BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   If you thought... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/154562-if-you-thought.html)

iBoaterer[_2_] January 12th 13 05:47 PM

If you thought...
 
In article , says...

On 1/12/2013 11:03 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:47:32 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/12/13 10:43 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:29:23 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/12/13 10:30 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:05:30 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/12/13 9:59 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:54:12 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.

"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?

"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."

is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?

" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."

James 2:14-17

What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.

Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.

Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."

That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.

Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.

Cite?

http://tinyurl.com/o42at


Here you go, ignorant asshole:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion

'Evangelical missionaries' are not mentioned once. So from where came your bull****, ESAD?

Are you channeling iLoogy?


Are you unable to prove your bull****?

Salmonbait



There's a line or two in the piece that discusses forced conversions
done by missionaries.


The Baptist Church of Tripura is alleged to have supplied the NLFT with
arms and financial support and to have encouraged the murder of Hindus,
particularly infants, as a means to depopulate the region of all
Hindus.[49] In 2009, the Assam Times reported that about fifteen armed
Hmar militants, members of Manmasi National Christian Army, tried to
force Hindu residents of Bhuvan Pahar, Assam to convert to
Christianity.[50] A Few Christian evangelists in India have been accused
forced conversion of Hindus, and some of them have been jailed for
forcefully converting.[51][52] Archbishop Moras, refuting these
allegation of forced conversions and the charges of conversions against
the Christian missionaries, said "We do not believe in forced
conversions" "It is easy to charge people with wrong allegations but
difficult to stop evil powers that are working against Christians".[53]


There has been plenty written about forced conversions perpetrated by
christians on people of different faiths. Easy enough for even a moron
like you to find, eh?

If you don't want to go back to the time of the Romans, you can always
check out the Inquisition.





What does the Inquisition have to do with the lie you and kevin and the
rest are telling about "having it shoved down their throats"....??

A line or two of 'allegations' does not support your statement, oh wise ESAD!

Salmonbait


"Christians don?t want to impose their values, but they do recognize
that, in every society, someone?s values must reign supreme. The
question is whose values will predominate? There is no such thing as a
neutral value system. Therefore, Christians work to advance their values
in the sincere belief that, in a world of competing convictions,
Christian values best promote the general welfare and preserve the
domestic tranquility."

From this Christian website:

http://www.gotquestions.org/Christia...se-values.html

http://raw-christianity.com/2012/01/...-my-religious-
values-down-your-throat/


iBoaterer[_2_] January 12th 13 05:49 PM

If you thought...
 
In article , says...

On 1/12/2013 10:30 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:05:30 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/12/13 9:59 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:54:12 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.

"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?

"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."

is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?

" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."

James 2:14-17

What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.

Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.

Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."

That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.

Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.

Cite?

http://tinyurl.com/o42at


Here you go, ignorant asshole:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion


'Evangelical missionaries' are not mentioned once. So from where came your bull****, ESAD?

Here? http://tinyurl.com/o42at


I was just talking to Tim about that... Democrats win with the question,
never even caring about the answers...


Well, perhaps Tim, who IS a REAL Christian will enlighten you as to why
it's not right for a group to take a 10 year old girl 100's of miles
from home and try to talk her into being born again without consulting
her parents. He gets it, you CINO's don't seem to.

Salmonbait[_2_] January 12th 13 05:56 PM

If you thought...
 
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:32:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:47:32 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/12/13 10:43 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:29:23 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/12/13 10:30 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:05:30 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/12/13 9:59 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:54:12 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.

"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?

"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."

is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?

" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."

James 2:14-17

What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.

Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.

Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."

That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.

Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.

Cite?

http://tinyurl.com/o42at


Here you go, ignorant asshole:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion

'Evangelical missionaries' are not mentioned once. So from where came your bull****, ESAD?

Are you channeling iLoogy?


Are you unable to prove your bull****?

Salmonbait



There's a line or two in the piece that discusses forced conversions
done by missionaries.


The Baptist Church of Tripura is alleged to have supplied the NLFT with
arms and financial support and to have encouraged the murder of Hindus,
particularly infants, as a means to depopulate the region of all
Hindus.[49] In 2009, the Assam Times reported that about fifteen armed
Hmar militants, members of Manmasi National Christian Army, tried to
force Hindu residents of Bhuvan Pahar, Assam to convert to
Christianity.[50] A Few Christian evangelists in India have been accused
forced conversion of Hindus, and some of them have been jailed for
forcefully converting.[51][52] Archbishop Moras, refuting these
allegation of forced conversions and the charges of conversions against
the Christian missionaries, said "We do not believe in forced
conversions" "It is easy to charge people with wrong allegations but
difficult to stop evil powers that are working against Christians".[53]


There has been plenty written about forced conversions perpetrated by
christians on people of different faiths. Easy enough for even a moron
like you to find, eh?

If you don't want to go back to the time of the Romans, you can always
check out the Inquisition.





A line or two of 'allegations' does not support your statement, oh wise ESAD!

Salmonbait


They are facts, not allegations, idiot.


Read the article, Kevin.

It must be really dark where your head is, right?

Salmonbait

--

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**

thumper January 12th 13 07:08 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"


There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.


JustWait[_2_] January 12th 13 07:20 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 2:08 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her
daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"


There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.


So you are speculating that this "brainwashing" actually happened,
pretty much because it fits in with your agenda... I get it..

