In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:56:46 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:36:43 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/30/12 6:52 PM, wrote:
Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html

It'll be interesting to see what happens when the first sort of trained
teacher ends up shooting a kid "by sccident."

Hey, this is the United States. Rather than deal with the issues, we arm
teacher.

We arm everybody that is truly expected to protect and defend. Now,
that responsibility falls to those people acting in loco parentis.

Deal with the issues? There is no squishy idealism debate of issues.
This is about crazy armed people looking for a soft underbelly and
finding it among unprotected children. This isn't necessarily about
guns, either. Other countries are having the same problem with crazies
employing knives, machetes, and hatchets to eviscerate and hack off
school children's body parts.

It is already legal for teachers in Utah to carry. I applaud them for
seeking further training in pursuit of protect the children and fellow
employees.

An interesting thing is I have not heard about any shootings in Utah.
I googled Utah Shooting and I got this story, one story about a drug
raid and a ****load of stories and ads for places to shoot.

Maybe those Mormons are too scary to start up any **** with.

So are you ASSuming that the teachers toting guns to school will be any
more mentally stable than the general population of the U.S. where the
shooters have come from?

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...


Maybe those Mormons are too scary to start up any **** with.

So are you ASSuming that the teachers toting guns to school will be any
more mentally stable than the general population of the U.S. where the
shooters have come from?

As a rule, I'd guess teachers are more "mentally stable' than the
"general population." And certainly more stable than gun nuts.
Anti-social teachers don't get far.
The great majority of teachers want no part of guns in the classroom.
We'd have to hire NRA shooters to teach the 3 R's and everything else.
Though you're essentially right on, remember you're talking to gun nuts.
Even Mormons are "too scary."
Mitt Romney is real scary guy. Don't start **** with Mitt Romney.
This is the nature of the gun nut.
I'm sure the Lanza woman thought herself "perfectly normal."
She was a gun nut.
Then you got krause, armed to the teeth with Glocks capable of firing
hundreds of rounds in a minute or two.
Mainly for defense against Scotty and "feral dogs" according to him.
More "general population."
Range time isn't for target shooting per se, it's for "readiness."
All para-military bull****.
Sane people like you and Scotty use their time to make beer and BBQ.
Yep, I consider you and Scotty more sane than a gun nut.
It's a real stretch, but there it is.
We can argue, and nobody's going to pull a gun.
Gun nuts always carry if they think there will be an argument.
They assume another gun nut will attend the argument.
But it's not nearly as wild west out there as most think.
Gun nuts make a lot of noise, but the great majority of people don't own
or want to own guns. And most hunters aren't gun nuts.
In fact, hardly any gun nut is a hunter.
The stats are all skewed. Gun nuts own multiple guns, inflating
"ownership" stats.
Not unusual for a gun nut to own 10 or more guns.
They make at least 10 times as much noise too. Squeaking wheels is why
they are allowed their guns, not the 2nd.
Like pot smokers. Not a big proportion of people smoke pot.
But why do they pass referendums allowing pot smoking?
The pot smokers are all wired to vote.
And the others voting "yes" want pot smokers to just shut the **** up.
Pretty much how I feel about gun nuts.
Just go clean and oil your guns and shut the **** up.
Have your munchie time.
Jesus Christ, just give sane people some peace.

On Monday, December 31, 2012 3:43:40 PM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:

The pot smokers are all wired to vote.

No, they are "wired" to eat cheetos and watch cartoons. They'd forget to vote.

Proof your ramblings are those of an idiot.

In article ,
says...

On Monday, December 31, 2012 3:43:40 PM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:

The pot smokers are all wired to vote.

No, they are "wired" to eat cheetos and watch cartoons. They'd forget to vote.

Proof your ramblings are those of an idiot.

Proof that you are narrow minded.

On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 10:27:26 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Monday, December 31, 2012 3:43:40 PM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:



The pot smokers are all wired to vote.



No, they are "wired" to eat cheetos and watch cartoons. They'd forget to vote.



Proof your ramblings are those of an idiot.



Proof that you are narrow minded.

Have some personal experience with that, eh?

In article ,
says...

On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 10:27:26 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Monday, December 31, 2012 3:43:40 PM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:



The pot smokers are all wired to vote.



No, they are "wired" to eat cheetos and watch cartoons. They'd forget to vote.



Proof your ramblings are those of an idiot.



Proof that you are narrow minded.

Have some personal experience with that, eh?

I sure do, you and Scotty are very narrow minded, and I watch and
listen.

On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 12:07:51 PM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 10:27:26 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







On Monday, December 31, 2012 3:43:40 PM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:







The pot smokers are all wired to vote.







No, they are "wired" to eat cheetos and watch cartoons. They'd forget to vote.







Proof your ramblings are those of an idiot.







Proof that you are narrow minded.



Have some personal experience with that, eh?



I sure do,

So you're a pot-head? Figures.

On 12/31/2012 9:31 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:05:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:56:46 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:36:43 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/30/12 6:52 PM, wrote:
Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html

It'll be interesting to see what happens when the first sort of trained
teacher ends up shooting a kid "by sccident."

Hey, this is the United States. Rather than deal with the issues, we arm
teacher.

