On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:32:06 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



"jps" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


62 doesn't make you old, unless your interaction with the world has
stopped evolving.

---------------------------------------------------

In many ways I think our society has become carried away with "political
correctness".
42 years ago I often told a young, very attractive woman how beautiful she
was.
She didn't sue me. She married me.

Eisboch

Was your wife someone else's girlfriend at the time, standing right
there?

I totally understand the sentiment but doing that in the presence of
your friend/her boyfriend seems out of place, even if it happened in
the era of free love.

Telling a woman she's beautiful is one of the best pickup lines there
are!!! It's also a good way to soften the wife.

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:32:06 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



"jps" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


62 doesn't make you old, unless your interaction with the world has
stopped evolving.

---------------------------------------------------

In many ways I think our society has become carried away with "political
correctness".
42 years ago I often told a young, very attractive woman how beautiful she
was.
She didn't sue me. She married me.

Eisboch

Was your wife someone else's girlfriend at the time, standing right
there?

I totally understand the sentiment but doing that in the presence of
your friend/her boyfriend seems out of place, even if it happened in
the era of free love.

Telling a woman she's beautiful is one of the best pickup lines there
are!!! It's also a good way to soften the wife.

--------------------------------------------------------

I don't know your age, but I know that 42 years ago it wasn't a "pickup"
line.
It was considered a compliment and it was sincere.

Yeah, maybe I have stopped my social evolution ..... thankfully.
Tip-Toeing through the tulips isn't exactly my style.

BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with.
Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall
to
convince me he's POTUS material anyway.

On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote:
..

BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with.
Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the
wall to
convince me he's POTUS material anyway.



Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally
compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul
cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get
traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and
compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't
see him beating Obama.

"X ` Man" wrote in message ...

On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote:
..

BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with.
Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the
wall to
convince me he's POTUS material anyway.



Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally
compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul
cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get
traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and
compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't
see him beating Obama.

-----------------------------------------

Nope.

I'll tell you ... Bill Clinton, ... now that he's not running for anything
and is not necessarily obligated to align himself 100 percent
with the Democratic party-line ... is making more sense to me than any of
the current crop of candidates for office or
incumbents (on either side) that are simply echoing party-line politics.
Listening to him now on Morning Joe, he has put
partisan politics aside and is melding the best ideas of both parties
including some of his own. He is one of the few that
has studied the past 30 years or so and understands the economic trends that
have taken place as we moved to a
global competitive economy. Clinton offers productive thoughts and ideas
rather than pointing fingers and casting blame like the rest of
the political banana heads seeking or holding political office.

Eisboch

On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote:
.

BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with.
Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the
wall to
convince me he's POTUS material anyway.



Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally
compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul
cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get
traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and
compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't
see him beating Obama.

Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else...

On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote:
.

BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with.
Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the
wall to
convince me he's POTUS material anyway.



Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally
compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul
cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get
traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and
compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't
see him beating Obama.

Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else...


I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then
putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es
off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt,
grunt, grunt.

On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote:
.

BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with.
Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the
wall to
convince me he's POTUS material anyway.



Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally
compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul
cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get
traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and
compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't
see him beating Obama.

Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else...


I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then
putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es
off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt,
grunt, grunt.

Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty.

On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote:
.

BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with.
Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the
wall to
convince me he's POTUS material anyway.



Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally
compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul
cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get
traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and
compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't
see him beating Obama.

Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else...


I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then
putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es
off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt,
grunt, grunt.

Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty.

Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one
liners from Harry, clever? LOL!

On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:05:48 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



"jps" wrote in message ...

On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:32:06 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



"jps" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


62 doesn't make you old, unless your interaction with the world has
stopped evolving.

---------------------------------------------------

In many ways I think our society has become carried away with "political
correctness".
42 years ago I often told a young, very attractive woman how beautiful she
was.
She didn't sue me. She married me.

Eisboch

Was your wife someone else's girlfriend at the time, standing right
there?

I totally understand the sentiment but doing that in the presence of
your friend/her boyfriend seems out of place, even if it happened in
the era of free love.

Telling a woman she's beautiful is one of the best pickup lines there
are!!! It's also a good way to soften the wife.

--------------------------------------------------------

I don't know your age, but I know that 42 years ago it wasn't a "pickup"
line.
It was considered a compliment and it was sincere.

Yeah, maybe I have stopped my social evolution ..... thankfully.
Tip-Toeing through the tulips isn't exactly my style.

BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with.
Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall
to
convince me he's POTUS material anyway.

The guy is in love with the platitude. Bumper stickers, 999, whatever
it takes to motivate people is what Herman likes.

He's a simp. A darker, slightly more male Sarah Palin.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:32:06 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



"jps" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


62 doesn't make you old, unless your interaction with the world has
stopped evolving.

---------------------------------------------------

In many ways I think our society has become carried away with "political
correctness".
42 years ago I often told a young, very attractive woman how beautiful she
was.
She didn't sue me. She married me.

Eisboch

Was your wife someone else's girlfriend at the time, standing right
there?

I totally understand the sentiment but doing that in the presence of
your friend/her boyfriend seems out of place, even if it happened in
the era of free love.

Telling a woman she's beautiful is one of the best pickup lines there
are!!! It's also a good way to soften the wife.

My sister was out on a blind date when she met her future husband. He
walked right up to her and got her number, while the blind date was in
the bathroom, 27 years later and 3 sons, and they are still married.

You can't let political correctness get in the way of what you want.