On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:35:07 -0400, Meyer wrote:


What crime was broken?


The'll have fun with this one. Snerk

I don't know about Canadian law, but if slammer was in the US, he could
get 5 years. Besides, it's just flat out obnoxious behavior.

http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?
id=2064&s=latestnews

On 8/29/2012 12:09 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 8/29/12 11:43 AM, North Star wrote:
On Aug 29, 12:38 pm, Meyer wrote:
On 8/29/2012 10:26 AM, iBoaterer wrote:





In article , earl8386
@hotmail.com says...

North Star wrote:
On Aug 26, 4:51 am, "*e#c" wrote:
On Aug 25, 4:00 pm, North Star wrote:

On Aug 25, 4:19 pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Aug 25, 9:04 am, North Star wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:27 pm, "*e#c" wrote:
Now, ****face, lets see a picture of YOU standing in, or in front of
YOUR Boat.
If you dont post a picture, everyone will know you DONT own a ****ing
Boat, you tank of **** !!!!
http://i539.photobucket.com/albums/f...ScottsBoat.jpg
That goes double for you, White, you ass-licking champion bitch of
Harrys
Maybe we should take bets on when you slink off and hide again. That's
what usually happens when you wind down from your maniacal ranting and
raving.
Look at Don the bitch s reply, same as his Master, Harry.
You'd be best to shut your mouth , and put it back on Harrys cock
where it always is.
I'd bet if I asked, I could obtain your address real quick........
So what..coming down to visit?
I'd advise against it if you plan on starting trouble. Enjoy those
yellow teeth while you have them.
Is that all you got, old man?
Using someone elses bull****?
What a joke you are.
Dont you treat my going anywhere lightly, asshole.
If I did "come down for a visit " , it wouldnt be a friendly tour.
You'd be the worse for wear .
I'll bet I could get lots of cooperation from those here who would
love to see me kneecap you.
Harry wouldnt be able to save your worthless wrinkled ass.
Buford wants to meet you !

And your dirt hole of a house wouldnt save your lazy ass either. Have
you cleaned up the garbage yet? Nevemind,........ you havent.
How many times did you threaten to visit Snotty...only to go
whimpering off in self seclusion?
I will save your threatening posts though.....just in case you do show
up and I have to explain my actions to the local police.
Are you going to hit him over the head with your Playbook?

That's about what that POS is worth!

There are easier ways to trash a playbook.

Stupid Kevin actually thinks FattyBumpkin is worth as much as my
PlayBook... to whom??


Meyer is another "anonymous" poster and therefore his opinions don't count.

Right, "X'Man"!!!!


Most people have more to do than sit in their celler counting opinions.

On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:15:04 PM UTC-4, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:35:07 -0400, Meyer wrote:





What crime was broken?


The'll have fun with this one. Snerk


I don't know about Canadian law, but if slammer was in the US, he could
get 5 years. Besides, it's just flat out obnoxious behavior.

http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?
id=2064&s=latestnews

Maybe not. One provision of that law is that it must be associated with interstate commerce. Email qualifies because it's a business tool, but I wouldn't think usenet does.

On 8/29/12 12:30 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:15:04 PM UTC-4, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:35:07 -0400, Meyer wrote:





What crime was broken?


The'll have fun with this one. Snerk


I don't know about Canadian law, but if slammer was in the US, he could
get 5 years. Besides, it's just flat out obnoxious behavior.

http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?
id=2064&s=latestnews

Maybe not. One provision of that law is that it must be associated with interstate commerce. Email qualifies because it's a business tool, but I wouldn't think usenet does.



The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce under
United States Code.


--

What do the Republican Party of the United States and the Muslim
Brotherhood of the Arab World have in common? They're both faith-based
parties, they both deny science, and they both wage war on women.

On 8/29/2012 12:30 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:15:04 PM UTC-4, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:35:07 -0400, Meyer wrote:





What crime was broken?


The'll have fun with this one. Snerk


I don't know about Canadian law, but if slammer was in the US, he could
get 5 years. Besides, it's just flat out obnoxious behavior.

http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?
id=2064&s=latestnews

Maybe not. One provision of that law is that it must be associated with interstate commerce. Email qualifies because it's a business tool, but I wouldn't think usenet does.


Yes, you are correct. That's the difference between what Slammer is
doing and what harry and don did when they sent information through
email for the purpose of intimidation, that is a felony in the US, don't
know what they call it up there.

On 8/29/12 12:43 PM, JustWait wrote:



harry and don did when they sent information through
email for the purpose of intimidation, that is a felony in the US, don't
know what they call it up there.

Liar.


--

What do the Republican Party of the United States and the Muslim
Brotherhood of the Arab World have in common? They're both faith-based
parties, they both deny science, and they both wage war on women.

