About Us

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:22:59 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 2/27/12 4:16 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:41 -0500, wrote:

Did you and Scotty see the "peer reviewed" studies I posted? You haven't
responded.... odd....

Every majority that wants to discriminate against a minority has Peer
Reviewed studies to prove they are right whether it is Goebbels, David
Duke or Rick Santorum.
When all of the "peers" are anti smoking groups it is not surprising
that they come to the same conclusion about very low levels of second
hand smoke.

You think "peers" should be pro-smoking?

No but they should be pro freedom.

There are acceptable threshold limit values on every chemical in
cigarette smoke but they do not apply if the source is cigarette
smoke.

I'm pro freedom. I've stated here in this thread many, many times. I
don't care how much someone smokes. Get your kids to smoke. Take them to
the smoking lounge at the airport, I don't care.
BUT, smokers are DIRECTLY harming the health of innocent people. THAT is
the problem.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode