Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
 

POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of
sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s
received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement —
significantly more than the two or three months’ salary Cain initially
recalled the woman obtained.

The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain
has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior.

Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the
communications department.

The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was
far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the
late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period.

It was also more than the payout a second association employee received
after complaining about Cain’s behavior. According to The New York
Times, the second woman received $35,000 — a year’s pay.

Cain’s changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their
amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that
there is more than one settlement.

On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, “If the restaurant [association]
did a settlement, I was unaware of it.”

Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to
plead ignorance: “As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of
settlement. I hope it wasn’t for much, because I didn’t do anything. But
the fact of the matter is, I’m not aware of a settlement that came out
of that accusation.”

Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that
there was a settlement.

“It might have been two months [salary]. I don’t remember the exact
number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, ‘The good news is,
we didn’t pay all of this money that was being demanded,” the former
association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the woman’s charges
were “baseless.”

At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: “Maybe three
months’ salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it.”

But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the
terms of the payout could have been larger.

On CNN’s Headline News, he said: “The one I remember and am aware of and
was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three
to six months’ severance pay, something of that nature.”

Read mo
http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x

Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
 

Maybe 0bama should have sexual harassment charges for screwing American
Liberty with debt-tax slavery?

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
 

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:17:59 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of
sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s
received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement —
significantly more than the two or three months’ salary Cain initially
recalled the woman obtained.

The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain
has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior.

Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the
communications department.

The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was
far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the
late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period.

It was also more than the payout a second association employee received
after complaining about Cain’s behavior. According to The New York
Times, the second woman received $35,000 — a year’s pay.

Cain’s changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their
amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that
there is more than one settlement.

On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, “If the restaurant [association]
did a settlement, I was unaware of it.”

Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to
plead ignorance: “As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of
settlement. I hope it wasn’t for much, because I didn’t do anything. But
the fact of the matter is, I’m not aware of a settlement that came out
of that accusation.”

Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that
there was a settlement.

“It might have been two months [salary]. I don’t remember the exact
number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, ‘The good news is,
we didn’t pay all of this money that was being demanded,” the former
association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the woman’s charges
were “baseless.”

At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: “Maybe three
months’ salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it.”

But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the
terms of the payout could have been larger.

On CNN’s Headline News, he said: “The one I remember and am aware of and
was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three
to six months’ severance pay, something of that nature.”

Read mo
http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x

By this weekend, he'll admit that he tried to get her to kiss it and
that she had a fine ass.

Mrs. Cain was going to make an appearance on Fox News today but
suddently backed out.

Looks like she's not going to play the stooge for Mr. Cain's Clarence
Thomas moments.

Although he did go and meet with Ginny Thomas, Clarence's wife, to
confide all. What a threesome. Two self-loathing black men and Ginny
Thomas, Teaparty operative.

One of the sites I like to visit has a vibrant comments section on
news pieces. One poster asked what chances were that Herman and Ginny
"got it on." Another answer that his balls were slappin' her chin
before the motel room door closed.

She's quite a woman, I can understand if Herman was attracted to her.

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/tag/ginni-thomas/

Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
 

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:19:41 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:17:59 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of
sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s
received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement —
significantly more than the two or three months’ salary Cain initially
recalled the woman obtained.

Maybe the restaurant just bet $80k that a black man could not get a
fair trial in Georgia when there were two white female claimants. ;-)

Maybe he did what they accused him of doing. Sounds like it was par
for Herman's course.

Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
 

On Nov 3, 2:17*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of
sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s
received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement —
significantly more than the two or three months’ salary Cain initially
recalled the woman obtained.

The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain
has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior.

Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the
communications department.

The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was
far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the
late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period.

It was also more than the payout a second association employee received
after complaining about Cain’s behavior. According to The New York
Times, the second woman received $35,000 — a year’s pay.

Cain’s changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their
amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that
there is more than one settlement.

On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, “If the restaurant [association]
did a settlement, I was unaware of it.”

Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to
plead ignorance: “As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of
settlement. I hope it wasn’t for much, because I didn’t do anything. But
the fact of the matter is, I’m not aware of a settlement that came out
of that accusation.”

Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that
there was a settlement.

“It might have been two months [salary]. I don’t remember the exact
number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, ‘The good news is,
we didn’t pay all of this money that was being demanded,” the former
association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the woman’s charges
were “baseless.”

At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: “Maybe three
months’ salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it..”

But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the
terms of the payout could have been larger.

On CNN’s Headline News, he said: “The one I remember and am aware of and
was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three
to six months’ severance pay, something of that nature.”

Read mohttp://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SlM_story.html

Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
 

On 11/4/11 7:52 AM, Tim wrote:
On Nov 3, 2:17 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of
sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s
received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement —
significantly more than the two or three months’ salary Cain initially
recalled the woman obtained.

The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain
has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior.

Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the
communications department.

The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was
far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the
late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period.

It was also more than the payout a second association employee received
after complaining about Cain’s behavior. According to The New York
Times, the second woman received $35,000 — a year’s pay.

Cain’s changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their
amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that
there is more than one settlement.

On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, “If the restaurant [association]
did a settlement, I was unaware of it.”

Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to
plead ignorance: “As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of
settlement. I hope it wasn’t for much, because I didn’t do anything. But
the fact of the matter is, I’m not aware of a settlement that came out
of that accusation.”

Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that
there was a settlement.

“It might have been two months [salary]. I don’t remember the exact
number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, ‘The good news is,
we didn’t pay all of this money that was being demanded,” the former
association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the woman’s charges
were “baseless.”

At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: “Maybe three
months’ salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it.”

But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the
terms of the payout could have been larger.

On CNN’s Headline News, he said: “The one I remember and am aware of and
was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three
to six months’ severance pay, something of that nature.”

Read mohttp://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SlM_story.html


Well, of course. True conservatives hate women and Cain has put those
pesky women in their place. Just ask Ann Limbaugh.

Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
 

On 11/3/2011 10:56 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:17:59 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of
sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s
received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement —
significantly more than the two or three months’ salary Cain initially
recalled the woman obtained.

The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain
has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior.

Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the
communications department.

The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was
far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the
late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period.

It was also more than the payout a second association employee received
after complaining about Cain’s behavior. According to The New York
Times, the second woman received $35,000 — a year’s pay.

Cain’s changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their
amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that
there is more than one settlement.

On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, “If the restaurant [association]
did a settlement, I was unaware of it.”

Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to
plead ignorance: “As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of
settlement. I hope it wasn’t for much, because I didn’t do anything. But
the fact of the matter is, I’m not aware of a settlement that came out
of that accusation.”

Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that
there was a settlement.

“It might have been two months [salary]. I don’t remember the exact
number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, ‘The good news is,
we didn’t pay all of this money that was being demanded,” the former
association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the woman’s charges
were “baseless.”

At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: “Maybe three
months’ salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it.”

But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the
terms of the payout could have been larger.

On CNN’s Headline News, he said: “The one I remember and am aware of and
was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three
to six months’ severance pay, something of that nature.”

Read mo
http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x

By this weekend, he'll admit that he tried to get her to kiss it and
that she had a fine ass.

Mrs. Cain was going to make an appearance on Fox News today but
suddently backed out.

Looks like she's not going to play the stooge for Mr. Cain's Clarence
Thomas moments.

Although he did go and meet with Ginny Thomas, Clarence's wife, to
confide all. What a threesome. Two self-loathing black men and Ginny
Thomas, Teaparty operative.

One of the sites I like to visit has a vibrant comments section on
news pieces. One poster asked what chances were that Herman and Ginny
"got it on." Another answer that his balls were slappin' her chin
before the motel room door closed.

She's quite a woman, I can understand if Herman was attracted to her.

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/tag/ginni-thomas/

The two of you should be ashamed of yourselves. I knew if we waited long
enough, the sun would shine on your racism
--
Jack Schidt

Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
 

On 11/4/2011 7:58 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/4/11 7:52 AM, Tim wrote:
On Nov 3, 2:17 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of
sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s
received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement —
significantly more than the two or three months’ salary Cain initially
recalled the woman obtained.

The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain
has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior.

Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the
communications department.

The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was
far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the
late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period.

It was also more than the payout a second association employee received
after complaining about Cain’s behavior. According to The New York
Times, the second woman received $35,000 — a year’s pay.

Cain’s changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their
amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that
there is more than one settlement.

On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, “If the restaurant [association]
did a settlement, I was unaware of it.”

Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to
plead ignorance: “As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of
settlement. I hope it wasn’t for much, because I didn’t do anything. But
the fact of the matter is, I’m not aware of a settlement that came out
of that accusation.”

Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that
there was a settlement.

“It might have been two months [salary]. I don’t remember the exact
number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, ‘The good news is,
we didn’t pay all of this money that was being demanded,” the former
association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the woman’s charges
were “baseless.”

At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: “Maybe three
months’ salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall
it.”

But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the
terms of the payout could have been larger.

On CNN’s Headline News, he said: “The one I remember and am aware of and
was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three
to six months’ severance pay, something of that nature.”

Read
mohttp://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SlM_story.html



Well, of course. True conservatives hate women and Cain has put those
pesky women in their place. Just ask Ann Limbaugh.

True conservatives wonder why die hard democrats think it's OK for
Monika to play the skin flute on ol' ankle pants while they dig their
teeth, like rabid dogs, into the unproven allegations that Herman Cain
said some things "that made them uncomfortable" to two black women.

--
Jack Schidt

Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
 

On 11/4/11 9:00 AM, Jack wrote:
the unproven allegations that Herman Cain
said some things "that made them uncomfortable" to two black women.


1. I guess I haven't been following the trail of Cain's missteps closely
enough, because I wasn't aware two of the women allegedly involved were
"black woman."

2. if they were "black women," does that make it okay to conservatives?
Would conservatives object if the two women were "white" women?

Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
 

On 11/4/2011 10:27 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/4/11 9:00 AM, Jack wrote:
the unproven allegations that Herman Cain
said some things "that made them uncomfortable" to two black women.


1. I guess I haven't been following the trail of Cain's missteps closely
enough, because I wasn't aware two of the women allegedly involved were
"black woman."

2. if they were "black women," does that make it okay to conservatives?
Would conservatives object if the two women were "white" women?

Picked right up on that didn't you. Always looking for that thin thread
to strangle the non democrat with. Good doggie Woof! Woof!

--
1-20-13 The end of an error