|
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of
sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement significantly more than the two or three months salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cains behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 a years pay. Cains changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it. Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasnt for much, because I didnt do anything. But the fact of the matter is, Im not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation. Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. It might have been two months [salary]. I dont remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, The good news is, we didnt pay all of this money that was being demanded, the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the womans charges were baseless. At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: Maybe three months salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it. But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNNs Headline News, he said: The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months severance pay, something of that nature. Read mo http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
Maybe 0bama should have sexual harassment charges for screwing American Liberty with debt-tax slavery? -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:17:59 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement significantly more than the two or three months salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cains behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 a years pay. Cains changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it. Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasnt for much, because I didnt do anything. But the fact of the matter is, Im not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation. Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. It might have been two months [salary]. I dont remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, The good news is, we didnt pay all of this money that was being demanded, the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the womans charges were baseless. At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: Maybe three months salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it. But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNNs Headline News, he said: The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months severance pay, something of that nature. Read mo http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x By this weekend, he'll admit that he tried to get her to kiss it and that she had a fine ass. Mrs. Cain was going to make an appearance on Fox News today but suddently backed out. Looks like she's not going to play the stooge for Mr. Cain's Clarence Thomas moments. Although he did go and meet with Ginny Thomas, Clarence's wife, to confide all. What a threesome. Two self-loathing black men and Ginny Thomas, Teaparty operative. One of the sites I like to visit has a vibrant comments section on news pieces. One poster asked what chances were that Herman and Ginny "got it on." Another answer that his balls were slappin' her chin before the motel room door closed. She's quite a woman, I can understand if Herman was attracted to her. http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/tag/ginni-thomas/ |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
|
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Nov 3, 2:17*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote: POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement significantly more than the two or three months salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cains behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 a years pay. Cains changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it. Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasnt for much, because I didnt do anything. But the fact of the matter is, Im not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation. Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. It might have been two months [salary]. I dont remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, The good news is, we didnt pay all of this money that was being demanded, the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the womans charges were baseless. At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: Maybe three months salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it.. But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNNs Headline News, he said: The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months severance pay, something of that nature. Read mohttp://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SlM_story.html |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/4/11 7:52 AM, Tim wrote:
On Nov 3, 2:17 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement significantly more than the two or three months salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cains behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 a years pay. Cains changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it. Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasnt for much, because I didnt do anything. But the fact of the matter is, Im not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation. Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. It might have been two months [salary]. I dont remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, The good news is, we didnt pay all of this money that was being demanded, the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the womans charges were baseless. At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: Maybe three months salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it. But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNNs Headline News, he said: The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months severance pay, something of that nature. Read mohttp://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SlM_story.html Well, of course. True conservatives hate women and Cain has put those pesky women in their place. Just ask Ann Limbaugh. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/3/2011 10:56 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:17:59 -0400, X ` Man wrote: POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement significantly more than the two or three months salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cains behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 a years pay. Cains changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it. Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasnt for much, because I didnt do anything. But the fact of the matter is, Im not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation. Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. It might have been two months [salary]. I dont remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, The good news is, we didnt pay all of this money that was being demanded, the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the womans charges were baseless. At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: Maybe three months salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it. But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNNs Headline News, he said: The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months severance pay, something of that nature. Read mo http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x By this weekend, he'll admit that he tried to get her to kiss it and that she had a fine ass. Mrs. Cain was going to make an appearance on Fox News today but suddently backed out. Looks like she's not going to play the stooge for Mr. Cain's Clarence Thomas moments. Although he did go and meet with Ginny Thomas, Clarence's wife, to confide all. What a threesome. Two self-loathing black men and Ginny Thomas, Teaparty operative. One of the sites I like to visit has a vibrant comments section on news pieces. One poster asked what chances were that Herman and Ginny "got it on." Another answer that his balls were slappin' her chin before the motel room door closed. She's quite a woman, I can understand if Herman was attracted to her. http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/tag/ginni-thomas/ The two of you should be ashamed of yourselves. I knew if we waited long enough, the sun would shine on your racism -- Jack Schidt |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/4/2011 7:58 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/4/11 7:52 AM, Tim wrote: On Nov 3, 2:17 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement significantly more than the two or three months salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cains behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 a years pay. Cains changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it. Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasnt for much, because I didnt do anything. But the fact of the matter is, Im not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation. Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. It might have been two months [salary]. I dont remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, The good news is, we didnt pay all of this money that was being demanded, the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the womans charges were baseless. At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: Maybe three months salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it. But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNNs Headline News, he said: The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months severance pay, something of that nature. Read mohttp://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SlM_story.html Well, of course. True conservatives hate women and Cain has put those pesky women in their place. Just ask Ann Limbaugh. True conservatives wonder why die hard democrats think it's OK for Monika to play the skin flute on ol' ankle pants while they dig their teeth, like rabid dogs, into the unproven allegations that Herman Cain said some things "that made them uncomfortable" to two black women. -- Jack Schidt |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/4/11 9:00 AM, Jack wrote:
the unproven allegations that Herman Cain said some things "that made them uncomfortable" to two black women. 1. I guess I haven't been following the trail of Cain's missteps closely enough, because I wasn't aware two of the women allegedly involved were "black woman." 2. if they were "black women," does that make it okay to conservatives? Would conservatives object if the two women were "white" women? |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/4/2011 10:27 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/4/11 9:00 AM, Jack wrote: the unproven allegations that Herman Cain said some things "that made them uncomfortable" to two black women. 1. I guess I haven't been following the trail of Cain's missteps closely enough, because I wasn't aware two of the women allegedly involved were "black woman." 2. if they were "black women," does that make it okay to conservatives? Would conservatives object if the two women were "white" women? Picked right up on that didn't you. Always looking for that thin thread to strangle the non democrat with. Good doggie Woof! Woof! -- 1-20-13 The end of an error |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 04/11/2011 5:52 AM, Tim wrote:
On Nov 3, 2:17 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement significantly more than the two or three months salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cains behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 a years pay. Cains changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it. Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasnt for much, because I didnt do anything. But the fact of the matter is, Im not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation. Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. It might have been two months [salary]. I dont remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, The good news is, we didnt pay all of this money that was being demanded, the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the womans charges were baseless. At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: Maybe three months salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it. But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNNs Headline News, he said: The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months severance pay, something of that nature. Read mohttp://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SlM_story.html Yep, the old boys club smear and fear failed. -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 08:46:32 -0400, Jack "You know