On Aug 29, 1:43*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 8/29/2012 12:30 PM, wrote:





On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:15:04 PM UTC-4, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:35:07 -0400, Meyer wrote:

What crime was broken?

The'll have fun with this one. Snerk

I don't know about Canadian law, but if slammer was in the US, he could
get 5 years. *Besides, it's just flat out obnoxious behavior.

http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?
id=2064&s=latestnews

Maybe not. *One provision of that law is that it must be associated with interstate commerce. *Email qualifies because it's a business tool, but I wouldn't think usenet does.

Yes, you are correct. That's the difference between what Slammer is
doing and what harry and don did when they sent information through
email for the purpose of intimidation, that is a felony in the US, don't
know what they call it up there.

...and how do they protect against false accusations down there,
MiniMan?

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 8/29/12 12:09 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 8/29/12 11:43 AM, North Star wrote:
On Aug 29, 12:38 pm, Meyer wrote:
On 8/29/2012 10:26 AM, iBoaterer wrote:





In article , earl8386
@hotmail.com says...

North Star wrote:
On Aug 26, 4:51 am, "*e#c" wrote:
On Aug 25, 4:00 pm, North Star wrote:

On Aug 25, 4:19 pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Aug 25, 9:04 am, North Star wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:27 pm, "*e#c" wrote:
Now, ****face, lets see a picture of YOU standing in, or in front of
YOUR Boat.
If you dont post a picture, everyone will know you DONT own a ****ing
Boat, you tank of **** !!!!
http://i539.photobucket.com/albums/f...ScottsBoat.jpg
That goes double for you, White, you ass-licking champion bitch of
Harrys
Maybe we should take bets on when you slink off and hide again. That's
what usually happens when you wind down from your maniacal ranting and
raving.
Look at Don the bitch s reply, same as his Master, Harry.
You'd be best to shut your mouth , and put it back on Harrys cock
where it always is.
I'd bet if I asked, I could obtain your address real quick........
So what..coming down to visit?
I'd advise against it if you plan on starting trouble. Enjoy those
yellow teeth while you have them.
Is that all you got, old man?
Using someone elses bull****?
What a joke you are.
Dont you treat my going anywhere lightly, asshole.
If I did "come down for a visit " , it wouldnt be a friendly tour.
You'd be the worse for wear .
I'll bet I could get lots of cooperation from those here who would
love to see me kneecap you.
Harry wouldnt be able to save your worthless wrinkled ass.
Buford wants to meet you !

And your dirt hole of a house wouldnt save your lazy ass either. Have
you cleaned up the garbage yet? Nevemind,........ you havent.
How many times did you threaten to visit Snotty...only to go
whimpering off in self seclusion?
I will save your threatening posts though.....just in case you do show
up and I have to explain my actions to the local police.
Are you going to hit him over the head with your Playbook?

That's about what that POS is worth!

There are easier ways to trash a playbook.

Stupid Kevin actually thinks FattyBumpkin is worth as much as my
PlayBook... to whom??


Meyer is another "anonymous" poster and therefore his opinions don't count.

Right, "X'Man"!!!!


I'm not an anonymous poster, ****-for-brains. My handle may be
anonymous, but I am not anonymous here.

That's only because you were/are too stupid to think that any harm can
be done by ignorantly posting your real information. You didn't
volunteer ANY personal information here, you were outed.

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 8/29/12 12:30 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:15:04 PM UTC-4, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:35:07 -0400, Meyer wrote:





What crime was broken?


The'll have fun with this one. Snerk


I don't know about Canadian law, but if slammer was in the US, he could
get 5 years. Besides, it's just flat out obnoxious behavior.

http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?
id=2064&s=latestnews

Maybe not. One provision of that law is that it must be associated with interstate commerce. Email qualifies because it's a business tool, but I wouldn't think usenet does.



The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce under
United States Code.

Cite?

On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:37:42 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/29/12 12:30 PM, wrote:

On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:15:04 PM UTC-4, thunder wrote:

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:35:07 -0400, Meyer wrote:


What crime was broken?

The'll have fun with this one. Snerk

I don't know about Canadian law, but if slammer was in the US, he could

get 5 years. Besides, it's just flat out obnoxious behavior.



http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?

id=2064&s=latestnews



Maybe not. One provision of that law is that it must be associated with interstate commerce. Email qualifies because it's a business tool, but I wouldn't think usenet does.


The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce under
United States Code.

Actually, it's considered a "channel" of commerce over which interstate (and international) commerce takes place. The power of regulation seems to hinge around activities having an economic impact. And as you know, if you've been following the attempts to regulate internet activity by state and federal governments, it's far from being settled.