On 12/18/11 12:29 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:58:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:


It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Pretty sick, Harry.

I guess you're in favor of a strong mute swan population in the bay? Do you read anything at all
about the bay? Here, learn something. I'd sign you up, but then you'd probably accuse me of
'stalking' you.


I've never been a "mankind uber alles" kind of guy, herring. It's too
bad the swans were introduced here but, after all, it was man that did
it, by importing them, and now you want to kill them all because it
didn't work out the way your ancestors here intended?



--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/oR82kN

On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:49:35 -0500, X ` Man wrote:

On 12/18/11 12:29 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:58:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:


It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Pretty sick, Harry.

I guess you're in favor of a strong mute swan population in the bay? Do you read anything at all
about the bay? Here, learn something. I'd sign you up, but then you'd probably accuse me of
'stalking' you.


I've never been a "mankind uber alles" kind of guy, herring. It's too
bad the swans were introduced here but, after all, it was man that did
it, by importing them, and now you want to kill them all because it
didn't work out the way your ancestors here intended?

Kill them because they're causing the death of many of the species native to the bay. Has nothing to
do with my ancestors.

Do some more reading.

On 12/18/11 1:04 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:49:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 12:29 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:58:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:


It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Pretty sick, Harry.

I guess you're in favor of a strong mute swan population in the bay? Do you read anything at all
about the bay? Here, learn something. I'd sign you up, but then you'd probably accuse me of
'stalking' you.


I've never been a "mankind uber alles" kind of guy, herring. It's too
bad the swans were introduced here but, after all, it was man that did
it, by importing them, and now you want to kill them all because it
didn't work out the way your ancestors here intended?

Kill them because they're causing the death of many of the species native to the bay. Has nothing to
do with my ancestors.

Do some more reading.

You do realize the native Americans can say the same about you, right?

--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/oR82kN

On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:06:41 -0500, X ` Man wrote:

On 12/18/11 1:04 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:49:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 12:29 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:58:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:


It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Pretty sick, Harry.

I guess you're in favor of a strong mute swan population in the bay? Do you read anything at all
about the bay? Here, learn something. I'd sign you up, but then you'd probably accuse me of
'stalking' you.


I've never been a "mankind uber alles" kind of guy, herring. It's too
bad the swans were introduced here but, after all, it was man that did
it, by importing them, and now you want to kill them all because it
didn't work out the way your ancestors here intended?

Kill them because they're causing the death of many of the species native to the bay. Has nothing to
do with my ancestors.

Do some more reading.

You do realize the native Americans can say the same about you, right?

Actually, I'm not doing much damage to species in the bay. And, what native Americans do or say has
little to do with the damage caused by mute swans in the Chesapeake Bay.

On 12/18/11 1:36 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:06:41 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 1:04 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:49:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 12:29 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:58:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:


It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Pretty sick, Harry.

I guess you're in favor of a strong mute swan population in the bay? Do you read anything at all
about the bay? Here, learn something. I'd sign you up, but then you'd probably accuse me of
'stalking' you.


I've never been a "mankind uber alles" kind of guy, herring. It's too
bad the swans were introduced here but, after all, it was man that did
it, by importing them, and now you want to kill them all because it
didn't work out the way your ancestors here intended?

Kill them because they're causing the death of many of the species native to the bay. Has nothing to
do with my ancestors.

Do some more reading.

You do realize the native Americans can say the same about you, right?

Actually, I'm not doing much damage to species in the bay. And, what native Americans do or say has
little to do with the damage caused by mute swans in the Chesapeake Bay.









Whoosh.

--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/oR82kN