wrote: On 11/3/2011 10:56 PM, jps wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:17:59 -0400, X ` Man wrote: POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement significantly more than the two or three months salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cains behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 a years pay. Cains changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it. Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasnt for much, because I didnt do anything. But the fact of the matter is, Im not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation. Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. It might have been two months [salary]. I dont remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, The good news is, we didnt pay all of this money that was being demanded, the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the womans charges were baseless. At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: Maybe three months salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it. But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNNs Headline News, he said: The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months severance pay, something of that nature. Read mo http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x By this weekend, he'll admit that he tried to get her to kiss it and that she had a fine ass. Mrs. Cain was going to make an appearance on Fox News today but suddently backed out. Looks like she's not going to play the stooge for Mr. Cain's Clarence Thomas moments. Although he did go and meet with Ginny Thomas, Clarence's wife, to confide all. What a threesome. Two self-loathing black men and Ginny Thomas, Teaparty operative. One of the sites I like to visit has a vibrant comments section on news pieces. One poster asked what chances were that Herman and Ginny "got it on." Another answer that his balls were slappin' her chin before the motel room door closed. She's quite a woman, I can understand if Herman was attracted to her. http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/tag/ginni-thomas/ The two of you should be ashamed of yourselves. I knew if we waited long enough, the sun would shine on your racism For calling out two black me who are so ashamed of themselves that they turn their backs on their own people? Ever heard of self-hating Jews? Think it's racist to call them out? You play the Rush Limpballs racists card, which is a joker. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:00:59 -0400, Jack "You know
wrote: On 11/4/2011 7:58 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/4/11 7:52 AM, Tim wrote: On Nov 3, 2:17 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement significantly more than the two or three months salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cains behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 a years pay. Cains changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it. Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasnt for much, because I didnt do anything. But the fact of the matter is, Im not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation. Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. It might have been two months [salary]. I dont remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, The good news is, we didnt pay all of this money that was being demanded, the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the womans charges were baseless. At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: Maybe three months salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it. But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNNs Headline News, he said: The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months severance pay, something of that nature. Read mohttp://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SlM_story.html Well, of course. True conservatives hate women and Cain has put those pesky women in their place. Just ask Ann Limbaugh. True conservatives wonder why die hard democrats think it's OK for Monika to play the skin flute on ol' ankle pants while they dig their teeth, like rabid dogs, into the unproven allegations that Herman Cain said some things "that made them uncomfortable" to two black women. Because she was smitten and offered. Cain was looking to take. You probably can't detect a difference in those circumstances. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 04/11/2011 5:58 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/4/11 7:52 AM, Tim wrote: On Nov 3, 2:17 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement significantly more than the two or three months salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cains behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 a years pay. Cains changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it. Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasnt for much, because I didnt do anything. But the fact of the matter is, Im not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation. Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. It might have been two months [salary]. I dont remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, The good news is, we didnt pay all of this money that was being demanded, the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the womans charges were baseless. At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: Maybe three months salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it. But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNNs Headline News, he said: The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months severance pay, something of that nature. Read mohttp://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SlM_story.html Well, of course. True conservatives hate women and Cain has put those pesky women in their place. Just ask Ann Limbaugh. Funny, I love conservative women.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQLXWI229jQ Just don't let Joy Behar out without makeup...she is scary and no costume required for Halloween. -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
"jps" wrote in message ... Because she was smitten and offered. Cain was looking to take. You probably can't detect a difference in those circumstances. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you are suggesting that 52 year old married POTUS accepting a blow job in the Oval Office from a young, 22 year old infatuated intern is "ok" but poor Herman (who apparently didn't even get to first) is morally reprehensible? I am 62. Today a young musician who I've known for a while (he's in his late 20's maybe early 30's) came into the shop and introduced me to his girlfriend. She is drop dead gorgeous with a terrific personality. I was about to offer a sincere compliment but stopped .... realizing the world we live in now and just stuck my hand out and said, "Glad to meetcha". I liked it back when you could extend a polite and sincere compliment a good looking woman without having to worry about being sued. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 04/11/2011 6:08 PM, Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... Because she was smitten and offered. Cain was looking to take. You probably can't detect a difference in those circumstances. