothing to do with his kids. It
had everything to do about *him*.

BTW ... sending a strongly worded e-mail to the Attorney General's
office really doesn't count. I'd be more interested in what the lawyer
he claims that he contacted (but did nothing) had to say.


"My retainer is $2500."

So did Richard A week ago.
What's your point?

On 6/17/2013 3:18 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 6/17/13 2:36 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 6/17/2013 9:40 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

Oh, and plonk

You just plonked one of the very few sane rec.boaters.

---------------------------------------

Not sure about the "sane" part, but being plonked by Scott is probably
for the better. He can't handle criticism of anything he says and
somehow twists things around to interpret any criticism as being
directed towards his kids or wife or someone other than him. I got a
kick out of that. The comments I made about him appealing to his list
of people including his state Attorney General regarding a teacher
pushing a personal political agenda had nothing to do with his kids. It
had everything to do about *him*.

BTW ... sending a strongly worded e-mail to the Attorney General's
office really doesn't count. I'd be more interested in what the lawyer
he claims that he contacted (but did nothing) had to say.


"My retainer is $2500."

Aren't you kind of old to be worrying about straightening your teeth? ;-)

On Monday, 17 June 2013 16:25:22 UTC-3, True North wrote:
So did Richard A week ago.

What's your point?

ooops..this was from my Playbook and in response to 'Hank's' comment about plonking one of the few sane people.

"True North" wrote in message
...

On Monday, 17 June 2013 16:25:22 UTC-3, True North wrote:
So did Richard A week ago.

What's your point?

ooops..this was from my Playbook and in response to 'Hank's' comment
about plonking one of the few sane people.

-------------------------------------------

I released everyone from my Bozo bin. Well, almost everyone. That
nutcake slammer went back after seeing a couple of his posts.
Why do people bother responding to him? He's obviously mentally
disturbed and responds to any attention afforded him.

I don't like putting anyone in the Bozo bin. The world is full of
differences of opinion and there's nothing wrong with having vigorous
debates.
But when they reduce to endless rounds of escalating name calling and
the " I know you are, but what am I?" mentality, it gets old real
fast.

On 6/17/13 7:14 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"True North" wrote in message
...

On Monday, 17 June 2013 16:25:22 UTC-3, True North wrote:
So did Richard A week ago.

What's your point?

ooops..this was from my Playbook and in response to 'Hank's' comment
about plonking one of the few sane people.

-------------------------------------------

I released everyone from my Bozo bin. Well, almost everyone. That
nutcake slammer went back after seeing a couple of his posts.
Why do people bother responding to him? He's obviously mentally
disturbed and responds to any attention afforded him.

I don't like putting anyone in the Bozo bin. The world is full of
differences of opinion and there's nothing wrong with having vigorous
debates.
But when they reduce to endless rounds of escalating name calling and
the " I know you are, but what am I?" mentality, it gets old real fast.


Which is why Herring is back down there, along with your buddy FlaJim,
earl, etc., and a couple of others, because, really, all they ever seem
to do here is post insults.

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 6/17/13 7:14 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"True North" wrote in message
...

On Monday, 17 June 2013 16:25:22 UTC-3, True North wrote:
So did Richard A week ago.

What's your point?

ooops..this was from my Playbook and in response to 'Hank's' comment
about plonking one of the few sane people.

-------------------------------------------

I released everyone from my Bozo bin. Well, almost everyone. That
nutcake slammer went back after seeing a couple of his posts.
Why do people bother responding to him? He's obviously mentally
disturbed and responds to any attention afforded him.

I don't like putting anyone in the Bozo bin. The world is full of
differences of opinion and there's nothing wrong with having
vigorous
debates.
But when they reduce to endless rounds of escalating name calling
and
the " I know you are, but what am I?" mentality, it gets old real
fast.


Which is why Herring is back down there, along with your buddy FlaJim,
earl, etc., and a couple of others, because, really, all they ever
seem
to do here is post insults.

-----------------------------------------

I see FlaJim's posts. As you suspect, they are often directed at you.
But, I don't see them as being excessively inflammatory compared to
some of the other exchanges that have taken place here. In fact,
many of his comments are humorous. Somewhat reminiscent of the old
Skipper of years past.
Not the same, but similar.

You're no angel either, nor am I.