ESAD January 12th 13 07:23 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/13 2:20 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/12/2013 2:08 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her
daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"


There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.


So you are speculating that this "brainwashing" actually happened,
pretty much because it fits in with your agenda... I get it..


A brainwash might do you some good, so long as you did it at a low temp
so you didn't have any more shrinkage. Might get rid of some of that
smut talk you like so much.

thumper January 12th 13 07:27 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 3:41 AM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 2:02 am, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2013 11:26 PM, Tim wrote:

On Jan 12, 12:31 am, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2013 12:19 PM, Salmonbait wrote:


If your sister was more than a dunce, she would not have allowed your niece to go with a church
group. What the hell did she expect?


Exactly, what kind of idiot would trust a church group with a child? ;-)


Me. As a kid, I attended lots of church functions, camps and
gatherings. had a lot of fun too.


?;^ )


My sarcasm wasn't obvious? Just teasing John.


OK. Sometimes I dont' catch on. There's an old saying about Grandma
being old, that applies with me....sometimes



I went to youth camps and activities also. Some were fun but the best
part was just playing with other kids during free time, not the
structured lessons and activities.


Tim January 12th 13 07:28 PM

If you thought...
 
On Jan 12, 7:54*am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.


"Indigenous Catholics?" *And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?


"and, as bait, they were bringing along *church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."


is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?


" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? *Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. *If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? *In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."


James 2:14-17


What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.


Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.


Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
* give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."


That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. *I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.


Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .

But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.

Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .



Tim January 12th 13 07:34 PM

If you thought...
 
On Jan 12, 8:49*am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 9:50 AM, Salmonbait wrote:









On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:26:58 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 12:31 am, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2013 12:19 PM, Salmonbait wrote:


If your sister was more than a dunce, she would not have allowed your niece to go with a church
group. What the hell did she expect?


Exactly, what kind of idiot would trust a church group with a child? ;-)


Me. *As a kid, I attended lots of church functions, camps and
gatherings. had a lot of fun too.


?;^ )


And I'll bet your uncle didn't talk about your mom letting you go and get 'brainwashed'.


Hell, church picnics and potlucks were, and are, the best eatin' around!


Really?

Several of our local churches sell "churchlady" cooked food a few times
a year to raise funds. Perfectly legit. Last summer, we bought two
"barbecue" meals from one of those churches, barbecued chicken and
barbecued ribs. The chicken was overdone, dry, and pretty much
tasteless, the sauce on the ribs tasted like melted sugar, and the
coleslaw and potato salad came from Safeway.

Hardly "the best eatin' around," unless you like bad cooking.


Harry, by buying those meals, it sounds to me like you're supporting
churches who support missionaries Who want to convert others by
cramming religion down their throats.

Not good!!

thumper January 12th 13 07:34 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 6:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , lid says...

On 1/11/2013 12:19 PM, Salmonbait wrote:

If your sister was more than a dunce, she would not have allowed your niece to go with a church
group. What the hell did she expect?


Exactly, what kind of idiot would trust a church group with a child? ;-)


She wanted to go, and a decent parent sometimes lets the reins out a
little. As far as calling my sister an idiot, you must be a real big
cowardly asshole. Hide behind usenet, call someone an idiot that isn't
even part of the group. Are you sure you aren't one of those
"compassionate Christians" too?


um... I thought the meaning was clear, even included a winking smiley...

I was teasing John.

iBoaterer[_2_] January 12th 13 07:40 PM

If you thought...
 
In article ,
says...

On 1/12/13 2:20 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/12/2013 2:08 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her
daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"

There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.


So you are speculating that this "brainwashing" actually happened,
pretty much because it fits in with your agenda... I get it..


A brainwash might do you some good, so long as you did it at a low temp
so you didn't have any more shrinkage. Might get rid of some of that
smut talk you like so much.


You can't wash what isn't there.

JustWait[_2_] January 12th 13 07:41 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.


"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?


"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."


is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?


" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."


James 2:14-17


What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.


Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.


Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."


That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.


Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .

But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.

Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .



Tim.. the only reason they are making up stories in the third person is
because not one of them can actually prove "religion is being shoved
down their throats". Remember, the devil is in the dishonest question..
the answers or truth are irrelevant. Remember Candy Crowley... the
narrative won over truth by a landslide...

JustWait[_2_] January 12th 13 07:44 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 2:34 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 8:49 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 9:50 AM, Salmonbait wrote:









On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:26:58 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 12:31 am, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2013 12:19 PM, Salmonbait wrote:


If your sister was more than a dunce, she would not have allowed your niece to go with a church
group. What the hell did she expect?


Exactly, what kind of idiot would trust a church group with a child? ;-)


Me. As a kid, I attended lots of church functions, camps and
gatherings. had a lot of fun too.


?;^ )


And I'll bet your uncle didn't talk about your mom letting you go and get 'brainwashed'.


Hell, church picnics and potlucks were, and are, the best eatin' around!


Really?

Several of our local churches sell "churchlady" cooked food a few times
a year to raise funds. Perfectly legit. Last summer, we bought two
"barbecue" meals from one of those churches, barbecued chicken and
barbecued ribs. The chicken was overdone, dry, and pretty much
tasteless, the sauce on the ribs tasted like melted sugar, and the
coleslaw and potato salad came from Safeway.

Hardly "the best eatin' around," unless you like bad cooking.