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you are suggesting that 52 year old married POTUS accepting a blow job in the Oval Office from a young, 22 year old infatuated intern is "ok" but poor Herman (who apparently didn't even get to first) is morally reprehensible? I am 62. Today a young musician who I've known for a while (he's in his late 20's maybe early 30's) came into the shop and introduced me to his girlfriend. She is drop dead gorgeous with a terrific personality. I was about to offer a sincere compliment but stopped .... realizing the world we live in now and just stuck my hand out and said, "Glad to meetcha". I liked it back when you could extend a polite and sincere compliment a good looking woman without having to worry about being sued. I remember in the early 90's the management leaned on people who did nothing, and had us males so scared we wouldn't even say hi to the women for fear of some BS accusation. I even remembering quipping about all men being persecuted for the few idiots. Just bull**** liberalism gone mad. And with settlements so low I am sure they were nuisance claims, cheaper to settle than to fight. But I am sure intimidation occurs, but that means in some way the instigator (could be a woman) has to apply some threat, promise for compliance or otherwise unwillingness. But fleabaggers don't have the rationality to differentiate. -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... Because she was smitten and offered. Cain was looking to take. You probably can't detect a difference in those circumstances. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you are suggesting that 52 year old married POTUS accepting a blow job in the Oval Office from a young, 22 year old infatuated intern is "ok" but poor Herman (who apparently didn't even get to first) is morally reprehensible? I am 62. Today a young musician who I've known for a while (he's in his late 20's maybe early 30's) came into the shop and introduced me to his girlfriend. She is drop dead gorgeous with a terrific personality. I was about to offer a sincere compliment but stopped .... realizing the world we live in now and just stuck my hand out and said, "Glad to meetcha". I liked it back when you could extend a polite and sincere compliment a good looking woman without having to worry about being sued. You can. Catch them in the act of smoking, then walk up and say, "You ladies are far too pretty to be smoking. Keep it up and you'll look like me!" Always gets a smile. Though they usually keep on smoking. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/5/2011 7:27 AM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Because she was smitten and offered. Cain was looking to take. You probably can't detect a difference in those circumstances. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you are suggesting that 52 year old married POTUS accepting a blow job in the Oval Office from a young, 22 year old infatuated intern is "ok" but poor Herman (who apparently didn't even get to first) is morally reprehensible? I am 62. Today a young musician who I've known for a while (he's in his late 20's maybe early 30's) came into the shop and introduced me to his girlfriend. She is drop dead gorgeous with a terrific personality. I was about to offer a sincere compliment but stopped .... realizing the world we live in now and just stuck my hand out and said, "Glad to meetcha". I liked it back when you could extend a polite and sincere compliment a good looking woman without having to worry about being sued. You can. Catch them in the act of smoking, then walk up and say, "You ladies are far too pretty to be smoking. Keep it up and you'll look like me!" Always gets a smile. Though they usually keep on smoking. I'm far too handsome to be able to use that line. -- 1-20-13 The end of an error |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Nov 5, 9:34*am, Drifter wrote:
On 11/5/2011 7:27 AM, John H wrote: On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, *wrote: "jps" *wrote in messagenews:sv58b7ptm25sbfqds1njucg3514pultrbf@4ax .com... Because she was smitten and offered. *Cain was looking to take. You probably can't detect a difference in those circumstances. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you are suggesting that 52 year old married POTUS accepting a blow job in the Oval Office from a young, 22 year old infatuated intern is "ok" *but poor Herman (who apparently didn't even get to first) *is morally reprehensible? I am 62. *Today a young musician who I've known for a while (he's in his late 20's maybe early 30's) came into the shop and introduced me to his girlfriend. * She is drop dead gorgeous with a terrific personality. I was about to offer a sincere compliment *but stopped .... realizing the world we live in now and just stuck my hand out and said, "Glad to meetcha". I liked it back when you could extend a polite and sincere compliment a good looking woman without having to worry about being sued. You can. Catch them in the act of smoking, then walk up and say, "You ladies are far too pretty to be smoking. Keep it up and you'll look like me!" Always gets a smile. Though they usually keep on smoking. I'm far too handsome to be able to use that line. -- 1-20-13 The end of an error- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Is that what they tell you in those underground bath houses? |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... Because she was smitten and offered. Cain was looking to take. You probably can't detect a difference in those circumstances. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you are suggesting that 52 year old married POTUS accepting a blow job in the Oval Office from a young, 22 year old infatuated intern is "ok" but poor Herman (who apparently didn't even get to first) is morally reprehensible? I am 62. Today a young musician who I've known for a while (he's in his late 20's maybe early 30's) came into the shop and introduced me to his girlfriend. She is drop dead gorgeous with a terrific personality. I was about to offer a sincere compliment but stopped .... realizing the world we live in now and just stuck my hand out and said, "Glad to meetcha". I liked it back when you could extend a polite and sincere compliment a good looking woman without having to worry about being sued. Wow, talk about putting words in somebody's mouth! Clinton was way out of line, screwed himself, the party and the country while giving Henry Hyde (adulterer) and Newt Gingrich (adulterer) a reason to go after him. But Clinton was pursued by Lewinsky. Are you saying that those women who sued for harassment were pursuing Cain? From what I can tell, he was making leud suggestions to married women who worked for him and weren't giving him any green lights. And you think that's the same as an intern swooning over you? Richard, why would you make a comment on someone's looks? If she was butt ugly, would you have wanted to say something? 62 doesn't make you old, unless your interaction with the world has stopped evolving. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
"jps" wrote in message ...
