Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article m,
says... On 6/13/2013 7:21 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:57:41 -0700, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 12:55:23 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:23:56 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:58:23 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:19:00 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:02:21 -0700, jps wrote: Ten people were hurt You understand you are the only troll here for about a week. Take it somewhere else. And miss out on all the fine posts about trailers and trucks? **** no, this is my home sweet home. ==== Trailers and trucks are at least related to towing boats which is a common and on-topic issue. Your anti gun screeds however are not, and this is most definitely not your home. Oh but it is Wayne. Just as much as it is yours. Boats and guns go together like beans and rice. I need a gun to protect my boat. Maybe lay off until the gun nuts start talking about their guns again. I suspect their gun talk offends you, and I'll tell you it offends me. I find all guns offensive unless it's mine. Talking about them in a public forum not meant for that sort of discussion is akin to talking about your masturbation habits. Gun nuts don't understand that, because they're gun nuts. An exception here would be an anti-pirate gun kept on the boat, for those who travel in pirate waters. Those bringing that up will be quickly told that pirates have more and bigger guns, so you'll probably just increase your chance of getting yourself killed. Of course the NRA would contest that, and say that simply having more guns aboard to equip everybody in your family/crew/squad is how it should be done to ward off the "bad guys." Maybe another "exception" would be an anti- shark gun kept on the boat, to which the answer would be don't swim with sharks, and don't shoot at sharks circling a swimmer. You might kill the swimmer, and if you blood the shark, you'll just attract more....sharks. I have no real problem ignoring the gun threads too often started here. I usually only respond when I feel like calling gun nuts trash, which is as it should be. They fully deserve it. I don't know why these guys get on your case for reporting news. They can ignore your posts. They don't. Their problem. But you might lay off until they start another of their gun jack off sessions, to see how long that lasts. Hypocrisy and faulty logic should be called out. So give them a chance to show it again. Makes for a more balanced circle of nonsense. If they want to talk about boats, nobody's stopping them. The news makes 'em feel bad about their love of guns. I don't mind those who own guns responsibly and I suspect the gun nuts in rec.boats are responsible. What irks the **** out of me is when responsible owners start talking about gun rights. As if they were more important than any other right, including safety of the general population from an over abundance of guns that make it out into the streets and promote violence and easy answers to hard problems. These jerks would give up all their rights to privacy, search and seizure, free speech and whatever else as long as they can keep there little dick extensions. Meanwhile, the country's kids are at risk from idiots who can't manage to keep their guns locked up. Are all gun owners 'gun nuts'? Why should not responsible owners have a desire to own their guns? As to 'privacy, search and seizure, free speech and whatever else', it seems the folks currently in power are doing their best to stomp on those rights also - or have you not noticed? Do female gun owners also worry about 'there' (sic) dick extensions? Meanwhile the country's kids are at risk from assholes who can't resist texting while driving. John H. At least one person here is seeing the light that JPS is shining. He's offloading his guns and ammo. Whatever floats your boat. Oops! He just upgraded to a bigger caliber and a carry your brass out of the area option rather than having it fly all over the place. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/13/2013 6:41 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m, says... On 6/13/2013 7:21 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:57:41 -0700, jps wrote: On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 12:55:23 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:23:56 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:58:23 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:19:00 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:02:21 -0700, jps wrote: Ten people were hurt You understand you are the only troll here for about a week. Take it somewhere else. And miss out on all the fine posts about trailers and trucks? **** no, this is my home sweet home. ==== Trailers and trucks are at least related to towing boats which is a common and on-topic issue. Your anti gun screeds however are not, and this is most definitely not your home. Oh but it is Wayne. Just as much as it is yours. Boats and guns go together like beans and rice. I need a gun to protect my boat. Maybe lay off until the gun nuts start talking about their guns again. I suspect their gun talk offends you, and I'll tell you it offends me. I find all guns offensive unless it's mine. Talking about them in a public forum not meant for that sort of discussion is akin to talking about your masturbation habits. Gun nuts don't understand that, because they're gun nuts. An exception here would be an anti-pirate gun kept on the boat, for those who travel in pirate waters. Those bringing that up will be quickly told that pirates have more and bigger guns, so you'll probably just increase your chance of getting yourself killed. Of course the NRA would contest that, and say that simply having more guns aboard to equip everybody in your family/crew/squad is how it should be done to ward off the "bad guys." Maybe another "exception" would be an anti- shark gun kept on the boat, to which the answer would be don't swim with sharks, and don't shoot at sharks circling a swimmer. You might kill the swimmer, and if you blood the shark, you'll just attract more....sharks. I have no real problem ignoring the gun threads too often started here. I usually only respond when I feel like calling gun nuts trash, which is as it should be. They fully deserve it. I don't know why these guys get on your case for reporting news. They can ignore your posts. They don't. Their problem. But you might lay off until they start another of their gun jack off sessions, to see how long that lasts. Hypocrisy and faulty logic should be called out. So give them a chance to show it again. Makes for a more balanced circle of nonsense. If they want to talk about boats, nobody's stopping them. The news makes 'em feel bad about their love of guns. I don't mind those who own guns responsibly and I suspect the gun nuts in rec.boats are responsible. What irks the **** out of me is when responsible owners start talking about gun rights. As if they were more important than any other right, including safety of the general population from an over abundance of guns that make it out into the streets and promote violence and easy answers to hard problems. These jerks would give up all their rights to privacy, search and seizure, free speech and whatever else as long as they can keep there little dick extensions. Meanwhile, the country's kids are at risk from idiots who can't manage to keep their guns locked up. Are all gun owners 'gun nuts'? Why should not responsible owners have a desire to own their guns? As to 'privacy, search and seizure, free speech and whatever else', it seems the folks currently in power are doing their best to stomp on those rights also - or have you not noticed? Do female gun owners also worry about 'there' (sic) dick extensions? Meanwhile the country's kids are at risk from assholes who can't resist texting while driving. John H. At least one person here is seeing the light that JPS is shining. He's offloading his guns and ammo. Whatever floats your boat. Oops! He just upgraded to a bigger caliber and a carry your brass out of the area option rather than having it fly all over the place. More of a big game gun if you ask me. I doubt if many people would consider it a legitimate target pistol. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Air Show | General | |||
ot dog show.. | General | |||
Name that TV Show... | General | |||
Another no-show for Bob | ASA |