Harry, by buying those meals, it sounds to me like you're supporting
churches who support missionaries Who want to convert others by
cramming religion down their throats.

Not good!!


What it sounds like is another harrytale... Anybody who has ever been to
a church dinner, or pretty much any real "club" dinner knows 99% of the
time, the food is prepared by folks who love what they do, and it's
great.... Unless of course the "club" sees harry coming and spits in his
food, which would not be a surprise at all. Either way, here we see
again a dishonest narrative leading to another red herring...

ESAD January 12th 13 08:13 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/13 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.


"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?


"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."


is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?


" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."


James 2:14-17


What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.


Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.


Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."


That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.


Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .

But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.

Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .


You either listen to the message or you get...nothing. That's the case
with some missionaries in Central and South America.

ESAD January 12th 13 08:16 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/13 2:34 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 8:49 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 9:50 AM, Salmonbait wrote:









On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:26:58 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 12:31 am, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2013 12:19 PM, Salmonbait wrote:


If your sister was more than a dunce, she would not have allowed your niece to go with a church
group. What the hell did she expect?


Exactly, what kind of idiot would trust a church group with a child? ;-)


Me. As a kid, I attended lots of church functions, camps and
gatherings. had a lot of fun too.


?;^ )


And I'll bet your uncle didn't talk about your mom letting you go and get 'brainwashed'.


Hell, church picnics and potlucks were, and are, the best eatin' around!


Really?

Several of our local churches sell "churchlady" cooked food a few times
a year to raise funds. Perfectly legit. Last summer, we bought two
"barbecue" meals from one of those churches, barbecued chicken and
barbecued ribs. The chicken was overdone, dry, and pretty much
tasteless, the sauce on the ribs tasted like melted sugar, and the
coleslaw and potato salad came from Safeway.

Hardly "the best eatin' around," unless you like bad cooking.


Harry, by buying those meals, it sounds to me like you're supporting
churches who support missionaries Who want to convert others by
cramming religion down their throats.

Not good!!


I don't believe the church in question has anything to do with
missionaries. You seem to think I object to religion. I don't. My
objection is to religion that tries to impose its beliefs on those who
either believe differently or don't believe at all. I have no objection
to the voluntary support of neighborhood religious organizations,
except, in this case, I don't think we'll be supporting their barbecues
again. I might try a cake/pie/cookie sale.

thumper January 12th 13 08:17 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 11:20 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/12/2013 2:08 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her
daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"


There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.


So you are speculating that this "brainwashing" actually happened,
pretty much because it fits in with your agenda... I get it..


Read this slowly.

I've experienced threatening coercion specifically from a Baptist youth
leader in rural Michigan. Accept Jesus as your personal savior or burn
in Hell for eternity. Do it now.

It does happen. It's not a situation I would place a young child in
without parental supervision.


iBoaterer[_2_] January 12th 13 08:23 PM

If you thought...
 
In article , says...

On 1/12/2013 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:

On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.

"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?

"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."

is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?

" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."

James 2:14-17

What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.

Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.

Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."

That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.

Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .

But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.

Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .



Tim.. the only reason they are making up stories in the third person is
because not one of them can actually prove "religion is being shoved
down their throats". Remember, the devil is in the dishonest question..
the answers or truth are irrelevant. Remember Candy Crowley... the
narrative won over truth by a landslide...


Oh, man, Scotty talking about others making up stories in the third
person!!!!!! That is all that you present here as "fact". You never,
ever have anything rational to add.

iBoaterer[_2_] January 12th 13 08:26 PM

If you thought...
 
In article , lid says...

On 1/12/2013 11:20 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/12/2013 2:08 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her
daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"

There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.


So you are speculating that this "brainwashing" actually happened,
pretty much because it fits in with your agenda... I get it..


Read this slowly.

I've experienced threatening coercion specifically from a Baptist youth
leader in rural Michigan. Accept Jesus as your personal savior or burn
in Hell for eternity. Do it now.

It does happen. It's not a situation I would place a young child in
without parental supervision.


Damned right it does, those idiots are either in denial or lying.

Tim January 12th 13 08:32 PM

If you thought...
 
On Jan 12, 2:13*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:







On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.


"Indigenous Catholics?" *And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?


"and, as bait, they were bringing along *church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."


is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?


" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? *Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. *If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? *In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."


James 2:14-17


What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.


Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.


Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
* *give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."


That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. *I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.


Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. * But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .


* But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.


Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .


You either listen to the message or you get...nothing. That's the case
with some missionaries in Central and South America.


But you implied that it is ALL! Can you tell me of modern
missionaries that do this? Or is this simply a misconception you are
promoting?

Tim January 12th 13 08:33 PM

If you thought...
 
On Jan 12, 2:16*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:34 PM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 8:49 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 9:50 AM, Salmonbait wrote:


On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:26:58 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 12:31 am, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2013 12:19 PM, Salmonbait wrote:


If your sister was more than a dunce, she would not have allowed your niece to go with a church
group. What the hell did she expect?


Exactly, what kind of idiot would trust a church group with a child? ;-)


Me. *As a kid, I attended lots of church functions, camps and
gatherings. had a lot of fun too.


?;^ )


And I'll bet your uncle didn't talk about your mom letting you go and get 'brainwashed'.


Hell, church picnics and potlucks were, and are, the best eatin' around!


Really?