We arm everybody that is truly expected to protect and defend. Now,
that responsibility falls to those people acting in loco parentis.

Deal with the issues? There is no squishy idealism debate of issues.
This is about crazy armed people looking for a soft underbelly and
finding it among unprotected children. This isn't necessarily about
guns, either. Other countries are having the same problem with crazies
employing knives, machetes, and hatchets to eviscerate and hack off
school children's body parts.

It is already legal for teachers in Utah to carry. I applaud them for
seeking further training in pursuit of protect the children and fellow
employees.

An interesting thing is I have not heard about any shootings in Utah.
I googled Utah Shooting and I got this story, one story about a drug
raid and a ****load of stories and ads for places to shoot.

Maybe those Mormons are too scary to start up any **** with.

So are you ASSuming that the teachers toting guns to school will be any
more mentally stable than the general population of the U.S. where the
shooters have come from?

No, you are ASSuming that these teachers wouldn't get more scrutiny and
training than "the general population"? Stupid, or dishonest? Anyway,
just like pilots who carry, they are trained and watched more carefully.
And as the poster below noted, most of these shooters are not "part of
the general society". Like alcoholics or heroin addicts almost across
the board these folks are withdrawn and basically non-functional in
society. Fired from jobs, living in some fantasy world somewhere... not
working at teachers and continuing training in firearms use and safety...

So, you think the shooters are representative of the general
population? Interesting logic, that.

He hasn't thought it that far ahead... to do so may mean he changes his
opinion and progressives are opposed to that, afraid they won't be
welcome at the parties anymore

Who else comes from the general population?

In article , says...

On 12/31/2012 9:31 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:05:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:56:46 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:36:43 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/30/12 6:52 PM, wrote:
Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html

It'll be interesting to see what happens when the first sort of trained
teacher ends up shooting a kid "by sccident."

Hey, this is the United States. Rather than deal with the issues, we arm
teacher.

We arm everybody that is truly expected to protect and defend. Now,
that responsibility falls to those people acting in loco parentis.

Deal with the issues? There is no squishy idealism debate of issues.
This is about crazy armed people looking for a soft underbelly and
finding it among unprotected children. This isn't necessarily about
guns, either. Other countries are having the same problem with crazies
employing knives, machetes, and hatchets to eviscerate and hack off
school children's body parts.

It is already legal for teachers in Utah to carry. I applaud them for
seeking further training in pursuit of protect the children and fellow
employees.

An interesting thing is I have not heard about any shootings in Utah.
I googled Utah Shooting and I got this story, one story about a drug
raid and a ****load of stories and ads for places to shoot.

Maybe those Mormons are too scary to start up any **** with.

So are you ASSuming that the teachers toting guns to school will be any
more mentally stable than the general population of the U.S. where the
shooters have come from?

No, you are ASSuming that these teachers wouldn't get more scrutiny and
training than "the general population"? Stupid, or dishonest?

Neither, they don't get any more "scrutiny" than anyone else applying
for a job these days. A background check? That's stupid, just because
someone hasn't done anything YET doesn't mean they wont.

Anyway,
just like pilots who carry, they are trained and watched more carefully.
And as the poster below noted, most of these shooters are not "part of
the general society". Like alcoholics or heroin addicts almost across
the board these folks are withdrawn and basically non-functional in
society.

Cite?

Fired from jobs, living in some fantasy world somewhere... not
working at teachers and continuing training in firearms use and safety...

Safety has NOTHING to do with it, dumb ass. Just because someone is
trained in use of a firearm and safety doesn't mean that they are
mentally stable.

So, you think the shooters are representative of the general
population? Interesting logic, that.

He hasn't thought it that far ahead... to do so may mean he changes his
opinion and progressives are opposed to that, afraid they won't be
welcome at the parties anymore

Where the **** do they come from then? Are you saying that the shooters
come from some underground fantasy world? They don't, they come from,
get this... the general population of the U.S.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:05:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:56:46 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:36:43 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/30/12 6:52 PM, wrote:
Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html

It'll be interesting to see what happens when the first sort of trained
teacher ends up shooting a kid "by sccident."

Hey, this is the United States. Rather than deal with the issues, we arm
teacher.

We arm everybody that is truly expected to protect and defend. Now,
that responsibility falls to those people acting in loco parentis.

Deal with the issues? There is no squishy idealism debate of issues.
This is about crazy armed people looking for a soft underbelly and
finding it among unprotected children. This isn't necessarily about
guns, either. Other countries are having the same problem with crazies
employing knives, machetes, and hatchets to eviscerate and hack off
school children's body parts.

It is already legal for teachers in Utah to carry. I applaud them for
seeking further training in pursuit of protect the children and fellow
employees.

An interesting thing is I have not heard about any shootings in Utah.
I googled Utah Shooting and I got this story, one story about a drug
raid and a ****load of stories and ads for places to shoot.

Maybe those Mormons are too scary to start up any **** with.

So are you ASSuming that the teachers toting guns to school will be any
more mentally stable than the general population of the U.S. where the
shooters have come from?

So, you think the shooters are representative of the general
population? Interesting logic, that.

Who else comes from the general population?

Yes, the shooters came from the general population of the U.S. That's
where everyone else comes from, INCLUDING teachers.