On 8/29/12 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:37:42 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/29/12 12:30 PM, wrote:

On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:15:04 PM UTC-4, thunder wrote:

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:35:07 -0400, Meyer wrote:


What crime was broken?

The'll have fun with this one. Snerk

I don't know about Canadian law, but if slammer was in the US, he could

get 5 years. Besides, it's just flat out obnoxious behavior.



http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?

id=2064&s=latestnews



Maybe not. One provision of that law is that it must be associated with interstate commerce. Email qualifies because it's a business tool, but I wouldn't think usenet does.


The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce under
United States Code.

Actually, it's considered a "channel" of commerce over which interstate (and international) commerce takes place. The power of regulation seems to hinge around activities having an economic impact. And as you know, if you've been following the attempts to regulate internet activity by state and federal governments, it's far from being settled.



It wouldn't bother me to see scumbags like PsychoScotty and Slammer, who
make specific threats over usenet, prosecuted for such activities. In
fact, such prosecutions would set a good example.

--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:47:21 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce under
United States Code.

Cite?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Baker

On 8/29/2012 5:38 PM, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:47:21 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce under
United States Code.

Cite?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Baker


Wouldn't it be wild for Mr. Dr. Karen Grear with two sexual predator
convictions to get another felony here. That could be life in prison,
which would probably be less than two weeks for krause...

On 8/29/12 5:59 PM, JustWait wrote:
That could be life in prison,
which would probably be less than two weeks for krause...


If memory serves, you've claimed to be suffering from a heart condition
and you claim to be a cancer survivor, and you're the one who makes
threats and involves "motorcycle gang members" in your threats.

Therefore, your life expectancy probably is less than mine. Oh, and you
don't have medical insurance.

It really must suck to be you...

Oh, how's that losing motorbike racing team doing?


--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

In article , says...

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:47:21 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce under
United States Code.

Cite?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Baker

I KNEW someone would bring up U.S. v Baker, that's why I asked!!! You do
realize that he was aquitted of all original counts, right? The only
thing they could get him for was a trumped up charge when they couldn't
persue the original charges.

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:35:49 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:47:21 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce
under United States Code.

Cite?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Baker

I KNEW someone would bring up U.S. v Baker, that's why I asked!!! You do
realize that he was aquitted of all original counts, right? The only
thing they could get him for was a trumped up charge when they couldn't
persue the original charges.

You wanted a cite that the internet is considered a form of interstate
commerce under the United States Code. I gave you one. His quilt or
innocence is irrelevant to this conversation, but the ibls.com cite,
given above, is completely relevant.

On 8/29/12 7:07 PM, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:35:49 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:47:21 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce
under United States Code.

Cite?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Baker

I KNEW someone would bring up U.S. v Baker, that's why I asked!!! You do
realize that he was aquitted of all original counts, right? The only
thing they could get him for was a trumped up charge when they couldn't
persue the original charges.

You wanted a cite that the internet is considered a form of interstate
commerce under the United States Code. I gave you one. His quilt or
innocence is irrelevant to this conversation, but the ibls.com cite,
given above, is completely relevant.


You expect the morons here to be able to read for comprehension?

--

What do the Republican Party of the United States and the Muslim
Brotherhood of the Arab World have in common? They're both faith-based
parties, they both deny science, and they both wage war on women.

iBoaterer wrote:
In article b8b26c0e-92d6-44f1-b157-e31929316205
@q20g2000vbx.googlegroups.com, says...
On Aug 27, 10:01 pm, Earl wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article 0f9806de-53e0-4b9c-b961-4e5702e5d128
@c19g2000vbb.googlegroups.com, says...
On Aug 26, 10:27 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 8/26/12 9:24 PM, *e#c wrote:
Go ahead. You wouldn't know when its coming. Maybe when you, and your
Wife are out at Walmart, or the Grocery Store, someone will walk up to
you, tap you on the shoulder, and watch you **** YOUR pants as you
turn around.... Then what, ****face?
You know what I look like....better be watching for my ugly mug. I
dont have to cross any Border to get to you, ****er. Buford wants to
meet you.
I got LOTS of time......you're going to die soon enough from old
age..... Then , Harry will have to find a new bitch....but won't.
He'll just wrinkle up and die, down in the basement, ****ing his pants
into his Depends in fear.
Wow...got some real issues there, hey, fella? You are as whacked-out as
PsychoScotty.
--
What do the Republican Party of the United States and the Muslim
Brotherhood of the Arab World have in common? They're both faith-based
parties, they both deny science, and they both wage war on women.
I see he is pulling some of this same crap in a guitar newsgroup.
He probably should be committed into a facility before he gets himself
hurt... or worse.
You sure do like to stalk people, eh?
These two really should relax and realize that they are typing on a
computer to someone they have never met. Calling someone an asshole is
one thing. These threats are another matter.
Typical criminally insane behaviour.
What crime was broken?
Crime? None. Law? None.

On Aug 29, 9:35*pm, Earl wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article b8b26c0e-92d6-44f1-b157-e31929316205
@q20g2000vbx.googlegroups.com, says...
On Aug 27, 10:01 pm, Earl wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article 0f9806de-53e0-4b9c-b961-4e5702e5d128
@c19g2000vbb.googlegroups.com, says...
On Aug 26, 10:27 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 8/26/12 9:24 PM, *e#c wrote:
Go ahead. You wouldn't know when its coming. Maybe when you, and your
Wife are out at Walmart, or the Grocery Store, someone will walk up to
you, tap you on the shoulder, and watch you **** YOUR pants as you
turn around.... Then what, ****face?
You know what I look like....better be watching for my ugly mug. *I
dont have to cross any Border to get to you, ****er. Buford wants to
meet you.
I got LOTS of time......you're going to die soon enough from old
age..... Then , Harry will have to find a new bitch....but won't.
He'll just wrinkle up and die, down in the basement, ****ing his pants
into his Depends in fear.
Wow...got some real issues there, hey, fella? You are as whacked-out as
PsychoScotty.
--
What do the Republican Party of the United States and the Muslim
Brotherhood of the Arab World have in common? They're both faith-based
parties, they both deny science, and they both wage war on women.
I see he is pulling some of this same crap in a guitar newsgroup.
He probably should be committed into a facility before he gets himself
hurt... or worse.
You sure do like to stalk people, eh?
These two really should relax and realize that they are typing on a
computer to someone they have never met. *Calling someone an asshole is
one thing. *These threats are another matter.
Typical criminally insane behaviour.
What crime was broken?

Crime? *None. *Law? *None.

....and this is the legal advice from a counterman at a contractor
supply store?
You'd best stick to scaring teenyboppers.

In article , says...

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:35:49 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:47:21 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce
under United States Code.

Cite?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Baker

I KNEW someone would bring up U.S. v Baker, that's why I asked!!! You do
realize that he was aquitted of all original counts, right? The only
thing they could get him for was a trumped up charge when they couldn't
persue the original charges.

You wanted a cite that the internet is considered a form of interstate
commerce under the United States Code. I gave you one. His quilt or
innocence is irrelevant to this conversation, but the ibls.com cite,
given above, is completely relevant.

No, it's not. in U.S. v Baker, the "relevant" thing was they proved that
he was innocent BECAUSE the internet was NOT considered a form of
interstate commerce.