Several of our local churches sell "churchlady" cooked food a few times
a year to raise funds. Perfectly legit. Last summer, we bought two
"barbecue" meals from one of those churches, barbecued chicken and
barbecued ribs. The chicken was overdone, dry, and pretty much
tasteless, the sauce on the ribs tasted like melted sugar, and the
coleslaw and potato salad came from Safeway.


Hardly "the best eatin' around," unless you like bad cooking.


Harry, by buying those meals, it sounds to me like you're supporting
churches who support missionaries Who want to convert others by
cramming religion down their throats.


Not good!!


I don't believe the church in question has anything to do with
missionaries. You seem to think I object to religion. I don't. My
objection is to religion that tries to impose its beliefs on those who
either believe differently or don't believe at all. I have no objection
to the voluntary support of neighborhood religious organizations,
except, in this case, I don't think we'll be supporting their barbecues
again. I might try a cake/pie/cookie sale.


I know of no 'church' that doesn't support missionaries, Harry.

JustWait[_2_] January 12th 13 08:40 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 3:17 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 11:20 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/12/2013 2:08 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her
daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"

There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.


So you are speculating that this "brainwashing" actually happened,
pretty much because it fits in with your agenda... I get it..


Read this slowly.

I've experienced threatening coercion specifically from a Baptist youth
leader in rural Michigan. Accept Jesus as your personal savior or burn
in Hell for eternity. Do it now.

It does happen. It's not a situation I would place a young child in
without parental supervision.


So, this was what? One incident? Close to what, 60 years ago??? That
really doesn't come any where close to brainwashing or shoving down the
throat... So again, why are we even having this narrative about
something that doesn't happen...

JustWait[_2_] January 12th 13 08:40 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 2:13 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:







On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.


"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?


"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."


is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?


" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."


James 2:14-17


What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.


Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.


Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."


That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.


Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .


But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.


Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .


You either listen to the message or you get...nothing. That's the case
with some missionaries in Central and South America.


But you implied that it is ALL! Can you tell me of modern
missionaries that do this? Or is this simply a misconception you are
promoting?


Ding, ding, ding... we have a winner..:)

Boating All Out January 12th 13 08:52 PM

If you thought...
 
In article , lid says...

On 1/12/2013 11:20 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/12/2013 2:08 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her
daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"

There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.


So you are speculating that this "brainwashing" actually happened,
pretty much because it fits in with your agenda... I get it..


Read this slowly.

I've experienced threatening coercion specifically from a Baptist youth
leader in rural Michigan. Accept Jesus as your personal savior or burn
in Hell for eternity. Do it now.

It does happen. It's not a situation I would place a young child in
without parental supervision.


You could probably encounter that from any religious fanatic.
I went to Baptist church services, "bible school" sessions, and summer
camps for a couple years, maybe age 9-11.
Never heard burning in hell mentioned. Sermons and bible school just
concentrated on interpreting how the meaning of passages applied in
conducting your daily life in a "Christian" manner.
Don't think I even heard the word "saved" in that church.
Don't remember ANY religion taught in the summer camp, just fun.
It was all positive, no negative.
Though I'm not religious, I still consider it was good "shaping" of my
morality.
With Baptists, I think the tone is almost entirely set by the Pastor.
Maybe I got lucky.


JustWait[_2_] January 12th 13 08:52 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 3:33 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 2:16 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:34 PM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 8:49 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 9:50 AM, Salmonbait wrote:


On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:26:58 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 12:31 am, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2013 12:19 PM, Salmonbait wrote:


If your sister was more than a dunce, she would not have allowed your niece to go with a church
group. What the hell did she expect?


Exactly, what kind of idiot would trust a church group with a child? ;-)


Me. As a kid, I attended lots of church functions, camps and
gatherings. had a lot of fun too.


?;^ )


And I'll bet your uncle didn't talk about your mom letting you go and get 'brainwashed'.


Hell, church picnics and potlucks were, and are, the best eatin' around!


Really?


Several of our local churches sell "churchlady" cooked food a few times
a year to raise funds. Perfectly legit. Last summer, we bought two
"barbecue" meals from one of those churches, barbecued chicken and
barbecued ribs. The chicken was overdone, dry, and pretty much
tasteless, the sauce on the ribs tasted like melted sugar, and the
coleslaw and potato salad came from Safeway.


Hardly "the best eatin' around," unless you like bad cooking.


Harry, by buying those meals, it sounds to me like you're supporting
churches who support missionaries Who want to convert others by
cramming religion down their throats.


Not good!!


I don't believe the church in question has anything to do with
missionaries. You seem to think I object to religion. I don't. My
objection is to religion that tries to impose its beliefs on those who
either believe differently or don't believe at all. I have no objection
to the voluntary support of neighborhood religious organizations,
except, in this case, I don't think we'll be supporting their barbecues
again. I might try a cake/pie/cookie sale.


I know of no 'church' that doesn't support missionaries, Harry.


Right on target Tim.

ESAD January 12th 13 08:54 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/13 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 2:13 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:







On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.


"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?


"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."


is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?


" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."


James 2:14-17


What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.


Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.


Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."


That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.


Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .


But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.


Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .


You either listen to the message or you get...nothing. That's the case
with some missionaries in Central and South America.


But you implied that it is ALL! Can you tell me of modern
missionaries that do this? Or is this simply a misconception you are
promoting?