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:00:59 -0400, Jack "You know wrote: On 11/4/2011 7:58 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/4/11 7:52 AM, Tim wrote: On Nov 3, 2:17 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: POLITICO has learned that one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s received a payout of about $45,000 as part of her settlement — significantly more than the two or three months’ salary Cain initially recalled the woman obtained. The woman who received the approximately $45,000 is the staffer who Cain has acknowledged formally lodged a complaint about his behavior. Cain described her in a Fox News interview as a writer in the communications department. The compensation the woman received as part of her departure package was far more than that what a midlevel trade association employee in the late 1990s would have made over a two-to-three month period. It was also more than the payout a second association employee received after complaining about Cain’s behavior. According to The New York Times, the second woman received $35,000 — a year’s pay. Cain’s changing stories about whether settlements existed, and their amounts, have muddled his explanations. He has not acknowledged that there is more than one settlement. On Monday morning, Cain told Fox News, “If the restaurant [association] did a settlement, I was unaware of it.” Speaking midday Monday at The National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: “As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasn’t for much, because I didn’t do anything. But the fact of the matter is, I’m not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation.” Then, in a Fox interview taped Monday afternoon, Cain conceded that there was a settlement. “It might have been two months [salary]. I don’t remember the exact number, but I do remember my general counsel saying, ‘The good news is, we didn’t pay all of this money that was being demanded,” the former association CEO told Greta Van Susteren, claiming the woman’s charges were “baseless.” At another point in the interview, Cain said of the payout: “Maybe three months’ salary or something like that, just vaguely trying to recall it.” But on Tuesday morning, he shifted his answer again, suggesting that the terms of the payout could have been larger. On CNN’s Headline News, he said: “The one I remember and am aware of and was a financial settlement and it was somewhere in the vicinity of three to six months’ severance pay, something of that nature.” Read mohttp://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz1cfh9K19x http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SlM_story.html Well, of course. True conservatives hate women and Cain has put those pesky women in their place. Just ask Ann Limbaugh. True conservatives wonder why die hard democrats think it's OK for Monika to play the skin flute on ol' ankle pants while they dig their teeth, like rabid dogs, into the unproven allegations that Herman Cain said some things "that made them uncomfortable" to two black women. Because she was smitten and offered. Cain was looking to take. You probably can't detect a difference in those circumstances. --------------------------------------------------------- Monica came up in the Paula Jones lawsuit, and Ms. Jones was not a willing participant. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
"Eisboch" wrote in message
... "jps" wrote in message ... Because she was smitten and offered. Cain was looking to take. You probably can't detect a difference in those circumstances. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you are suggesting that 52 year old married POTUS accepting a blow job in the Oval Office from a young, 22 year old infatuated intern is "ok" but poor Herman (who apparently didn't even get to first) is morally reprehensible? I am 62. Today a young musician who I've known for a while (he's in his late 20's maybe early 30's) came into the shop and introduced me to his girlfriend. She is drop dead gorgeous with a terrific personality. I was about to offer a sincere compliment but stopped .... realizing the world we live in now and just stuck my hand out and said, "Glad to meetcha". I liked it back when you could extend a polite and sincere compliment a good looking woman without having to worry about being sued. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Place I worked had a female who claimed the chief scientist propositioned her. She was a smelly pig, and probably made her way through engineering school giving favors to Profs. As she sucked as an engineer. She had to apologize and agree to a settlement when she was proved wrong. The Chief scientist both had a great wife and a great dislike for the lady accusing him way before the accusation. Lots of get aheads were done via the SA charge. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
"jps" wrote in message ... On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: 62 doesn't make you old, unless your interaction with the world has stopped evolving. --------------------------------------------------- In many ways I think our society has become carried away with "political correctness". 42 years ago I often told a young, very attractive woman how beautiful she was. She didn't sue me. She married me. Eisboch |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:32:06 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: 62 doesn't make you old, unless your interaction with the world has stopped evolving. --------------------------------------------------- In many ways I think our society has become carried away with "political correctness". 42 years ago I often told a young, very attractive woman how beautiful she was. She didn't sue me. She married me. Eisboch Was your wife someone else's girlfriend at the time, standing right there? I totally understand the sentiment but doing that in the presence of your friend/her boyfriend seems out of place, even if it happened in the era of free love. Telling a woman she's beautiful is one of the best pickup lines there are!!! It's also a good way to soften the wife. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
"jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:32:06 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: 62 doesn't make you old, unless your interaction with the world has stopped evolving. --------------------------------------------------- In many ways I think our society has become carried away with "political correctness". 42 years ago I often told a young, very attractive woman how beautiful she was. She didn't sue me. She married me. Eisboch Was your wife someone else's girlfriend at the time, standing right there? I totally understand the sentiment but doing that in the presence of your friend/her boyfriend seems out of place, even if it happened in the era of free love. Telling a woman she's beautiful is one of the best pickup lines there are!!! It's also a good way to soften the wife. -------------------------------------------------------- I don't know your age, but I know that 42 years ago it wasn't a "pickup" line. It was considered a compliment and it was sincere. Yeah, maybe I have stopped my social evolution ..... thankfully. Tip-Toeing through the tulips isn't exactly my style. BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
|
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote:
.. BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
"X ` Man" wrote in message ... On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: .. BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. ----------------------------------------- Nope. I'll tell you ... Bill Clinton, ... now that he's not running for anything and is not necessarily obligated to align himself 100 percent with the Democratic party-line ... is making more sense to me than any of the current crop of candidates for office or incumbents (on either side) that are simply echoing party-line politics. Listening to him now on Morning Joe, he has put partisan politics aside and is melding the best ideas of both parties including some of his own. He is one of the few that has studied the past 30 years or so and understands the economic trends that have taken place as we moved to a global competitive economy. Clinton offers productive thoughts and ideas rather than pointing fingers and casting blame like the rest of the political banana heads seeking or holding political office. Eisboch |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:05:48 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:32:06 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: 62 doesn't make you old, unless your interaction with the world has stopped evolving. --------------------------------------------------- In many ways I think our society has become carried away with "political correctness". 42 years ago I often told a young, very attractive woman how beautiful she was. She didn't sue me. She married me. Eisboch Was your wife someone else's girlfriend at the time, standing right there? I totally understand the sentiment but doing that in the presence of your friend/her boyfriend seems out of place, even if it happened in the era of free love. Telling a woman she's beautiful is one of the best pickup lines there are!!! It's also a good way to soften the wife. -------------------------------------------------------- I don't know your age, but I know that 42 years ago it wasn't a "pickup" line. It was considered a compliment and it was sincere. Yeah, maybe I have stopped my social evolution ..... thankfully. Tip-Toeing through the tulips isn't exactly my style. BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. The guy is in love with the platitude. Bumper stickers, 999, whatever it takes to motivate people is what Herman likes. He's a simp. A darker, slightly more male Sarah Palin. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` Man
wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one liners from Harry, clever? LOL! |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/8/11 5:14 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one liners from Harry, clever? LOL! Bigotry? I voted for the black guy in the last presidential election. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:20:40 -0500, X ` Man
wrote: On 11/8/11 5:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one liners from Harry, clever? LOL! Bigotry? I voted for the black guy in the last presidential election. You voted for the black guy because you knew he was the better choice, regardless of color. Among candidates presently announced, he's still the better choice. If anyone with a brain and some integrity showed up on the Republican side, they wouldn't give 'em a second look, just like Huntsman. He's the only guy on their side with a good chance of beating Obama and they haven't a clue. The collective consciousness on the right hovers just about Snotty's intellectual elevation. They're not about to back someone who can win when they can rally around a platitude flinging pig like Cain. |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
X ` Man wrote:
On 11/8/11 5:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one liners from Harry, clever? LOL! Bigotry? I voted for the black guy in the last presidential election. There weren't any black candidates on that ballot. You voted for a guy who is 1/2 black, silly. -HB |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
On 11/8/2011 7:41 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
X ` Man wrote: On 11/8/11 5:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one liners from Harry, clever? LOL! Bigotry? I voted for the black guy in the last presidential election. There weren't any black candidates on that ballot. You voted for a guy who is 1/2 black, silly. -HB snerk racists always crack me up, next he will be telling us about all his black friends;) |
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
|
Conservative Cain Sludes Back into the Primordial Abyss
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com