| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Update on ecigs...
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:03:37 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 2/27/12 4:57 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:30:51 -0500, X ` wrote: On 2/26/12 11:20 AM, BAR wrote: In articlebeCdnXwnuLSUytfSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 2/26/12 10:56 AM, BAR wrote: Where are the independently duplicated and peer reviewed research that shows that second hand smoke causes health problems? The medical and scientific fields are rife with incorrect conclusions, sub-standard methods and politically driven persons. What are your qualifications to find, understand, and judge legitimate medical research? You are too funny. What are you qualifications to question anyone else's qualifications? I think if you are going to try to challenge peer-reviewed medical research in scientific publications, you ought to have some recognizable qualifications. Hate to interrupt, but you gotta admit he got you with that question! The conclusions he stated regarding the incorrect conclusions, etc, of research doesn't require special qualifications. An hour or two of 60 Minutes once in a while will demonstrate same. I don't see how he "got" me. I'm smart enough and educated enough to know I don't have the education and knowledge to reasonably dispute published, peer-reviewed research in medical/scientific areas. I have two college degrees; BAR has none. I don't dispute that from time to time there have been problems with research, but that doesn't mean I am going to accept the Luddite view of the world presented by Fox News and the other non-believers in science. Harry, he made no mention of trying to 'dispute' anything. He asked where it was. Amen, that's all she wrote. 60 Minutes is not a Fox News program. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| update | Boat Building | |||
| GB update | General | |||
| "26 Again" update | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