No, I didn't imply all. I have read of missionaries in places like India
withholding services/goods for those who would not convert, and I have
read of other such cases.

As you may suspect, I am not in favor of proselytizing of any kind. I
think the practice is disgusting. If it were up to me, I would expel any
missionaries in foreign countries who engage in proselytizing.

I do know some nuns personally who pay for and run an orphanage in China
where the only concern is taking care of the kids and finding decent
homes for them. The nuns do not teach religion and do not place the kids
in only catholic homes. I support such efforts, as I support religious
people going to disaster areas and helping out, so long as they aren't
shoveling their religion.



ESAD January 12th 13 08:55 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/13 3:33 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 2:16 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:34 PM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 8:49 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 9:50 AM, Salmonbait wrote:


On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:26:58 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 12:31 am, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2013 12:19 PM, Salmonbait wrote:


If your sister was more than a dunce, she would not have allowed your niece to go with a church
group. What the hell did she expect?


Exactly, what kind of idiot would trust a church group with a child? ;-)


Me. As a kid, I attended lots of church functions, camps and
gatherings. had a lot of fun too.


?;^ )


And I'll bet your uncle didn't talk about your mom letting you go and get 'brainwashed'.


Hell, church picnics and potlucks were, and are, the best eatin' around!


Really?


Several of our local churches sell "churchlady" cooked food a few times
a year to raise funds. Perfectly legit. Last summer, we bought two
"barbecue" meals from one of those churches, barbecued chicken and
barbecued ribs. The chicken was overdone, dry, and pretty much
tasteless, the sauce on the ribs tasted like melted sugar, and the
coleslaw and potato salad came from Safeway.


Hardly "the best eatin' around," unless you like bad cooking.


Harry, by buying those meals, it sounds to me like you're supporting
churches who support missionaries Who want to convert others by
cramming religion down their throats.


Not good!!


I don't believe the church in question has anything to do with
missionaries. You seem to think I object to religion. I don't. My
objection is to religion that tries to impose its beliefs on those who
either believe differently or don't believe at all. I have no objection
to the voluntary support of neighborhood religious organizations,
except, in this case, I don't think we'll be supporting their barbecues
again. I might try a cake/pie/cookie sale.


I know of no 'church' that doesn't support missionaries, Harry.


Ahh, but you don't know of *every* church, do you?

ESAD January 12th 13 08:56 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/13 3:40 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/12/2013 3:17 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 11:20 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/12/2013 2:08 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her
daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"

There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.


So you are speculating that this "brainwashing" actually happened,
pretty much because it fits in with your agenda... I get it..


Read this slowly.

I've experienced threatening coercion specifically from a Baptist youth
leader in rural Michigan. Accept Jesus as your personal savior or burn
in Hell for eternity. Do it now.

It does happen. It's not a situation I would place a young child in
without parental supervision.


So, this was what? One incident? Close to what, 60 years ago??? That
really doesn't come any where close to brainwashing or shoving down the
throat... So again, why are we even having this narrative about
something that doesn't happen...


How would you know whether it happens or not? You're an ignorant little
fool.

Boating All Out January 12th 13 09:01 PM

If you thought...
 
In article ,
says...


You either listen to the message or you get...nothing. That's the case
with some missionaries in Central and South America.


So what? You can listen without hearing. It's a choice, not coerced.
Has to be sold to the listener. Their choice.
Same with homeless missions here.
You think they should just air drop in supplies?
Nothing wrong with religion as long as it doesn't write laws.
People should have a vote on law. And here they do.

Tim January 12th 13 09:10 PM

If you thought...
 
On Jan 12, 2:52*pm, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says...











On 1/12/2013 11:20 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/12/2013 2:08 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:


I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her
daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"


There's that binary thinking again. *There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. *Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.


So you are speculating that this "brainwashing" actually happened,
pretty much because it fits in with your agenda... I get it..


Read this slowly.


I've experienced threatening coercion specifically from a Baptist youth
leader in rural Michigan. *Accept Jesus as your personal savior or burn
in Hell for eternity. *Do it now.


It does happen. *It's not a situation I would place a young child in
without parental supervision.


You could probably encounter that from any religious fanatic.
I went to Baptist church services, "bible school" sessions, and summer
camps for a couple years, maybe age 9-11.
Never heard burning in hell mentioned. *Sermons and bible school just
concentrated on interpreting how the meaning of passages applied in
conducting your daily life in a "Christian" manner.
Don't think I even heard the word "saved" in that church.
Don't remember ANY religion taught in the summer camp, just fun.
It was all positive, no negative.
Though I'm not religious, I still consider it was good "shaping" of my
morality.
With Baptists, I think the tone is almost entirely set by the Pastor.
Maybe I got lucky.


No, you didn't just "get lucky." From what I've seen and experienced
is the usual norm.

Tim January 12th 13 09:22 PM

If you thought...
 
On Jan 12, 2:54*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 2:13 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.


"Indigenous Catholics?" *And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?


"and, as bait, they were bringing along *church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."


is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?


" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? *Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. *If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? *In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."


James 2:14-17


What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.


Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.


Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
* * give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."


That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. *I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.


Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death..


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. * But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .


* *But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.


Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .


You either listen to the message or you get...nothing. That's the case
with some missionaries in Central and South America.


But you implied that it is ALL! * * Can you tell me of modern
missionaries that do this? Or is this simply a misconception you are
promoting?


