|
This guy doesn't realize that Scientist Scotty says this can't be done!
|
This guy doesn't realize that Scientist Scotty says this can't be done!
|
This guy doesn't realize that Scientist Scotty says this can't be done!
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:17:06 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Again, there is NO "government requirement to produce electric cars". There is an $8000 subsidy to buy one and at least one state that will require your car to be ZEV to register it so this is a distinction without a difference. Bull****. In CA you can get '60's vintage cars registered that surely don't meet there strict emissions regulations. Show me where in any state you'll only be able to register an ZEV vehicle. Show me. You are an idiot. |
This guy doesn't realize that Scientist Scotty says this can't be done!
BAR wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:17:06 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Again, there is NO "government requirement to produce electric cars". There is an $8000 subsidy to buy one and at least one state that will require your car to be ZEV to register it so this is a distinction without a difference. Bull****. In CA you can get '60's vintage cars registered that surely don't meet there strict emissions regulations. Show me where in any state you'll only be able to register an ZEV vehicle. Show me. You are an idiot. True you can register that 60's car. You have to register it. If you have an unregistered car on your property, they can come and confiscate said vehicle. May be a $500k classic, but they will take it and crush it. Older cars, before smog controls are exempt from same. The state under dictator Brown, has passed mpg rules, where a manufacturer will have to sell lots of ZEV to be able to sell cars people want and need. So those people buying a larger vehicle will be subsidizing those who buy a ZEV. |
This guy doesn't realize that Scientist Scotty says this can't be done!
|
Cowardly Kevin Noble is out trolling again...
In article 903894248376509238.553731bmckeenospam-
, says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 125732330376450258.964136bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 615113602376355095.324642bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 107555478376348352.875653bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 185336218376284656.888165bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article 1493745639376183490.518525bmckeenospam- , says... JustWait wrote: On 12/2/2012 12:59 PM, wrote: On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:43:53 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/crdb3z9 If you really think this will be a net zero home you are delusional. That tiny solar array won't even run the A/C for a 4500 sq/ft house. You can pay a lot of electric bills for the half million extra this house costs over the garden variety megabuck Rutenburg house. Even if it was a zero sum home. Those that can afford a 4000'+ home should be able to afford electricity. Part of our housing problem is all these middle class or lower people who just needed a large mansion. Hang the cost vs. income, I got a cheap loan! Affording electricity has NOTHING to do with it. -------------------------- It has lots to do with it in this case. No, it doesn't. How much energy are those solar panels going to save? Consider the energy to make a small home system. Cheaper to buy the electricity, and may even be more energy efficient. It's a net zero home, fool. You do know what that means, don't you? How much energy was expended to generate the "net zero"? You are babbling like Scotty now..... Well how much energy did it take to make the solar panel and controls? Will that amount of energy be recovered over the life of the panels? You are the babbling and grasping at straws. How much energy does it cost to build a coal fired plant? A nuclear plant? A lot, but per customer a heck of a lot less than a home solar panel. If it was a financially viable solution, utilities would be building lots of solar plants, and you would not need a 25% tax credit to install them. Cite? You research the contrarian view and cite that. Not up to me to do your research. As expected. |
This guy doesn't realize that Scientist Scotty says this can't be done!
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:17:06 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Again, there is NO "government requirement to produce electric cars". There is an $8000 subsidy to buy one and at least one state that will require your car to be ZEV to register it so this is a distinction without a difference. Bull****. In CA you can get '60's vintage cars registered that surely don't meet there strict emissions regulations. Show me where in any state you'll only be able to register an ZEV vehicle. Show me. You are an idiot. Do tell then, what did he mean by "at least one state that will REQUIRE your car to be ZEV to register"??? |
This guy doesn't realize that Scientist Scotty says this can't be done!
In article 2029535646376538862.699507bmckeenospam-
, says... BAR wrote: In article , says... In article , says... On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:17:06 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Again, there is NO "government requirement to produce electric cars". There is an $8000 subsidy to buy one and at least one state that will require your car to be ZEV to register it so this is a distinction without a difference. Bull****. In CA you can get '60's vintage cars registered that surely don't meet there strict emissions regulations. Show me where in any state you'll only be able to register an ZEV vehicle. Show me. You are an idiot. True you can register that 60's car. You have to register it. If you have an unregistered car on your property, they can come and confiscate said vehicle. May be a $500k classic, but they will take it and crush it. Older cars, before smog controls are exempt from same. The state under dictator Brown, has passed mpg rules, where a manufacturer will have to sell lots of ZEV to be able to sell cars people want and need. So those people buying a larger vehicle will be subsidizing those who buy a ZEV. But Greg said that cars will be REQUIRED to be ZEV's to be registered, that is bull****. |
This guy doesn't realize that Scientist Scotty says this can't be done!
"iBoaterer" wrote in message
... In article 2029535646376538862.699507bmckeenospam- , says... BAR wrote: In article , says... In article , says... On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:17:06 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Again, there is NO "government requirement to produce electric cars". There is an $8000 subsidy to buy one and at least one state that will require your car to be ZEV to register it so this is a distinction without a difference. Bull****. In CA you can get '60's vintage cars registered that surely don't meet there strict emissions regulations. Show me where in any state you'll only be able to register an ZEV vehicle. Show me. You are an idiot. True you can register that 60's car. You have to register it. If you have an unregistered car on your property, they can come and confiscate said vehicle. May be a $500k classic, but they will take it and crush it. Older cars, before smog controls are exempt from same. The state under dictator Brown, has passed mpg rules, where a manufacturer will have to sell lots of ZEV to be able to sell cars people want and need. So those people buying a larger vehicle will be subsidizing those who buy a ZEV. But Greg said that cars will be REQUIRED to be ZEV's to be registered, that is bull****. -------------------- Less semantic error than 99% of your writings. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com