No, I didn't imply all.


"Christians force their beliefs on others in many ways other than
attempts at door to door salesmanship. These include but are not
limited to:..."

I notice you didn't say "some" or "a few"


Tim January 12th 13 09:23 PM

If you thought...
 
On Jan 12, 2:55*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 3:33 PM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 2:16 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:34 PM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 8:49 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 9:50 AM, Salmonbait wrote:


On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:26:58 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 12:31 am, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2013 12:19 PM, Salmonbait wrote:


If your sister was more than a dunce, she would not have allowed your niece to go with a church
group. What the hell did she expect?


Exactly, what kind of idiot would trust a church group with a child? ;-)


Me. *As a kid, I attended lots of church functions, camps and
gatherings. had a lot of fun too.


?;^ )


And I'll bet your uncle didn't talk about your mom letting you go and get 'brainwashed'.


Hell, church picnics and potlucks were, and are, the best eatin' around!


Really?


Several of our local churches sell "churchlady" cooked food a few times
a year to raise funds. Perfectly legit. Last summer, we bought two
"barbecue" meals from one of those churches, barbecued chicken and
barbecued ribs. The chicken was overdone, dry, and pretty much
tasteless, the sauce on the ribs tasted like melted sugar, and the
coleslaw and potato salad came from Safeway.


Hardly "the best eatin' around," unless you like bad cooking.


Harry, by buying those meals, it sounds to me like you're supporting
churches who support missionaries Who want to convert others by
cramming religion down their throats.


Not good!!


I don't believe the church in question has anything to do with
missionaries. You seem to think I object to religion. I don't. My
objection is to religion that tries to impose its beliefs on those who
either believe differently or don't believe at all. I have no objection
to the voluntary support of neighborhood religious organizations,
except, in this case, I don't think we'll be supporting their barbecues
again. I might try a cake/pie/cookie sale.


I know of no 'church' that doesn't support missionaries, Harry.


Ahh, but you don't know of *every* church, do you?


do you?

ESAD January 12th 13 09:47 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/13 4:22 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 2:54 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 2:13 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.


"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?


"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."


is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?


" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."


James 2:14-17


What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.


Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.


Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."


That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.


Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .


But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.


Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .


You either listen to the message or you get...nothing. That's the case
with some missionaries in Central and South America.


But you implied that it is ALL! Can you tell me of modern
missionaries that do this? Or is this simply a misconception you are
promoting?


No, I didn't imply all.


"Christians force their beliefs on others in many ways other than
attempts at door to door salesmanship. These include but are not
limited to:..."

I notice you didn't say "some" or "a few"


I also didn't say "All christians..."

ESAD January 12th 13 09:54 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/13 4:23 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 2:55 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 3:33 PM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 2:16 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:34 PM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 8:49 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 9:50 AM, Salmonbait wrote:


On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:26:58 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 12:31 am, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2013 12:19 PM, Salmonbait wrote:


If your sister was more than a dunce, she would not have allowed your niece to go with a church
group. What the hell did she expect?


Exactly, what kind of idiot would trust a church group with a child? ;-)


Me. As a kid, I attended lots of church functions, camps and
gatherings. had a lot of fun too.


?;^ )


And I'll bet your uncle didn't talk about your mom letting you go and get 'brainwashed'.


Hell, church picnics and potlucks were, and are, the best eatin' around!


Really?


Several of our local churches sell "churchlady" cooked food a few times
a year to raise funds. Perfectly legit. Last summer, we bought two
"barbecue" meals from one of those churches, barbecued chicken and
barbecued ribs. The chicken was overdone, dry, and pretty much
tasteless, the sauce on the ribs tasted like melted sugar, and the
coleslaw and potato salad came from Safeway.


Hardly "the best eatin' around," unless you like bad cooking.


Harry, by buying those meals, it sounds to me like you're supporting
churches who support missionaries Who want to convert others by
cramming religion down their throats.


Not good!!


I don't believe the church in question has anything to do with
missionaries. You seem to think I object to religion. I don't. My
objection is to religion that tries to impose its beliefs on those who
either believe differently or don't believe at all. I have no objection
to the voluntary support of neighborhood religious organizations,
except, in this case, I don't think we'll be supporting their barbecues
again. I might try a cake/pie/cookie sale.


I know of no 'church' that doesn't support missionaries, Harry.


Ahh, but you don't know of *every* church, do you?


do you?


No, thankfully.

Meyer[_2_] January 12th 13 10:14 PM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 3:54 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 2:13 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:







On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:

On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:

On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family
gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their
church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to
proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert
indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were
bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.

"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before
they were
Catholics?

"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."

is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?

" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to
have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a
brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you
says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."

James 2:14-17

What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They
had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans
came
along and destroyed both.

Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned
wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only
they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.

Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."

That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I
have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.

Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many
times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.

Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .

But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.

Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .

You either listen to the message or you get...nothing. That's the case
with some missionaries in Central and South America.


But you implied that it is ALL! Can you tell me of modern
missionaries that do this? Or is this simply a misconception you are
promoting?


No, I didn't imply all. I have read of missionaries in places like India
withholding services/goods for those who would not convert, and I have
read of other such cases.

As you may suspect, I am not in favor of proselytizing of any kind. I
think the practice is disgusting. If it were up to me, I would expel any
missionaries in foreign countries who engage in proselytizing.

I do know some nuns personally who pay for and run an orphanage in China
where the only concern is taking care of the kids and finding decent
homes for them. The nuns do not teach religion and do not place the kids
in only catholic homes. I support such efforts, as I support religious
people going to disaster areas and helping out, so long as they aren't
shoveling their religion.


When's the last time you did charitable work and didn't expect something
in return? Never is my guess.

Tim January 13th 13 12:05 AM

If you thought...
 
On Jan 12, 2:54*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 2:13 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.


"Indigenous Catholics?" *And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?


"and, as bait, they were bringing along *church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."


is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?


" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? *Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. *If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? *In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."


James 2:14-17


What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.


Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.


Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
* * give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."


That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. *I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.


Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death..


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. * But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .


* *But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.


Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .


You either listen to the message or you get...nothing. That's the case
with some missionaries in Central and South America.


But you implied that it is ALL! * * Can you tell me of modern
missionaries that do this? Or is this simply a misconception you are
promoting?


No, I didn't imply all. I have read of missionaries in places like India
withholding services/goods for those who would not convert, and I have
read of other such cases.

"As you may suspect, I am not in favor of proselytizing of any kind. I
think the practice is disgusting. If it were up to me, I would expel any
missionaries in foreign countries who engage in proselytizing...."


And by doing so, you would also be expelling hundreds if not thousands
of health care workers, teachers,dentists, hygienists, dieticians,
carpenters, metallurgists and other craftsmen, farmers, scientists,
engineers, People who can show others how to live healthier...

You'd also be taking a lot of monies out of the local economy that was
provided by those you kicked out of the country.

Yes, Harry, By expelling those pesky foreign bible thumpers, you'd
help keep your third world country "third"




ESAD January 13th 13 12:33 AM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/13 7:05 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 2:54 pm, ESAD wrote:

No, I didn't imply all. I have read of missionaries in places like India
withholding services/goods for those who would not convert, and I have
read of other such cases.

"As you may suspect, I am not in favor of proselytizing of any kind. I
think the practice is disgusting. If it were up to me, I would expel any
missionaries in foreign countries who engage in proselytizing...."


And by doing so, you would also be expelling hundreds if not thousands
of health care workers, teachers,dentists, hygienists, dieticians,
carpenters, metallurgists and other craftsmen, farmers, scientists,
engineers, People who can show others how to live healthier...

You'd also be taking a lot of monies out of the local economy that was
provided by those you kicked out of the country.

Yes, Harry, By expelling those pesky foreign bible thumpers, you'd
help keep your third world country "third"



No need to expel them; all they need to do is get out of the religious
conversion business, eh?

I have a long-time client, an NGO, that helps villages all over the
world, in places like Guatemala, Egypt, Salvador, Bosnia, and India,
train indigenous peoples how to build housing, low rise commercial
buildings, how to build and maintain potable water supplies and
delivery, et cetera, and they manage to do it without peddling religion
or anything else.

If the hundreds or thousands of people you mentioned by occupation are
religious workers, they can do what they do without proselytizing, and
do it for the sake of their saviour.

Tim January 13th 13 12:36 AM

If you thought...
 
On Jan 12, 6:33*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 7:05 PM, Tim wrote:







On Jan 12, 2:54 pm, ESAD wrote:


No, I didn't imply all. I have read of missionaries in places like India
withholding services/goods for those who would not convert, and I have
read of other such cases.


"As you may suspect, I am not in favor of proselytizing of any kind. I
think the practice is disgusting. If it were up to me, I would expel any
missionaries in foreign countries who engage in proselytizing...."


And by doing so, you would also be expelling hundreds if not thousands
of health care workers, teachers,dentists, hygienists, dieticians,
carpenters, metallurgists and other craftsmen, farmers, scientists,
engineers, * People who can show others how to live healthier...


You'd also be taking a lot of monies out of the local economy that was
provided by those you kicked out of the country.


Yes, Harry, By expelling those pesky foreign bible thumpers, you'd
help keep your third world country "third"


No need to expel them; all they need to do is get out of the religious
conversion business, eh?

I have a long-time client, an NGO, that helps villages all over the
world, in places like Guatemala, Egypt, Salvador, Bosnia, and India,
train indigenous peoples how to build housing, low rise commercial
buildings, how to build and maintain potable water supplies and
delivery, et cetera, and they manage to do it without peddling religion
or anything else.

If the hundreds or thousands of people you mentioned by occupation are
religious workers, they can do what they do without proselytizing, and
do it for the sake of their saviour.


If that be the case then why not turn the work over to the inefficient
Peace Corps?

ESAD January 13th 13 12:47 AM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/13 7:36 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 6:33 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 7:05 PM, Tim wrote:







On Jan 12, 2:54 pm, ESAD wrote:


No, I didn't imply all. I have read of missionaries in places like India
withholding services/goods for those who would not convert, and I have
read of other such cases.


"As you may suspect, I am not in favor of proselytizing of any kind. I
think the practice is disgusting. If it were up to me, I would expel any
missionaries in foreign countries who engage in proselytizing...."


And by doing so, you would also be expelling hundreds if not thousands
of health care workers, teachers,dentists, hygienists, dieticians,
carpenters, metallurgists and other craftsmen, farmers, scientists,
engineers, People who can show others how to live healthier...


You'd also be taking a lot of monies out of the local economy that was
provided by those you kicked out of the country.


Yes, Harry, By expelling those pesky foreign bible thumpers, you'd
help keep your third world country "third"


No need to expel them; all they need to do is get out of the religious
conversion business, eh?

I have a long-time client, an NGO, that helps villages all over the
world, in places like Guatemala, Egypt, Salvador, Bosnia, and India,
train indigenous peoples how to build housing, low rise commercial
buildings, how to build and maintain potable water supplies and
delivery, et cetera, and they manage to do it without peddling religion
or anything else.

If the hundreds or thousands of people you mentioned by occupation are
religious workers, they can do what they do without proselytizing, and
do it for the sake of their saviour.


If that be the case then why not turn the work over to the inefficient
Peace Corps?


Inefficient? It's a small force, under 10,000, and most volunteers work
as school teachers or in medical fields to help people not get HIV/AIDs.
Like any group, it has its problems, but it does a lot of good work
around the world without pushing religious superstition.



Meyer[_2_] January 13th 13 12:56 AM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 7:47 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 7:36 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 6:33 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 7:05 PM, Tim wrote:







On Jan 12, 2:54 pm, ESAD wrote:

No, I didn't imply all. I have read of missionaries in places like
India
withholding services/goods for those who would not convert, and I have
read of other such cases.

"As you may suspect, I am not in favor of proselytizing of any kind. I
think the practice is disgusting. If it were up to me, I would
expel any
missionaries in foreign countries who engage in proselytizing...."

And by doing so, you would also be expelling hundreds if not thousands
of health care workers, teachers,dentists, hygienists, dieticians,
carpenters, metallurgists and other craftsmen, farmers, scientists,
engineers, People who can show others how to live healthier...

You'd also be taking a lot of monies out of the local economy that was
provided by those you kicked out of the country.

Yes, Harry, By expelling those pesky foreign bible thumpers, you'd
help keep your third world country "third"

No need to expel them; all they need to do is get out of the religious
conversion business, eh?

I have a long-time client, an NGO, that helps villages all over the
world, in places like Guatemala, Egypt, Salvador, Bosnia, and India,
train indigenous peoples how to build housing, low rise commercial
buildings, how to build and maintain potable water supplies and
delivery, et cetera, and they manage to do it without peddling religion
or anything else.

If the hundreds or thousands of people you mentioned by occupation are
religious workers, they can do what they do without proselytizing, and
do it for the sake of their saviour.


If that be the case then why not turn the work over to the inefficient
Peace Corps?


Inefficient? It's a small force, under 10,000, and most volunteers work
as school teachers or in medical fields to help people not get HIV/AIDs.
Like any group, it has its problems, but it does a lot of good work
around the world without pushing religious superstition.



I don't think promoting religion is as terrible as lying and refusing to
pay taxes.

JustWait[_2_] January 13th 13 01:51 AM

If you thought...
 
On 1/12/2013 4:22 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 12, 2:54 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 3:32 PM, Tim wrote:









On Jan 12, 2:13 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:28 PM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 7:54 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 12, 6:23 am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/12/13 2:21 AM, Tim wrote:


On Jan 11, 2:27 pm, ESAD wrote:
I had in-laws who tried to pull that crap on me at a family gathering in
Florida. They were trying to hustle funds for a trip their church was
planning to take to somewhere in Central America to proselytize. Or
maybe it was South America. One or the other. Basically, they were
heading into some backwoods areas in attempts to convert indigenous
Catholics into Southern Baptists, and, as bait, they were bringing along
church members who were nurses, doctors, et cetera.


"Indigenous Catholics?" And what were the indigenous before they were
Catholics?


"and, as bait, they were bringing along church members who were
nurses, doctors, et cetera."


is it wrong to help people improve their health and their lives?


" What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to
them, Go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but does nothing about
their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by
itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."


James 2:14-17


What were the indigenous peoples before they were catholics? They had
their own culture and their own religions *before* the Europeans came
along and destroyed both.


Interesting quote you provided...sort of a justification for
proselytizing and destroying a people and a culture. It's damned wrong
to go to some backwater area and offer help to people if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours.


Harry I have no idea where you get the notion of " if only they will
give up their beliefs and culture to adopt yours."


That isn't written in the scripture, it isn't even applied. I have no
idea why you feel you need to conjure up these things.


Really? What do evangelical missionaries do? Answer: they preach
Christianity to others with the object of conversion, and many times in
history those conversions were accomplished with the threat of death.


Yeah, a 'history of death'' by ungodly people under the guise of doing
the work of Christ. But if you feel to believe so, then that is your
right .


But you were making a point that there was some kind of a
'bargaining' that was to happen. like medical, shelter, clothing,
food, ...firewood. You give the impression that missionaries use
Christianity as some kind of a tool. You either convert, or you don't
get the goods. There is non of that.


Again, if you feel to believe so, then that is your right .


You either listen to the message or you get...nothing. That's the case
with some missionaries in Central and South America.


But you implied that it is ALL! Can you tell me of modern
missionaries that do this? Or is this simply a misconception you are
promoting?


No, I didn't imply all.


"Christians force their beliefs on others in many ways other than
attempts at door to door salesmanship. These include but are not
limited to:..."

I notice you didn't say "some" or "a few"

I noticed he didn't back up his narrative at all... he can't show any
instance of "religion being forced down their throats".


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com